|
Author
|
Topic: Lets try this again....What will it make? Posts your guesses *TUNED WITH VIDEOS*
|
warhorse58gt
¯
Member # 7702
|
posted
 
 
Not bad, not bad at all. ![[Whoo Whooooo!]](graemlins/woowoo.gif) What kind of port work did you get. I'd like to see more flow from the exhaust side. Maybe a bigger carb also.
--------------------
WOLFPACK RACING
With guns, we are 'citizens'. Without them, we are 'subjects'.
83gt 354ci sbf 9.40 @ 143
77 cobra 2 171ci 97hp of pure fury!
Posts: 4200 | From: 209 | Registered: Jun 2007
| :
|
|
Wildfire532FB
CAFords OG
Member # 1482
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by warhorse58gt:
Not bad, not bad at all. What kind of port work did you get. I'd like to see more flow from the exhaust side. Maybe a bigger carb also.
I just got the intake ported, they were kinda weird looking like edelbrock didn't finish the job. They cleaned the exhaust a bit.
Tuner said my carb was fine, but wasn't sure on my fuel pump. We did a pressure check of it on a run and it kept up fine.
Also since this is a different dyno than AED's i am kinda curious what my numbers would be on AED's dyno. Might take it there and do a quick run just to see what she puts down.
--------------------
./_ _ _ ___ __\
(]]]_ _ o _ _[[[)
|\_o_ __ __o_/|
|__|..........|__|
68 Fastback
84 CJ7
94 HMMWV
95 GT
03 F350
17 Fusion Hybrid
Posts: 17578 | From: 530 | Registered: Jun 2002
| :
|
|
Wildfire532FB
CAFords OG
Member # 1482
|
posted
http://youtu.be/c6ifl0-PiX4
--------------------
./_ _ _ ___ __\
(]]]_ _ o _ _[[[)
|\_o_ __ __o_/|
|__|..........|__|
68 Fastback
84 CJ7
94 HMMWV
95 GT
03 F350
17 Fusion Hybrid
Posts: 17578 | From: 530 | Registered: Jun 2002
| :
|
|
SIC9250
¯
Member # 8216
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Wildfire532FB:
quote:
Originally posted by warhorse58gt:
Not bad, not bad at all. What kind of port work did you get. I'd like to see more flow from the exhaust side. Maybe a bigger carb also.
I just got the intake ported, they were kinda weird looking like edelbrock didn't finish the job. They cleaned the exhaust a bit.
Tuner said my carb was fine, but wasn't sure on my fuel pump. We did a pressure check of it on a run and it kept up fine.
Also since this is a different dyno than AED's i am kinda curious what my numbers would be on AED's dyno. Might take it there and do a quick run just to see what she puts down.
You took it to motor machine that's why..Dons a great dude no doubt and knows his shit but his dyno reads low...seen it with multiple cars and he swears everyone else's is wrong lol,if I'm wrong ill stand corrected but by the look of the checkered floor you went to motor machine...
--------------------
Coyote_Mach1
Posts: 6959 | From: in the drivers seat. | Registered: Feb 2008
| :
|
|
SIC9250
¯
Member # 8216
|
posted
Please take her to AED as is untouched and see what she puts down..I've been wanting to do this comparison forever but with a car that makes over 500 rw and see the dyno differences...
--------------------
Coyote_Mach1
Posts: 6959 | From: in the drivers seat. | Registered: Feb 2008
| :
|
|
93PONY
Mr. Valve Events
Member # 60
|
posted
Don always talks shit about my Dyno. He's full of it.
My Dyno reads extremely comparable to a DynoJet. (Within 1/2% in most cases)
3 weeks ago I tuned a 2012 GT M6 with base Paxton kit on E85 and it put down 727SAE on my Dyno. Yesterday I finished up remote tuning a 2012 GT M6 with the same Paxton kit on the same pulley on E85 at GTR down south and it put down.....728SAE with the same timing and fuel curve.
A chassis Dyno is a tuning tool, nothing more. The only numbers that matter come on a time slip that's titled 'Sacramento Raceway'.
--------------------
www.advancedenginedevelopment.com
SCT dealer
Dynotuning
(916)715-7569
Posts: 4265 | From: Fair Oaks, CA | Registered: Nov 2000
| :
|
|
SIC9250
¯
Member # 8216
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 93PONY:
A chassis Dyno is a tuning tool, nothing more. The only numbers that matter come on a time slip that's titled 'Sacramento Raceway'.
This!
--------------------
Coyote_Mach1
Posts: 6959 | From: in the drivers seat. | Registered: Feb 2008
| :
|
|
Wildfire532FB
CAFords OG
Member # 1482
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by SIC9250:
quote:
Originally posted by Wildfire532FB:
quote:
Originally posted by warhorse58gt:
Not bad, not bad at all. What kind of port work did you get. I'd like to see more flow from the exhaust side. Maybe a bigger carb also.
I just got the intake ported, they were kinda weird looking like edelbrock didn't finish the job. They cleaned the exhaust a bit.
Tuner said my carb was fine, but wasn't sure on my fuel pump. We did a pressure check of it on a run and it kept up fine.
Also since this is a different dyno than AED's i am kinda curious what my numbers would be on AED's dyno. Might take it there and do a quick run just to see what she puts down.
You took it to motor machine that's why..Dons a great dude no doubt and knows his shit but his dyno reads low...seen it with multiple cars and he swears everyone else's is wrong lol,if I'm wrong ill stand corrected but by the look of the checkered floor you went to motor machine...
Yeah i went to Motor Machine, Don tuned it last time i wanted him to tune it again this time.
Its weird that different machines give different numbers, i thought it was easy to measure HP but i guess every company has different graphs.
--------------------
./_ _ _ ___ __\
(]]]_ _ o _ _[[[)
|\_o_ __ __o_/|
|__|..........|__|
68 Fastback
84 CJ7
94 HMMWV
95 GT
03 F350
17 Fusion Hybrid
Posts: 17578 | From: 530 | Registered: Jun 2002
| :
|
|
Wildfire532FB
CAFords OG
Member # 1482
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 93PONY:
Don always talks shit about my Dyno. He's full of it.
My Dyno reads extremely comparable to a DynoJet. (Within 1/2% in most cases)
3 weeks ago I tuned a 2012 GT M6 with base Paxton kit on E85 and it put down 727SAE on my Dyno. Yesterday I finished up remote tuning a 2012 GT M6 with the same Paxton kit on the same pulley on E85 at GTR down south and it put down.....728SAE with the same timing and fuel curve.
A chassis Dyno is a tuning tool, nothing more. The only numbers that matter come on a time slip that's titled 'Sacramento Raceway'.
He didn't talk shit about your dyno and i know about those numbers, dyno numbers are just bragging numbers.
I would like to make a run on your dyno though just to compare.
--------------------
./_ _ _ ___ __\
(]]]_ _ o _ _[[[)
|\_o_ __ __o_/|
|__|..........|__|
68 Fastback
84 CJ7
94 HMMWV
95 GT
03 F350
17 Fusion Hybrid
Posts: 17578 | From: 530 | Registered: Jun 2002
| :
|
|
turbo50
¯
Member # 6700
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Wildfire532FB:
quote:
Originally posted by 93PONY:
Don always talks shit about my Dyno. He's full of it.
My Dyno reads extremely comparable to a DynoJet. (Within 1/2% in most cases)
3 weeks ago I tuned a 2012 GT M6 with base Paxton kit on E85 and it put down 727SAE on my Dyno. Yesterday I finished up remote tuning a 2012 GT M6 with the same Paxton kit on the same pulley on E85 at GTR down south and it put down.....728SAE with the same timing and fuel curve.
A chassis Dyno is a tuning tool, nothing more. The only numbers that matter come on a time slip that's titled 'Sacramento Raceway'.
He didn't talk shit about your dyno and i know about those numbers, dyno numbers are just bragging numbers.
I would like to make a run on your dyno though just to compare.
I wouldnt bother long as your happy and I guarantee if you take it to the track it won't hook anyway
--------------------
.........when was the last time YOU built something with YOUR own hands?
I offer quality sidework at reasonable prices. PM ME
Posts: 7606 | From: Discovery Bay, California | Registered: Apr 2006
| :
|
|
CornOil_&_Boost
¯
Member # 5888
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Wildfire532FB:
quote:
Originally posted by 93PONY:
Don always talks shit about my Dyno. He's full of it.
My Dyno reads extremely comparable to a DynoJet. (Within 1/2% in most cases)
3 weeks ago I tuned a 2012 GT M6 with base Paxton kit on E85 and it put down 727SAE on my Dyno. Yesterday I finished up remote tuning a 2012 GT M6 with the same Paxton kit on the same pulley on E85 at GTR down south and it put down.....728SAE with the same timing and fuel curve.
A chassis Dyno is a tuning tool, nothing more. The only numbers that matter come on a time slip that's titled 'Sacramento Raceway'.
He didn't talk shit about your dyno and i know about those numbers, dyno numbers are just bragging numbers.
I would like to make a run on your dyno though just to compare.
yes, recently, Donnie has talked shit AED's dyno when he was dynoing Finn's car there....saying it read high blah blah blah...especially after my buddy put down over 1000RW on AED's dyno...
for comparison...had a friend dyno at AED and put down 687RW....about 2 months later, we went down South to a Dynojet and it put down 702RW on the same tune
and you're right though..dyno numbers are jsut bragging numbers..almost as bad as people who will take those dyno numbers and convert them Flywheel HP to brag...
[ 2013-09-11, 08:20 AM: Message edited by: CornOil_&_Boost ]
--------------------
https://www.facebook.com/pushrodpoweredmustangs
'95 Cobra - small engine / small turbo -
'02 Excursion 7.3 - tow vehicle
'14 - Chevy Volt - DD
Posts: 5097 | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
Greasy
¯
Member # 5258
|
posted
Great numbers! I'd be more than happy.
--------------------
'93 Cobra-Coyote Powered
'03 DSG Cobra
'13 Dodge Cummins
'14 Rubicon X
Posts: 3272 | From: North Dallas | Registered: Jan 2005
| :
|
|
CornOil_&_Boost
¯
Member # 5888
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Wildfire532FB:
Car made 548rwhp and 549rwtq. Max HP was at 5900rpms Max TQ was at 3200rpms and flatlined all the way to 6,000rpms. ![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
I'll post some videos in a few.
forgot to mention..great numbers BTW...6000RPM is screaming for that big block
--------------------
https://www.facebook.com/pushrodpoweredmustangs
'95 Cobra - small engine / small turbo -
'02 Excursion 7.3 - tow vehicle
'14 - Chevy Volt - DD
Posts: 5097 | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
Wildfire532FB
CAFords OG
Member # 1482
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by CornOil_&_Boost:
quote:
Originally posted by Wildfire532FB:
quote:
Originally posted by 93PONY:
Don always talks shit about my Dyno. He's full of it.
My Dyno reads extremely comparable to a DynoJet. (Within 1/2% in most cases)
3 weeks ago I tuned a 2012 GT M6 with base Paxton kit on E85 and it put down 727SAE on my Dyno. Yesterday I finished up remote tuning a 2012 GT M6 with the same Paxton kit on the same pulley on E85 at GTR down south and it put down.....728SAE with the same timing and fuel curve.
A chassis Dyno is a tuning tool, nothing more. The only numbers that matter come on a time slip that's titled 'Sacramento Raceway'.
He didn't talk shit about your dyno and i know about those numbers, dyno numbers are just bragging numbers.
I would like to make a run on your dyno though just to compare.
yes, recently, Donnie has talked shit AED's dyno when he was dynoing Finn's car there....saying it read high blah blah blah...especially after my buddy put down over 1000RW on AED's dyno...
for comparison...had a friend dyno at AED and put down 687RW....about 2 months later, we went down South to a Dynojet and it put down 702RW on the same tune
and you're right though..dyno numbers are jsut bragging numbers..almost as bad as people who will take those dyno numbers and convert them Flywheel HP to brag...
I meant he wasn't talking shit when I was there.
--------------------
./_ _ _ ___ __\
(]]]_ _ o _ _[[[)
|\_o_ __ __o_/|
|__|..........|__|
68 Fastback
84 CJ7
94 HMMWV
95 GT
03 F350
17 Fusion Hybrid
Posts: 17578 | From: 530 | Registered: Jun 2002
| :
|
|
CornOil_&_Boost
¯
Member # 5888
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Wildfire532FB:
quote:
Originally posted by CornOil_&_Boost:
quote:
Originally posted by Wildfire532FB:
quote:
Originally posted by 93PONY:
Don always talks shit about my Dyno. He's full of it.
My Dyno reads extremely comparable to a DynoJet. (Within 1/2% in most cases)
3 weeks ago I tuned a 2012 GT M6 with base Paxton kit on E85 and it put down 727SAE on my Dyno. Yesterday I finished up remote tuning a 2012 GT M6 with the same Paxton kit on the same pulley on E85 at GTR down south and it put down.....728SAE with the same timing and fuel curve.
A chassis Dyno is a tuning tool, nothing more. The only numbers that matter come on a time slip that's titled 'Sacramento Raceway'.
He didn't talk shit about your dyno and i know about those numbers, dyno numbers are just bragging numbers.
I would like to make a run on your dyno though just to compare.
yes, recently, Donnie has talked shit AED's dyno when he was dynoing Finn's car there....saying it read high blah blah blah...especially after my buddy put down over 1000RW on AED's dyno...
for comparison...had a friend dyno at AED and put down 687RW....about 2 months later, we went down South to a Dynojet and it put down 702RW on the same tune
and you're right though..dyno numbers are jsut bragging numbers..almost as bad as people who will take those dyno numbers and convert them Flywheel HP to brag...
I meant he wasn't talking shit when I was there.
main thing is..as long as you're happy...
your car is going to be a tire burning machine regardless..
and it put down 550RW through an unlocked auto...which is pretty damn awesome especially for a street car
--------------------
https://www.facebook.com/pushrodpoweredmustangs
'95 Cobra - small engine / small turbo -
'02 Excursion 7.3 - tow vehicle
'14 - Chevy Volt - DD
Posts: 5097 | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
iceman302
¯
Member # 7180
|
posted
I'm pretty sure he's still running a 5 speed Tremec box.
Nice numbers, Dana!
[ 2013-09-11, 11:32 AM: Message edited by: iceman302 ]
--------------------
'65 Mustang Fastback
Posts: 4171 | From: Rancho Murieta | Registered: Oct 2006
| :
|
|
MR. STALLION
Stallions President
Member # 374
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by CornOil_&_Boost:
quote:
Originally posted by Wildfire532FB:
quote:
Originally posted by 93PONY:
Don always talks shit about my Dyno. He's full of it.
My Dyno reads extremely comparable to a DynoJet. (Within 1/2% in most cases)
3 weeks ago I tuned a 2012 GT M6 with base Paxton kit on E85 and it put down 727SAE on my Dyno. Yesterday I finished up remote tuning a 2012 GT M6 with the same Paxton kit on the same pulley on E85 at GTR down south and it put down.....728SAE with the same timing and fuel curve.
A chassis Dyno is a tuning tool, nothing more. The only numbers that matter come on a time slip that's titled 'Sacramento Raceway'.
He didn't talk shit about your dyno and i know about those numbers, dyno numbers are just bragging numbers.
I would like to make a run on your dyno though just to compare.
yes, recently, Donnie has talked shit AED's dyno when he was dynoing Finn's car there....saying it read high blah blah blah...especially after my buddy put down over 1000RW on AED's dyno...
for comparison...had a friend dyno at AED and put down 687RW....about 2 months later, we went down South to a Dynojet and it put down 702RW on the same tune
and you're right though..dyno numbers are jsut bragging numbers..almost as bad as people who will take those dyno numbers and convert them Flywheel HP to brag...
This is very true.
We would get the same comment with our dyno.
Mustang guys said it read low, vette guys said it was high.....as they were comparing numbers to other cars with "similar" mods.
We here have done comparisons with cars that come thru here. And I personally have had cars come here from other shops....with dyno sheets....and i've strapped them down and run them with the no changes.....and have seen as much as a 50rwhp difference.
As long and the car runs great, makes good power, and timeslips get lower....dyno numnbers are just ego convos.
--------------------
Jason McCallum
89LX: Built, Stroked, & Blown
Posts: 1799 | From: SJ/Campbell, CA USA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
MauriSSio
¯
Member # 9943
|
posted
548rwhp is still good even through a manual. i bet you'd see some power gains by going with a 1050 dominator or an 1150. what was the final a/f ratio?
Posts: 503 | Registered: Apr 2010
| :
|
|
turbo50
¯
Member # 6700
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by MauriSSio:
548rwhp is still good even through a manual. i bet you'd see some power gains by going with a 1050 dominator or an 1150. what was the final a/f ratio?
This and add some fuel pump.
Besides a/f ratio what was the vacuum reading if any at wot and peak torque or hp, I bet there was a tiny bit of vacuum.....
--------------------
.........when was the last time YOU built something with YOUR own hands?
I offer quality sidework at reasonable prices. PM ME
Posts: 7606 | From: Discovery Bay, California | Registered: Apr 2006
| :
|
|
Wildfire532FB
CAFords OG
Member # 1482
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by turbo50:
quote:
Originally posted by MauriSSio:
548rwhp is still good even through a manual. i bet you'd see some power gains by going with a 1050 dominator or an 1150. what was the final a/f ratio?
This and add some fuel pump.
Besides a/f ratio what was the vacuum reading if any at wot and peak torque or hp, I bet there was a tiny bit of vacuum.....
i didn't get to see the vac.
12.8 A/F
--------------------
./_ _ _ ___ __\
(]]]_ _ o _ _[[[)
|\_o_ __ __o_/|
|__|..........|__|
68 Fastback
84 CJ7
94 HMMWV
95 GT
03 F350
17 Fusion Hybrid
Posts: 17578 | From: 530 | Registered: Jun 2002
| :
|
|
phil a
¯
Member # 6951
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by turbo50:
quote:
Originally posted by MauriSSio:
548rwhp is still good even through a manual. i bet you'd see some power gains by going with a 1050 dominator or an 1150. what was the final a/f ratio?
This and add some fuel pump.
Besides a/f ratio what was the vacuum reading if any at wot and peak torque or hp, I bet there was a tiny bit of vacuum.....
Hey Dan
Do you ask about vacuum at WOT because that'd mean that the engine is trying to pull more air through the ports or carb than they'll allow? And if so, this'd indicate that there's power being left on the table due to this/these restrictions?
In my limited understanding of dynos, is it accurate to say that, regardless of what it makes on this dyno vs that dyno, as long as the tune is optimized, it'll run the same numbers at the track? And thus the only difference is the amount of 'resistance' on a certain dyno affecting the hp/tq numbers?
Thanks
Phil
Posts: 1261 | From: toledo oh | Registered: Jul 2006
| :
|
|
phil a
¯
Member # 6951
|
posted
Oh, and nice numbers Dana
Out of curiosity, what does your car weigh? Any plans to take it to Sac Raceway when the weather cools off a bit? I'm outta state at the moment - what's the temps been lately? Still hot?
Phil
Posts: 1261 | From: toledo oh | Registered: Jul 2006
| :
|
|
John91coupe
CAFords OG
Member # 18
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by phil a:
Oh, and nice numbers Dana
Out of curiosity, what does your car weigh? Any plans to take it to Sac Raceway when the weather cools off a bit? I'm outta state at the moment - what's the temps been lately? Still hot?
Phil
Still hot. Waiting for it to cool down myself.
--------------------
D-2R ProCharged R302 331
1.410 60 ft.
5.784 @ 122.92 1/8
8.953 @ 155.08
MM&FF Feature June 2003
Posts: 1361 | From: Grass Valley, CA | Registered: Sep 2000
| :
|
|
Wildfire532FB
CAFords OG
Member # 1482
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by John91coupe:
quote:
Originally posted by phil a:
Oh, and nice numbers Dana
Out of curiosity, what does your car weigh? Any plans to take it to Sac Raceway when the weather cools off a bit? I'm outta state at the moment - what's the temps been lately? Still hot?
Phil
Still hot. Waiting for it to cool down myself.
Yeah I am planning on running it at the track again this fall.
--------------------
./_ _ _ ___ __\
(]]]_ _ o _ _[[[)
|\_o_ __ __o_/|
|__|..........|__|
68 Fastback
84 CJ7
94 HMMWV
95 GT
03 F350
17 Fusion Hybrid
Posts: 17578 | From: 530 | Registered: Jun 2002
| :
|
|
Wildfire532FB
CAFords OG
Member # 1482
|
posted
I should have set up the GoPro inside the car so I could look at all the gauges. Only gauges I really paid attention to was the oil pressure and fuel pressure.
--------------------
./_ _ _ ___ __\
(]]]_ _ o _ _[[[)
|\_o_ __ __o_/|
|__|..........|__|
68 Fastback
84 CJ7
94 HMMWV
95 GT
03 F350
17 Fusion Hybrid
Posts: 17578 | From: 530 | Registered: Jun 2002
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
