|
Author
|
Topic: Dynotuned the Fastback
|
Wildfire532FB
CAFords OG
Member # 1482
|
posted
 
 
Dynotuned the Fastback yesterday at AED. Pretty happy with the numbers.
514RWHP and 576ft/lbs which equals 617hp and 692tq at the crank on 91 octane
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1so_nbBIekU
[ August 19, 2010, 12:01 AM: Message edited by: WildFire532FB ]
--------------------
./_ _ _ ___ __\
(]]]_ _ o _ _[[[)
|\_o_ __ __o_/|
|__|..........|__|
68 Fastback
84 CJ7
94 HMMWV
95 GT
03 F350
17 Fusion Hybrid
Posts: 17578 | From: 530 | Registered: Jun 2002
| :
|
|
|
|
89bluenotch
¯
Member # 7454
|
posted
very nice
--------------------
-Gunnar
89 coupe
54 f100
R.I.P. SILVERLX
Posts: 1857 | From: HEALDSBURG | Registered: Feb 2007
| :
|
|
BTLD GT
¯
Member # 5229
|
posted
You barley even spun that thing.u gonna leave where its at or take it higher?
--------------------
2000 Cobra R
Posts: 558 | From: livermore | Registered: Jan 2005
| :
|
|
|
|
68dustin
CAFords OG
Member # 5388
|
posted
Is that only @ 5100 rpm's? what should that thing red line at?
--------------------
"As I lay rubber down the street, I pray for traction that I can keep, and if I do begin to slide, please dear God protect me and my ride!"
Posts: 3986 | From: neverland | Registered: Feb 2005
| :
|
|
John91coupe
CAFords OG
Member # 18
|
posted
That pull went to around 5600 but other pulls went to 6000. No need to spin it much beyond 5500 because peak HP was at 5125.
--------------------
D-2R ProCharged R302 331
1.410 60 ft.
5.784 @ 122.92 1/8
8.953 @ 155.08
MM&FF Feature June 2003
Posts: 1361 | From: Grass Valley, CA | Registered: Sep 2000
| :
|
|
Fostang
¯
Member # 3752
|
posted
Seems kinda low no?
It's not even 1 hp per cubic inch.
--------------------
67' Fastback TT 408
67' Camaro Lsx
64' Corvette Fuelie
57' Chevy Bel Air Lsx
68’ Pony Convertible
66’ Pony Coupe
Posts: 3011 | From: Stockton/Danville | Registered: Nov 2003
| :
|
|
SydeWaySix
CAFords OG
Member # 3596
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Fostang:
Seems kinda low no?
It's not even 1 hp per cubic inch.
thats what I was thinking...those numbers are definitley nice, but for your setup I'd think you'd see higher numbers ![[Confused]](confused.gif)
--------------------
2013 Boss 302 #356. Performance White. Stock.
1965 Fastback GT Restored to stock spec.
Posts: 9882 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Dec 2002
| :
|
|
Raelsmar
¯
Member # 9804
|
posted
Around how much does a dyno cost? I wanna test my 85. Im sure they are low numbers but still, id like to know. Beaitiful car and nice numbers for you man. ![[Smile]](smile.gif)
--------------------
2010 Genesis 2.0T
If you can read this, then it's burrito time
Originally posted by 2T0NE
Niners deserve to lose
Raiders Lakers A's
Posts: 3768 | From: Vallejo, CA | Registered: Feb 2010
| :
|
|
Wildfire532FB
CAFords OG
Member # 1482
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by SydeWaySix:
quote:
Originally posted by Fostang:
Seems kinda low no?
It's not even 1 hp per cubic inch.
thats what I was thinking...those numbers are definitley nice, but for your setup I'd think you'd see higher numbers
Its a 532 and it made 617 crank HP. It made over 1 HP per cubic inch.
--------------------
./_ _ _ ___ __\
(]]]_ _ o _ _[[[)
|\_o_ __ __o_/|
|__|..........|__|
68 Fastback
84 CJ7
94 HMMWV
95 GT
03 F350
17 Fusion Hybrid
Posts: 17578 | From: 530 | Registered: Jun 2002
| :
|
|
Wildfire532FB
CAFords OG
Member # 1482
|
posted
On a side note, at 2200rpm it made 480ft/lbs of torque at the wheels.
--------------------
./_ _ _ ___ __\
(]]]_ _ o _ _[[[)
|\_o_ __ __o_/|
|__|..........|__|
68 Fastback
84 CJ7
94 HMMWV
95 GT
03 F350
17 Fusion Hybrid
Posts: 17578 | From: 530 | Registered: Jun 2002
| :
|
|
Pure Stang
¯
Member # 7251
|
posted
sick. good numbers man congrats ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
--------------------
HEART BREAKER
R.I.P Willie Guzman (5ltrsvt) you will be missed brother.
04/24/87 - 11/23/2012
90 lx 347 RIP
86 gt
89 lx- next project
Posts: 6497 | From: San Jose | Registered: Nov 2006
| :
|
|
Fostang
¯
Member # 3752
|
posted
I count rwhp not flywheel hp and there Are plenty of 302's making more than 1 rwhp on this board alone.
quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:
quote:
Originally posted by SydeWaySix:
quote:
Originally posted by Fostang:
Seems kinda low no?
It's not even 1 hp per cubic inch.
thats what I was thinking...those numbers are definitley nice, but for your setup I'd think you'd see higher numbers
Its a 532 and it made 617 crank HP. It made over 1 HP per cubic inch.
--------------------
67' Fastback TT 408
67' Camaro Lsx
64' Corvette Fuelie
57' Chevy Bel Air Lsx
68’ Pony Convertible
66’ Pony Coupe
Posts: 3011 | From: Stockton/Danville | Registered: Nov 2003
| :
|
|
Fostang
¯
Member # 3752
|
posted
Great torque and quick as would be expected from a bb
--------------------
67' Fastback TT 408
67' Camaro Lsx
64' Corvette Fuelie
57' Chevy Bel Air Lsx
68’ Pony Convertible
66’ Pony Coupe
Posts: 3011 | From: Stockton/Danville | Registered: Nov 2003
| :
|
|
Camara90
1%
Member # 134
|
posted
Car lookd fucking sick. Nice Job on the build
--------------------
92GT,stock short block,9:1 TFS 170's,perf rpm,custom cam,1 5/8 shorties,C4 trans.
std. 356hp, 350tq
11.85@111.9mph on motor.
Posts: 2351 | From: 707 | Registered: Jan 2001
| :
|
|
92stangLX
¯
Member # 3252
|
posted
WOW ![[Eek!]](eek.gif) The car turned out great.. post some more pics
Posts: 5302 | From: San Francisco | Registered: Sep 2003
| :
|
|
8stang8
¯
Member # 8082
|
posted
Nice #s!
What kinda carb you running? Did you play with the jetting or just baseline?
--------------------
Fox body coupe: 347, TKO, 3.73s, 9.93 @ 143
Posts: 1279 | From: s.f. | Registered: Dec 2007
| :
|
|
Pure Stang
¯
Member # 7251
|
posted
seems like it running just a little rich. there may be some stuff left on the table. but is a safe tune
--------------------
HEART BREAKER
R.I.P Willie Guzman (5ltrsvt) you will be missed brother.
04/24/87 - 11/23/2012
90 lx 347 RIP
86 gt
89 lx- next project
Posts: 6497 | From: San Jose | Registered: Nov 2006
| :
|
|
Yellow94GT
Mr. 60 FT
Member # 431
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Pure Stang:
seems like it running just a little rich. there may be some stuff left on the table. but is a safe tune
It isn't running rich. Ignore that "11.2 A/F" window. That is a measurement of the richest point on the graph. For Dana's car that little rich spot only happens right went transitioning to WOT then quickly recovers to the mid 12's where it stays the rest of the pull. ![[burnout]](graemlins/burnout.gif)
--------------------
AED
1994 GT Bucket that will likely never run
1999 SLOLEEN Twin Turbo Coyote
2008 F250 580 RWHP 1129 RWTQ
Posts: 5990 | From: Cameron Park, Ca | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
Yellow94GT
Mr. 60 FT
Member # 431
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 8stang8:
Nice #s!
What kinda carb you running? Did you play with the jetting or just baseline?
We had to change the jetting. The baseline pull was in the lower 11:1 A/F range.
--------------------
AED
1994 GT Bucket that will likely never run
1999 SLOLEEN Twin Turbo Coyote
2008 F250 580 RWHP 1129 RWTQ
Posts: 5990 | From: Cameron Park, Ca | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
trottin4.6
¯
Member # 8597
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Fostang:
I count rwhp not flywheel hp and there Are plenty of 302's making more than 1 rwhp on this board alone.
quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:
quote:
Originally posted by SydeWaySix:
quote:
Originally posted by Fostang:
Seems kinda low no?
It's not even 1 hp per cubic inch.
thats what I was thinking...those numbers are definitley nice, but for your setup I'd think you'd see higher numbers
Its a 532 and it made 617 crank HP. It made over 1 HP per cubic inch.
there was another fastback with a sbf on that same dyno 6 weeks ago that made over 1.1 RWHP per cubic inch at 11:5 to 1 through an auto. ask shaun about it, he did that motor. ![[worship]](graemlins/worship.gif)
Posts: 37 | From: 650 | Registered: Aug 2008
| :
|
|
fstryde3
¯
Member # 8436
|
posted
Sweet
Posts: 2950 | From: Sacramento | Registered: Jun 2008
| :
|
|
Fostang
¯
Member # 3752
|
posted
I think your talking about my homies red fastback.
quote:
Originally posted by trottin4.6:
quote:
Originally posted by Fostang:
I count rwhp not flywheel hp and there Are plenty of 302's making more than 1 rwhp on this board alone.
quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:
quote:
Originally posted by SydeWaySix:
quote:
Originally posted by Fostang:
Seems kinda low no?
It's not even 1 hp per cubic inch.
thats what I was thinking...those numbers are definitley nice, but for your setup I'd think you'd see higher numbers
Its a 532 and it made 617 crank HP. It made over 1 HP per cubic inch.
there was another fastback with a sbf on that same dyno 6 weeks ago that made over 1.1 RWHP per cubic inch at 11:5 to 1 through an auto. ask shaun about it, he did that motor.
--------------------
67' Fastback TT 408
67' Camaro Lsx
64' Corvette Fuelie
57' Chevy Bel Air Lsx
68’ Pony Convertible
66’ Pony Coupe
Posts: 3011 | From: Stockton/Danville | Registered: Nov 2003
| :
|
|
sic70stang
CAFords OG
Member # 4347
|
posted
Jesus this is outta control. respect the numbers and quit talking about Joe blows small block that did one HP per who gives a fuck.
--------------------
The anti-crew
1987 rolling safety violation.
Posts: 6940 | From: California | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
