|
Author
|
Topic: California introduces bill to exempt pre- 1981 vehicles.
|
|
|
NEIGHT
¯
Member # 8741
|
posted
 
 
They should bump it to '86 N under!
--------------------
-Savage Habits-
1992 Summer Edition
1986 Hatch- catfish killer
1964 Impala hard top
Posts: 18529 | From: EA$T $IDE REDWOOD CITY | Registered: Nov 2008
| :
|
|
|
|
Infamous5.0
CAFords OG
Member # 1745
|
posted
so all I have to do is email these senators and tell them how I feel? more than likely they will see my email as spam and delete in bulk emails
--------------------
To be or not to be
Posts: 2340 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Aug 2002
| :
|
|
sic70stang
CAFords OG
Member # 4347
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Infamous5.0:
so all I have to do is email these senators and tell them how I feel? more than likely they will see my email as spam and delete in bulk emails
Quit making the title of the email "enlarge your penis in 1 week" and it may have a chance. Lol
--------------------
The anti-crew
1987 rolling safety violation.
Posts: 6940 | From: California | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
Stang66
¯
Member # 10504
|
posted
That means I can have a bandit trans am and not worry about smog ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
--------------------
1966 Ford Mustang
1990 Notchback
1975 Pontiac Trans Am 400ci
Posts: 754 | From: Stockton | Registered: Dec 2010
| :
|
|
fstryde3
¯
Member # 8436
|
posted
Is this the Bill that will change the 30 year rule though? I heard a while back where they wanted to pass this in CA, the problem is a few years from now when your '84 and '85 and '87 were supposed to come up for smog exempt they no longer will because of this new Bill. Basically a 30 year old car will no longer apply no matter what year it is because the new Bill will only make it '81 and older. People think it's a good thing but I think it's another way for CA legislators to get over on people. I may be wrong about this but it would not surprise me.
Posts: 2950 | From: Sacramento | Registered: Jun 2008
| :
|
|
coupedup
¯
Member # 9987
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by SIC70STANG:
quote:
Originally posted by Infamous5.0:
so all I have to do is email these senators and tell them how I feel? more than likely they will see my email as spam and delete in bulk emails
Quit making the title of the email "enlarge your penis in 1 week" and it may have a chance. Lol
Lol
Posts: 4406 | From: Ca | Registered: May 2010
| :
|
|
sic70stang
CAFords OG
Member # 4347
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by fstryde3:
Is this the Bill that will change the 30 year rule though? I heard a while back where they wanted to pass this in CA, the problem is a few years from now when your '84 and '85 and '87 were supposed to come up for smog exempt they no longer will because of this new Bill. Basically a 30 year old car will no longer apply no matter what year it is because the new Bill will only make it '81 and older. People think it's a good thing but I think it's another way for CA legislators to get over on people. I may be wrong about this but it would not surprise me.
The way the law is now your pre 74 is exempt and There is no chance your your 84 85 86
--------------------
The anti-crew
1987 rolling safety violation.
Posts: 6940 | From: California | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
bentley mobs a stang
¯
Member # 11119
|
posted
Believe it or not, BARs plans and legislatures plans contradict each other. Legislations plans are in a nutshell to fuck over everybody. BAR is slowly trying to get rid of loaded emission testing (dyno) and make the testing OBD and visual based (the same way diesels are tested). Pre 96 cars are unable to be tested via OBD communication. By 2016-2020ish pre OBD2 cars will be few, and BAR will hopefully drop them from the California smog check program IF the California air resource board idiots will cooperate.
--------------------
We're here for a good time, not a long time.
Posts: 531 | From: East Bay | Registered: Jul 2011
| :
|
|
SwEeT03Gt
¯
Member # 10283
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by fstryde3:
Is this the Bill that will change the 30 year rule though? I heard a while back where they wanted to pass this in CA, the problem is a few years from now when your '84 and '85 and '87 were supposed to come up for smog exempt they no longer will because of this new Bill. Basically a 30 year old car will no longer apply no matter what year it is because the new Bill will only make it '81 and older. People think it's a good thing but I think it's another way for CA legislators to get over on people. I may be wrong about this but it would not surprise me.
they stopped car being smog exempt in 79' my dads toyota was supposed to smogged exempt but he is still required to smog it every 2 years ![[BS flag]](graemlins/bs_flag.gif)
Posts: 4484 | From: -NicKlE n DiMe- | Registered: Sep 2010
| :
|
|
slidewayz94
CAFords OG
Member # 3101
|
posted
If passed, it only excludes you from the biannual emissions testing. Your vehicle still has to have factory or CARB approved emission componets at all times.
Posts: 4251 | From: Sac | Registered: Jul 2003
| :
|
|
fstryde3
¯
Member # 8436
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by SwEeT 03 Gt:
quote:
Originally posted by fstryde3:
Is this the Bill that will change the 30 year rule though? I heard a while back where they wanted to pass this in CA, the problem is a few years from now when your '84 and '85 and '87 were supposed to come up for smog exempt they no longer will because of this new Bill. Basically a 30 year old car will no longer apply no matter what year it is because the new Bill will only make it '81 and older. People think it's a good thing but I think it's another way for CA legislators to get over on people. I may be wrong about this but it would not surprise me.
they stopped car being smog exempt in 79' my dads toyota was supposed to smogged exempt but he is still required to smog it every 2 years
Man that sucks. I gotta buy a classic or get the hell out of this Bullshit state!
[ March 15, 2012, 07:55 PM: Message edited by: fstryde3 ]
Posts: 2950 | From: Sacramento | Registered: Jun 2008
| :
|
|
wilit
Mustang Messiah
Member # 3367
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by SwEeT 03 Gt:
quote:
Originally posted by fstryde3:
Is this the Bill that will change the 30 year rule though? I heard a while back where they wanted to pass this in CA, the problem is a few years from now when your '84 and '85 and '87 were supposed to come up for smog exempt they no longer will because of this new Bill. Basically a 30 year old car will no longer apply no matter what year it is because the new Bill will only make it '81 and older. People think it's a good thing but I think it's another way for CA legislators to get over on people. I may be wrong about this but it would not surprise me.
they stopped car being smog exempt in 79' my dads toyota was supposed to smogged exempt but he is still required to smog it every 2 years
The 30 year rolling exemption ended in 2005. That's why only '75 and older are exempt from the bi-annual smog test. like it was mentioned, you still have to have all your smog equipment that came on the car.
--------------------
"If a man hasn't found something worth dying for, he isn't fit to live." - Martin Luther King Jr.
Posts: 4793 | From: 37.78514° North 122.40100° West | Registered: Oct 2003
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
