posted                             

quote:

---

Originally posted by 67stang:
Here is the comment from the fellow who tested the intake on his N/A 2V:

I was the N/A guinnea pig today. Not as good of results. We only gained about 7 peak horsepower and lost tons of torque in the powerband. The short runners just don't generate enough velocity without a blower. keep in mind that the blown car gained 55 hp over a Bullit intake. Just imagine what you'll get if you have a blower with a stock intake and you swap it out for one of these. THIS thing ROCKS with a blower.

So...how many GP commitments do we still have at $1400

---

they knew they were not going to see too big of gains on this intake as it sits on a N/A application as they did on a blown car. That is why they are making a smaller version, and changing the runner length and a few other things to increase velocity to make it see more mid-range power for those do not have full race set-ups or blowers.
So...how many GP commitments do we still have at $1400, which is not even a correct price "if" there was a GP.

[ December 18, 2002, 08:41 PM: Message edited by: 2000BlackGT ]

posted                             

quote:

---

Originally posted by 99gt-UJSTLST:
yea I noticed that the dynoe even on blown motor did gaim HP but over all it lost 25# torq hmm I think they need to up make the runners bigger to try to get more velocity and gain torq

---

you only charge $60 an hour for tech support and R&D right? LOL I talked to Reichard Racing today and they seem to know what they're doing with this intake.

posted                             

quote:

---

Originally posted by 2000BlackGT:

quote:

---

Originally posted by 99gt-UJSTLST:
yea I noticed that the dynoe even on blown motor did gaim HP but over all it lost 25# torq hmm I think they need to up make the runners bigger to try to get more velocity and gain torq

---

you only charge $60 an hour for tech support and R&D right? LOL I talked to Reichard Racing today and they seem to know what they're doing with this intake.

---

I hope they expand the runers to make more torq on both n/a and S/C

damm am I goin to have to make my own intake out of carbonfiber (it would be stronger then alluminum and run cooler than plastic wich runs cooler then sheet metal )im goin to school this people arent I think I might just have to

LOL

--------------------
SOUTH BAY STANGS
MINOR BOLT ON'S

www.southbaystangs.com

posted                             

quote:

---

they knew they were not going to see too big of gains on this intake as it sits on a N/A application as they did on a blown car. That is why they are making a smaller version, and changing the runner length and a few other things to increase velocity to make it see more mid-range power for those do not have full race set-ups or blowers.
So...how many GP commitments do we still have at $1400, which is not even a correct price "if" there was a GP. [/QB]

---