|
Author
|
Topic: 12s with gt40p's stock bottom end??
|
707clone
¯
Member # 10342
|
posted
 
 
yea i was thinking about taking my p heads off and sending em to robs machine shop in hayward and getting a 3 or 5 angle valve job, and getting the tfs valve spring kit with a swirl port job. big difference???
--------------------
Maybe I should get drunk off my HATERADE elsewhere?
I was slow to take the hint, so I'm taking a break from CAFords for the rest of the month. Now excuse me while I enjoy some cereal. Mmmmm Mmmmm good. Who else wants to join me?
Lil Ric!
R.I.P CHARLIE HUSTLE!
91gt p heads,b cam,3:55s,exhaust
89 coupe just startin on him
Posts: 2614 | From: v a dubble | Registered: Sep 2010
| :
|
|
nitrous_bob
CAFords OG
Member # 77
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by MikeD.:
Fuck yes it is.
Stock 302, Explorer intake, GT40ps, b303, 1.7s, 1-3/4 LTs. 2.73's and bald Mickeys.
i'll call BS
no way could you 1.94 60' and then get a 105 trap speed with 2.73's on that combo. i bet you sprayed it and dont wanna ante up
cuz it doesnt add up
and to the OP, it'll be tuff on 3.55's too, your relying on RPM and leverage when your under 300 HP, and the 3.55 wont give that to you
with 4.10's and 300 hp you can do mid 12's tho...my '89 did that all day long
13.20's on motor and 12.50's on a 75 shot
all stock motor just 4.10's , long tubes, and on a notch
--------------------
5.0 OG since 1990
Posts: 1402 | From: st clair shores MI | Registered: Nov 2000
| :
|
|
nitrous_bob
CAFords OG
Member # 77
|
posted
well i shouldnt be too cynical.....i should add that ...if your car doesnt weigh 2900 lbs it couldnt do that
he has a full weight GT that should go 3400-3500 with no driver on average
--------------------
5.0 OG since 1990
Posts: 1402 | From: st clair shores MI | Registered: Nov 2000
| :
|
|
Jaejae5.0
¯
Member # 7958
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 707clone:
yea i was thinking about taking my p heads off and sending em to robs machine shop in hayward and getting a 3 or 5 angle valve job, and getting the tfs valve spring kit with a swirl port job. big difference???
Why go that far?..fm machine did my heads fine..valve job new valves..springs etc..but if your gonna do that you might as well pick up a cheap set of edelbrock performers in the for sale section for 600$..jus sayin
Posts: 4890 | From: the combustion chamber | Registered: Oct 2007
| :
|
|
ItzStock
¯
Member # 9665
|
posted
My friend Mike just ran an 11.5 with a stock bottom end 302 with stock gt-40 heads. And that's ALL MOTOR! No accessories, Manifold, Dominator carb, electric water pump, longtubes, weight reduction and very limited susp mods.
He races at sac raceway for those that don't believe it.
[ July 10, 2012, 07:22 PM: Message edited by: ItzStock ]
Posts: 1394 | From: Vallejo, Ca | Registered: Dec 2009
| :
|
|
MikeD.
¯
Member # 8060
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by nitrous_bob:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by MikeD.:
[qb]
no way could you 1.94 60' and then get a 105 trap speed with 2.73's on that combo. i bet you sprayed it and dont wanna ante up
cuz it doesnt add up
and to the OP, it'll be tuff on 3.55's too, your relying on RPM and leverage when your under 300 HP, and the 3.55 wont give that to you
with 4.10's and 300 hp you can do mid 12's tho...my '89 did that all day long
13.20's on motor and 12.50's on a 75 shot
all stock motor just 4.10's , long tubes, and on a notch
Lol, Ok bud. You can ask Turbo50. When I ran those 12 second passes, the car had a stock rear end, 4cyl springs, and stock upper and lower control arms. I bought a 3.55 rear end off Turbo50, and never took it back. That car has never even seen the bottle. If I still had it I'd let you drive it. Granted it had some decently ported P's and a heavily ported Explorer.
Posts: 2854 | From: Vacaville Ca, 707 | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
|
|
707clone
¯
Member # 10342
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by ItzStock:
Here is his 11.9 from last year. He got it down to an 11.5 the last time i was out there a few weeks ago.
All Motor -stock bottom end 302 with stock gt40 heads
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6U-Jmov-bE0&list=UUmKOpTR0UCsiST3pPRifcUg&index=5&feature=plcp
nice vid. and jae,i was gonna get those edelbrocks on here but decided i want to keep the iron heads. if and when i run at the track it wont be often.you already know im more of a donut guy ![[Frown]](frown.gif)
--------------------
Maybe I should get drunk off my HATERADE elsewhere?
I was slow to take the hint, so I'm taking a break from CAFords for the rest of the month. Now excuse me while I enjoy some cereal. Mmmmm Mmmmm good. Who else wants to join me?
Lil Ric!
R.I.P CHARLIE HUSTLE!
91gt p heads,b cam,3:55s,exhaust
89 coupe just startin on him
Posts: 2614 | From: v a dubble | Registered: Sep 2010
| :
|
|
nitrous_bob
CAFords OG
Member # 77
|
posted
ok...so NOW we're talking reality
and i quote..........
"Granted it had some decently ported P's and a heavily ported Explorer."
that is NOT a stock explorer, stock p heads and 2.73 setup
so thank you...and yeah....i was right
im 20+ YEARS IN THIS 5.0 GAME , i know what works
why you would run a 2.73 is far far far beyond me, but im curious to see the time slips on that
and yes...still calling BS.....what else you gonna cough up?
heres my timeslip from my 1995 non pi headded 5.0 vert aod
all stock and 2.73's, 87 octane and 8* timing
--------------------
5.0 OG since 1990
Posts: 1402 | From: st clair shores MI | Registered: Nov 2000
| :
|
|
Duncan Motors
¯
Member # 7045
|
posted
don't be a engine stand racer dude lol. being a dyno queen, or time slip pimp all suck. enjoy your car, and do the best it can do.
Posts: 6310 | From: Vallejo | Registered: Sep 2006
| :
|
|
nitrous_bob
CAFords OG
Member # 77
|
posted
You know what...no comment
It takes a Good 260-275 hp to move 3100 lbs into the 12's
Every 100 lbs more is a tenth slower, and most gt's with a driver tag in about 3600
OP asked about his setup
[ July 11, 2012, 10:51 AM: Message edited by: nitrous_bob ]
--------------------
5.0 OG since 1990
Posts: 1402 | From: st clair shores MI | Registered: Nov 2000
| :
|
|
MikeD.
¯
Member # 8060
|
posted
Yup got me buddy! I was on a super budget, and didn't have te money for gears at the time. Just wanted to see what it would do down the 1320. But really I have nothing to his. That cars long gone. It ran titties, and for what was done it was a freak.
Honest to god (althought I don't believe in that bs) that car never saw spray, and never went down te track with anything other than 2.73s.
--------------------
1999 FRC Vette
12.77 @ 110
Posts: 2854 | From: Vacaville Ca, 707 | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
MikeD.
¯
Member # 8060
|
posted
Yup got me buddy! I was on a super budget, and didn't have te money for gears at the time. Just wanted to see what it would do down the 1320. But really I have nothing to his. That cars long gone. It ran titties, and for what was done it was a freak.
Honest to god (althought I don't believe in that bs) that car never saw spray, and never went down te track with anything other than 2.73s.
--------------------
1999 FRC Vette
12.77 @ 110
Posts: 2854 | From: Vacaville Ca, 707 | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
85staNg302
¯
Member # 9450
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by nitrous_bob:
haha...ok
of all the states who have the slowest cars......
no more coming from me
keep getting "sweet" info amongst yourselves
later guys.....i might pop in yearly from now on
howd that lawsuit go duncan ?
I ran 12.50 on e7s all motor no spray
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
Posts: 1561 | From: sacramento | Registered: Sep 2009
| :
|
|
Notch1320
Man Pedal
Member # 2647
|
posted
I have been 11.80 with unported E7's, stock unported intake and throttle body. There are a handfull of guys out there running 10.6-10.9 with unported E7's and GT-40 style heads.... all N/A.
12's is not a problem for the average guy with minimal effort. Most are just too lazy to try. It's nice to see a few on here trying to push stock parts while others take the easy way out.
Posts: 2349 | From: Yuba City, CA | Registered: Mar 2003
| :
|
|
turbo50
¯
Member # 6700
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by nitrous_bob:
ok...so NOW we're talking reality
and i quote..........
"Granted it had some decently ported P's and a heavily ported Explorer."
that is NOT a stock explorer, stock p heads and 2.73 setup
so thank you...and yeah....i was right
im 20+ YEARS IN THIS 5.0 GAME , i know what works
why you would run a 2.73 is far far far beyond me, but im curious to see the time slips on that
and yes...still calling BS.....what else you gonna cough up?
heres my timeslip from my 1995 non pi headded 5.0 vert aod
all stock and 2.73's, 87 octane and 8* timing
maybe on small nitrous if it really was all stock.
And Mike D.s car goes with those timeslips but the p heads are ported as was the intake...still hella budget I think he gave me 600 and a stock motor for that motor and I had to ring and bearing it, again.... lol
Nitrous bob know your shit but Mikey is legit
Posts: 7606 | From: Discovery Bay, California | Registered: Apr 2006
| :
|
|
MikeD.
¯
Member # 8060
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by turbo50:
quote:
Originally posted by nitrous_bob:
ok...so NOW we're talking reality
and i quote..........
"Granted it had some decently ported P's and a heavily ported Explorer."
that is NOT a stock explorer, stock p heads and 2.73 setup
so thank you...and yeah....i was right
im 20+ YEARS IN THIS 5.0 GAME , i know what works
why you would run a 2.73 is far far far beyond me, but im curious to see the time slips on that
and yes...still calling BS.....what else you gonna cough up?
heres my timeslip from my 1995 non pi headded 5.0 vert aod
all stock and 2.73's, 87 octane and 8* timing
maybe on small nitrous if it really was all stock.
And Mike D.s car goes with those timeslips but the p heads are ported as was the intake...still hella budget I think he gave me 600 and a stock motor for that motor and I had to ring and bearing it, again.... lol
Nitrous bob know your shit but Mikey is legit
Hey, I gave you 600, a stock motor and another set of gt40ps...
I am forever grateful of that though lol
--------------------
1999 FRC Vette
12.77 @ 110
Posts: 2854 | From: Vacaville Ca, 707 | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
