|
Author
|
Topic: WOW!!! This is really the FORD that many of you think is better than a CTS-V????
|
1Sicgt
CAFords OG
Member # 714
|
posted
 
 
Supercharged Boss 4 door sedan. Sexy isn't it.
> Boss 5.0 litre, supercharged DOHC 32 valve all-aluminium V8 engine
> Maximum power (DIN) – 335kW @ 5750rpm Maximum torque (DIN) – 570Nm @ 2200-5500rpm
> Bi-modal twin pipe quad outlet active exhaust system
> Brembo 6-piston brake calipers (front) with Brembo 4-piston brake calipers (rear)
> Performance leather sports seats with suede bolsters and GT-P logo embroidery
> Premium 5-spoke 19" alloy wheels with machined face and Silver accents
> Reverse camera with reverse sensing system
> Interior Command Centre (ICC) with advanced 8” colour touch screen and Bluetooth, USB & iPod connectivity
> Satellite navigation with Suna Traffic Message Control
> Sports projector headlamps
--------------------
14 Focus TS ST3 full Stg3, ready for bigger Turbo
2003 Cobra Track Car
Posts: 8145 | From: Hitting the Apex | Registered: Jan 2002
| :
|
|
1SLW4DR
¯
Member # 11498
|
posted
I'd trade my my sedan for that sedan fastttt
--------------------
03 mercury marauder
TireSmokingHooligan.
Posts: 612 | From: hayward | Registered: Dec 2011
| :
|
|
Boss 327
¯
Member # 9143
|
posted
I like the cts-v 4 door and wagon better than the SHO. Ford had a good idea but they really didnt deliver IMO. Now the aussie falcon, thats a different story ![[worship]](graemlins/worship.gif)
--------------------
"You'll never truly understand building engines until you can make power N/A. FI overshadows an engines defficiency." Al Papito
Posts: 1789 | From: East Bay | Registered: May 2009
| :
|
|
warhorse58gt
¯
Member # 7702
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by *EPIK*:
quote:
Originally posted by warhorse58gt:
welcome to cabowties.com! where fords get hated on, and ls1 are gods! ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
No Warhorse, Welcome to Cafords, where people that appreciate all makes get hated on, & Lee Iacocca is god!
This thread was a joke, just like the SHO is IMO... LOL
i feel you. that is how i feel about being on a ford site, where 50% don't even own a ford, and just cock ride ls1's
[ May 15, 2012, 05:25 PM: Message edited by: warhorse58gt ]
--------------------
WOLFPACK RACING
With guns, we are 'citizens'. Without them, we are 'subjects'.
83gt 354ci sbf 9.40 @ 143
77 cobra 2 171ci 97hp of pure fury!
Posts: 4200 | From: 209 | Registered: Jun 2007
| :
|
|
Gnari-Garage
CAFords OG
Member # 3164
|
posted
It doesn't matter how fast it is, at the end its still a Ford Taurus! ![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
[ May 15, 2012, 03:50 PM: Message edited by: NavidR ]
--------------------
2017 McLaren 570GT
2019 Audi S5
2017 Tundra 7" Lift, 37" Tires
Posts: 4017 | From: 916-sacramento | Registered: Aug 2003
| :
|
|
warhorse58gt
¯
Member # 7702
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by NavidR:
It doesn't matter how fast it is, at the end its still a Ford Taurus!
it was a called ford 500. but they wanted to bring back the old name plate, because of so many fond memories people had with the taurus.
--------------------
WOLFPACK RACING
With guns, we are 'citizens'. Without them, we are 'subjects'.
83gt 354ci sbf 9.40 @ 143
77 cobra 2 171ci 97hp of pure fury!
Posts: 4200 | From: 209 | Registered: Jun 2007
| :
|
|
sic70stang
CAFords OG
Member # 4347
|
posted
Some men just need to hop out of Cadillacs with their designer sunglasses and Gucci wallets.
--------------------
The anti-crew
1987 rolling safety violation.
Posts: 6940 | From: California | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
Saleen 00-768
¯
Member # 9379
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by *EPIK*:
only interested in Blue Oval wake up every morning to the soundtrack of Eaton blower whine & go to bed to the soundtrack of Fox Body Flowmaster exhaust notes ringing in their ears
Amen brotha
--------------------
'00 Saleen SC #768
'90 GT
'90 California Edition (sold)
'87 Saleen #264 (sold)
Posts: 1664 | From: NOR✯CAL | Registered: Aug 2009
| :
|
|
*EPIK*
¯
Member # 7481
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by SIC70STANG:
Some men just need to hop out of Cadillacs with their designer sunglasses and Gucci wallets.
LOL... My wallet is from Kohl's & cost $20 bucks so I know you aren't talking about me? What's wrong with wanting to drive something clean, refined, but with a beastly cammed out pushrod motor under the hood at the same time? If it had a modern 351W under the hood or a Coyote motor & a Blue Oval badge on it everyone would love it, plain & simple!
[ May 15, 2012, 11:21 PM: Message edited by: *EPIK* ]
--------------------
=91 Notch:12.31@110 **Under Construction**
=05 CTS-V: 418rwhp/393rwtq=13.01@111
http://www.djepikmusic.com
Posts: 6966 | From: 916 | Registered: Mar 2007
| :
|
|
2T0NE
Go 49ers
Member # 4216
|
posted
Versace shades burberry wallet hoppin out a terminator .Ls motors ftmfw
--------------------
Originally posted by x Raelsmar x:
Can't wait till the Giants lose tomorrow night so all you Giants fans are forced to shut the fuck up.
Posts: 14676 | From: 760 carlsbad | Registered: Mar 2004
| :
|
|
04 S281
¯
Member # 9229
|
posted
CTS-V > Taurus all day every day
But if I were in the market for a sport sedan, and it absolutely HAD to be American, I'd get a Pontiac G8 GXP and covert it to Holden Commodore HSV
Posts: 1570 | From: Sacramento | Registered: Jun 2009
| :
|
|
2T0NE
Go 49ers
Member # 4216
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 04 S281:
CTS-V > Taurus all day every day
But if I were in the market for a sport sedan, and it absolutely HAD to be American, I'd get a Pontiac G8 GXP and covert it to Holden Commodore HSV
FUCK YEAH,GO 49ERS
--------------------
Originally posted by x Raelsmar x:
Can't wait till the Giants lose tomorrow night so all you Giants fans are forced to shut the fuck up.
Posts: 14676 | From: 760 carlsbad | Registered: Mar 2004
| :
|
|
*EPIK*
¯
Member # 7481
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 04 S281:
CTS-V > Taurus all day every day
But if I were in the market for a sport sedan, and it absolutely HAD to be American, I'd get a Pontiac G8 GXP and covert it to Holden Commodore HSV
Sick besides the front fenders, wheels, & spoiler.
--------------------
=91 Notch:12.31@110 **Under Construction**
=05 CTS-V: 418rwhp/393rwtq=13.01@111
http://www.djepikmusic.com
Posts: 6966 | From: 916 | Registered: Mar 2007
| :
|
|
iron50
¯
Member # 11231
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by *EPIK*:
quote:
Originally posted by 04 S281:
CTS-V > Taurus all day every day
But if I were in the market for a sport sedan, and it absolutely HAD to be American, I'd get a Pontiac G8 GXP and covert it to Holden Commodore HSV
Sick besides the front fenders, wheels, & spoiler.
nice !!!!!!!!!! ilove red ![[Whoo Whooooo!]](graemlins/woowoo.gif)
--------------------
You mama
Posts: 2025 | From: san pablo cal | Registered: Aug 2011
| :
|
|
Wolfie351
¯
Member # 651
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by *EPIK*:
[QB] I don't see these very often on the road & came across this one today!
Considering Ford sells more SHOs than GM sells CTS-Vs, you haven't been looking very hard
[QB]A Ford Taurus SHO. Not a very impressive car looks wise IMO. @4,350lb curb weight, 360hp/350tq, I don't see one standing much a chance to a V. a 2005 CTS-V weighs in @3,850lbs, & is rated @405hp/395tq btw. [/QUOTE]
My S4 has the same power, less weight and AWD. Does that automatically make my Audi better than the Cadillac? Nope, nor do I feel the need to post Audi topics every time there's a fast one on YouTube.
[QB]I Can't believe many of you on here think this is a better car than a CTS-V???? I would've demolished this tuna boat if we could've lined up for a run....
[/QUOTE]
Yes, she SHO is a better overall car than your older CTS-V. Yours is a dinosaur compared to a SHO when it comes to luxury and technology. As for straight up acceleration, nowadays anyone can go as fast as they want to spend so there really isn't any point in bench racing anymore. There are 12 second ecoboost Ford Flexes out there so no big deal
--------------------
1985 Mustang GT: 351W, Griggs, Baer, etc etc
Posts: 1214 | From: South Bay | Registered: Dec 2001
| :
|
|
1996 GT
I'm Joe Yates
Member # 4992
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Wolfie351:
quote:
Originally posted by *EPIK*:
[QB] I don't see these very often on the road & came across this one today!
Considering Ford sells more SHOs than GM sells CTS-Vs, you haven't been looking very hard
[QB]A Ford Taurus SHO. Not a very impressive car looks wise IMO. @4,350lb curb weight, 360hp/350tq, I don't see one standing much a chance to a V. a 2005 CTS-V weighs in @3,850lbs, & is rated @405hp/395tq btw.
My S4 has the same power, less weight and AWD. Does that automatically make my Audi better than the Cadillac? Nope, nor do I feel the need to post Audi topics every time there's a fast one on YouTube.
[QB]I Can't believe many of you on here think this is a better car than a CTS-V???? I would've demolished this tuna boat if we could've lined up for a run....
[/QUOTE]
Yes, she SHO is a better overall car than your older CTS-V. Yours is a dinosaur compared to a SHO when it comes to luxury and technology. As for straight up acceleration, nowadays anyone can go as fast as they want to spend so there really isn't any point in bench racing anymore. There are 12 second ecoboost Ford Flexes out there so no big deal [/QUOTE]
I think an s4 shits on a ctsv, but if you compared the rs6 to the ctsv GAME OVER
--------------------
http://i.magaimg.net/img/257w.png
Posts: 9308 | Registered: Oct 2004
| :
|
|
*EPIK*
¯
Member # 7481
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Wolfie351:
quote:
Originally posted by *EPIK*:
[QB] I don't see these very often on the road & came across this one today!
Considering Ford sells more SHOs than GM sells CTS-Vs, you haven't been looking very hard
[QB]A Ford Taurus SHO. Not a very impressive car looks wise IMO. @4,350lb curb weight, 360hp/350tq, I don't see one standing much a chance to a V. a 2005 CTS-V weighs in @3,850lbs, & is rated @405hp/395tq btw.
My S4 has the same power, less weight and AWD. Does that automatically make my Audi better than the Cadillac? Nope, nor do I feel the need to post Audi topics every time there's a fast one on YouTube.
[QB]I Can't believe many of you on here think this is a better car than a CTS-V???? I would've demolished this tuna boat if we could've lined up for a run....
[/QUOTE]
Yes, she SHO is a better overall car than your older CTS-V. Yours is a dinosaur compared to a SHO when it comes to luxury and technology. As for straight up acceleration, nowadays anyone can go as fast as they want to spend so there really isn't any point in bench racing anymore. There are 12 second ecoboost Ford Flexes out there so no big deal [/QUOTE]
LOL... Your S4 is an overall NICER car than a 1st Gen CTS-V, but in stock trim makes no where near the same amount of power? How is 250hp/258tq the same as 400hp/395tq? Funny how everyone gets bent out of shape when I post ONE topic about a CTS-V running 9's, but they never notice that I post about Mustangs too, all the time. You guys live in the dark ages if you can't appreciate a cool car just because it has a GM badge on it....
Yeah, the SHO has more technological advances & more luxury, who cares it's a fuckin Taurus, & it's pretty bland IMO... Why am I not allowed to express MY PERSONAL opinion about a car that NOBODY on this site owns without getting bashed or hated on? Did I EVER say anything about ANY of your guys cars that you own? NO, I did NOT, but you guys all feel free to call my car gay, but I am willing to bet you have NEVER driven or been in a CTS-V...
I have an idea, why don't you guys find someone with a current gen Taurus to race me @ The Cafords carshow & we will no longer have to bench race.... Oh, I forgot, nobody on here owns one.... Why is that if they are SUCH cool cars????
[ May 16, 2012, 05:17 PM: Message edited by: *EPIK* ]
--------------------
=91 Notch:12.31@110 **Under Construction**
=05 CTS-V: 418rwhp/393rwtq=13.01@111
http://www.djepikmusic.com
Posts: 6966 | From: 916 | Registered: Mar 2007
| :
|
|
*EPIK*
¯
Member # 7481
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Cobra 93-4992:
quote:
Originally posted by Wolfie351:
quote:
Originally posted by *EPIK*:
[QB] I don't see these very often on the road & came across this one today!
Considering Ford sells more SHOs than GM sells CTS-Vs, you haven't been looking very hard
[QB]A Ford Taurus SHO. Not a very impressive car looks wise IMO. @4,350lb curb weight, 360hp/350tq, I don't see one standing much a chance to a V. a 2005 CTS-V weighs in @3,850lbs, & is rated @405hp/395tq btw.
My S4 has the same power, less weight and AWD. Does that automatically make my Audi better than the Cadillac? Nope, nor do I feel the need to post Audi topics every time there's a fast one on YouTube.
[QB]I Can't believe many of you on here think this is a better car than a CTS-V???? I would've demolished this tuna boat if we could've lined up for a run....
Yes, she SHO is a better overall car than your older CTS-V. Yours is a dinosaur compared to a SHO when it comes to luxury and technology. As for straight up acceleration, nowadays anyone can go as fast as they want to spend so there really isn't any point in bench racing anymore. There are 12 second ecoboost Ford Flexes out there so no big deal [/QUOTE]
I think an s4 shits on a ctsv, but if you compared the rs6 to the ctsv GAME OVER [/QUOTE]
S4's, RS4's, RS6's, all nicer cars than a CTS-V, BUT what is the price tag on all those bad boys? I will bet you the Cadi has WAY more bang for the buck, is FAR cheaper off the lot, & will run 11's, 10's, even 9's easier, & MUCH cheaper than the Audis, & will have FAR less issues....
--------------------
=91 Notch:12.31@110 **Under Construction**
=05 CTS-V: 418rwhp/393rwtq=13.01@111
http://www.djepikmusic.com
Posts: 6966 | From: 916 | Registered: Mar 2007
| :
|
|
phildog
¯
Member # 1214
|
posted
Arguing on the Internet is like winning the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you are still retarded.
I can't believe you guys are still beating this one to death.
Posts: 1554 | From: 510 | Registered: Apr 2002
| :
|
|
94 fobra
¯
Member # 8867
|
posted
You keep saying its a Taurus like a regular cts is any good those cars are pieces of shit ive driven a few and the interior and motor trans setups were dog shit...
--------------------
Im done with this ford vs chevy fight with "cafords" members. Aka big block 66 f100 but she's no longer:(
Posts: 2996 | From: Stockton | Registered: Jan 2009
| :
|
|
*EPIK*
¯
Member # 7481
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by phildog:
Arguing on the Internet is like winning the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you are still retarded.
I can't believe you guys are still beating this one to death.
Hey, I've been done with this argument, but peeps always have to come back with how EVERY car in the world is better than my car, or how much my car (that they've never been in) sucks! Funny thing is, THE ONLY car I see that someone in this thread actually owns (Besides me & my gay Cadi), or actually has been experienced 1st hand is a 2001 Audi S4.
--------------------
=91 Notch:12.31@110 **Under Construction**
=05 CTS-V: 418rwhp/393rwtq=13.01@111
http://www.djepikmusic.com
Posts: 6966 | From: 916 | Registered: Mar 2007
| :
|
|
*EPIK*
¯
Member # 7481
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Big block 66 f100:
You keep saying its a Taurus like a regular cts is any good those cars are pieces of shit ive driven a few and the interior and motor trans setups were dog shit...
New CTS is nice IMO, old base model CTS not so much... CTS-V, bet you've never been in or driven one....
So let me ask what it is you drive sir?
--------------------
=91 Notch:12.31@110 **Under Construction**
=05 CTS-V: 418rwhp/393rwtq=13.01@111
http://www.djepikmusic.com
Posts: 6966 | From: 916 | Registered: Mar 2007
| :
|
|
fstryde3
¯
Member # 8436
|
posted
LOL man some response here, stirred up a hornets nest LOL. I personally see it like this the CTS-V and SHO are just different, any performance Ford guy is gonna be looking at a Mustang or a Shelby wheras a Cadillac person may get the CTS cause it's a vette with 4 doors because what else are they gonna roll in the cadillac lineup?? I think they both look cool but the SHO is wayyy overpriced in my book so I'd have to look closely at the CTSv and I've driven nothing but Ford since my 16th Bday.
Posts: 2950 | From: Sacramento | Registered: Jun 2008
| :
|
|
94 fobra
¯
Member # 8867
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by *EPIK*:
quote:
Originally posted by Big block 66 f100:
You keep saying its a Taurus like a regular cts is any good those cars are pieces of shit ive driven a few and the interior and motor trans setups were dog shit...
New CTS is nice IMO, old base model CTS not so much...9 CTS-V, bet you've never been in or driven one....
So let me ask what it is you drive sir?
Your wrong ive driven a ctsv and a charged stsv
--------------------
Im done with this ford vs chevy fight with "cafords" members. Aka big block 66 f100 but she's no longer:(
Posts: 2996 | From: Stockton | Registered: Jan 2009
| :
|
|
94 fobra
¯
Member # 8867
|
posted
Depends on what day it is
--------------------
Im done with this ford vs chevy fight with "cafords" members. Aka big block 66 f100 but she's no longer:(
Posts: 2996 | From: Stockton | Registered: Jan 2009
| :
|
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
