Author
|
Topic: Turbo Fox Dyno Results
|
TURBOGT
¯
Member # 234
|
posted
Well I was hoping to crack 400rwhp but today wasn't the day. I did manage 381rhwp @ 5100rpm and 401ft/tq @ 4600rpm. All runs were at 19psi on a Mustang Dyno and I was able to drive her home as nothing broke Converted to flywheel horsepower I'm looking around the 475/500hp range and about 550rw/tq. I was hoping to split the block in half by trying to make more boost but the turbo wouldn't make for than 19psi.
I want to give a special thanks to Robs Machine Shop in Hayward, Ca as there were some technical glitches when I first got on the dyno and at first I thought I wasn't going to be able to run my car. But as they were unstrapping the car because they didn't think they were going to get the dyno working properly they fixed the problem and I was able to make my runs.
I have video but it will be a couple of weeks before I get it up. Here are some pics:
-------------------- when u want some, u know where to get some... http://www.turbomustangs.com/smf/index.php?topic=41851.0
Posts: 361 | From: Bay Area, Ca | Registered: Apr 2001
| :
|
|
Black 02 SS
¯
Member # 5939
|
posted
19psi on a stock bottom end? Niiiiice, and it didnt blow up!
-------------------- Schwinn 18speed
Posts: 949 | From: East Bay | Registered: Aug 2005
| :
|
|
Pure Stang
¯
Member # 7251
|
posted
very nice... congrats
-------------------- HEART BREAKER
R.I.P Willie Guzman (5ltrsvt) you will be missed brother. 04/24/87 - 11/23/2012
90 lx 347 RIP 86 gt 89 lx- next project
Posts: 6497 | From: San Jose | Registered: Nov 2006
| :
|
|
phat50
¯
Member # 1998
|
posted
Very impressive, congrats. [ August 02, 2007, 04:00 AM: Message edited by: phat50 ]
-------------------- New toy coming soon!
Posts: 2860 | From: Richmond / Valley jo/ Petaluma | Registered: Oct 2002
| :
|
|
|
GOT 50
¯
Member # 1960
|
posted
What size turbo?
at 19 psi you are probably creatibg heat instead of power. You might make more power at 14psi.
Eric
PS when you get a chance look up the flow chart. I am pretty positive that turbo will be way out of its effecincy range at that PSI with the CFM requirments of a V8
Posts: 2139 | From: SF/DALY CITY/MILLBRAE | Registered: Oct 2002
| :
|
|
Yellow94GT
Mr. 60 FT
Member # 431
|
posted
Stock HGs??
-------------------- AED
1994 GT Bucket that will likely never run 1999 SLOLEEN Twin Turbo Coyote 2008 F250 580 RWHP 1129 RWTQ
Posts: 5990 | From: Cameron Park, Ca | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
GOT 50
¯
Member # 1960
|
posted
PS looks awsome B&G turbo kit I presume.
Posts: 2139 | From: SF/DALY CITY/MILLBRAE | Registered: Oct 2002
| :
|
|
95slow50
¯
Member # 2804
|
posted
Nice... any aftermarket h/c/i?
-------------------- 1990 Mustang GT 5-Speed
Posts: 126 | From: El Dorado Hills/San Diego | Registered: May 2003
| :
|
|
GreyLX
¯
Member # 5601
|
posted
You should be making waaaay more than that @ 19 lbs.
-------------------- 93GT DSS331 incon800tti
Posts: 337 | Registered: Apr 2005
| :
|
|
Hungry Hippo
¯
Member # 537
|
posted
stock engine?
-------------------- 05 S4 Avant(wagon) 09 C6 H/C/I
Posts: 2959 | From: east bay | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
TURBOGT
¯
Member # 234
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by GOT 50: What size turbo?
at 19 psi you are probably creatibg heat instead of power. You might make more power at 14psi.
Eric
PS when you get a chance look up the flow chart. I am pretty positive that turbo will be way out of its effecincy range at that PSI with the CFM requirments of a V8
Sorry guys I don't know how to answer multiple quotes in the same reply so I'll answer each question one by one.
It's a T-67 and to be a 100% honest I'm not sure anymore of what wheels are in it but when I went from 15psi to 19psi there was a big seat of the pants feel when driving the car. If I would have up the boost and not felt anything different I would have put it back to 15psi. I think I gained about 50hp from adding 4psi.
-------------------- when u want some, u know where to get some... http://www.turbomustangs.com/smf/index.php?topic=41851.0
Posts: 361 | From: Bay Area, Ca | Registered: Apr 2001
| :
|
|
|
TURBOGT
¯
Member # 234
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by GOT 50: PS looks awsome B&G turbo kit I presume.
No it's a system I put together. It consists of:
1 5/8" JBA Headers turned around 2 1/2" crossover 3" Downpipe 44mm Tial Wastegate E-bay intercooler Summit 3" and 2.5" Steel piping for all the intake plumbing
I did copy there design though
-------------------- when u want some, u know where to get some... http://www.turbomustangs.com/smf/index.php?topic=41851.0
Posts: 361 | From: Bay Area, Ca | Registered: Apr 2001
| :
|
|
|
|
TURBOGT
¯
Member # 234
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by GreyLX: You should be making waaaay more than that @ 19 lbs.
Dyno numbers are different from dyno to dyno. Mustang dynos read lower numbers but I prefer to use them because they provide a true load to the engine when making a pull. I could have gone on a dynojet and made bigger numbers but my boost would come in way later and it's not a very good tool to get a close baseline for the street. I'm not bashing on other dynos but in my opinion a mustang dyno will get a tune the closest to a real world simulation.
-------------------- when u want some, u know where to get some... http://www.turbomustangs.com/smf/index.php?topic=41851.0
Posts: 361 | From: Bay Area, Ca | Registered: Apr 2001
| :
|
|
|
onesicklx
¯
Member # 285
|
posted
ive read on turbomustangs people making over 600rwhp on completely stock engines and smaller turbos...hmmm, maybe they used a different type of dyno, also is your car auto? maybe you lost some hp there...stil nice set up tho...
Posts: 1955 | From: san jose, CA | Registered: Jun 2001
| :
|
|
TURBOGT
¯
Member # 234
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by GreyLX: You should be making waaaay more than that @ 19 lbs.
Also just wanted to say that I'm running a lentech AOD also which robs alot more horsepower than a 5-speed.
-------------------- when u want some, u know where to get some... http://www.turbomustangs.com/smf/index.php?topic=41851.0
Posts: 361 | From: Bay Area, Ca | Registered: Apr 2001
| :
|
|
TURBOGT
¯
Member # 234
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by onesicklx: ive read on turbomustangs people making over 600rwhp on completely stock engines and smaller turbos...hmmm, maybe they used a different type of dyno, also is your car auto? maybe you lost some hp there...stil nice set up tho...
That was where I got the idea for my project. I was going to build a 331/AFR heads/R302/blah,blah,blah but I decided to try and grenade the stock motor and see if I could make the numbers those guys claimed. I think if they were on certain dynos and running through a 5-speed that the numbers they claim are a possibility. But dyno numbers are one thing. If the car can go to the track and run a ET or mph that matches with what the dyno says then it's all good. But if all they have is dyno numbers, your not really proving anything.
-------------------- when u want some, u know where to get some... http://www.turbomustangs.com/smf/index.php?topic=41851.0
Posts: 361 | From: Bay Area, Ca | Registered: Apr 2001
| :
|
|
|
GreyLX
¯
Member # 5601
|
posted
Gotcha, makes more sense now. You would prolly gain a whole lot of everything with some nice heads and intake.
-------------------- 93GT DSS331 incon800tti
Posts: 337 | Registered: Apr 2005
| :
|
|
SmokinLX
¯
Member # 1684
|
posted
Good #'s. Lockup or non lock converter?
-------------------- Dont claim power if ya cant mile per hour. 10 second AOD
Posts: 4388 | From: East Bay | Registered: Aug 2002
| :
|
|
95slow50
¯
Member # 2804
|
posted
damn those are some good numbers for such a high mileage stock 5.0L. where do you buy that stuff you wrap your headers/piping at?
-------------------- 1990 Mustang GT 5-Speed
Posts: 126 | From: El Dorado Hills/San Diego | Registered: May 2003
| :
|
|