T O P I C R E V I E W
|
Camaro Kid Z/28
Member # 3100
|
posted
since clevelands use the 1.72 rocker arm with trunions...has anyone tried using these on the 302's with any problems? i was thinking of putting these on for a low-buck upgrade?! your thoughts everyone? thanks for your time.
Ernesto
|
a50sn95
Member # 527
|
posted
Good Question. I honestly don't know the answer, but I've never heard of it being done. Since the "335" series is canted valve, I kind of doubt it. My guess is that they are too wide to fit next to each other in an inline configuration. It's been a few years since I've seen 351C rockers, but they did seem very wide. Anyway, if you have some, someone has to have a head off a car you can try them on....
|
Camaro Kid Z/28
Member # 3100
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by a50sn95: Good Question. I honestly don't know the answer, but I've never heard of it being done. Since the "335" series is canted valve, I kind of doubt it. My guess is that they are too wide to fit next to each other in an inline configuration. It's been a few years since I've seen 351C rockers, but they did seem very wide. Anyway, if you have some, someone has to have a head off a car you can try them on....
hmmm good point on the wideness of the rockers! i ll have to check into that! thanks!
|
BlownNOSMustang
Member # 158
|
posted
I have a 1993 302 Hatch. I have the Crane 1.7 rollers They work fine. I have had them for 10 years.
|
blind
Member # 3052
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by BlownNOSMustang: I have a 1993 302 Hatch. I have the Crane 1.7 rollers They work fine. I have had them for 10 years.
10 years ago when you got them were they originally sold for cleveland engines?
|