Post A Reply
read DMs/my profile
login
|
join CAFords
|
search
|
faq
|
»
Northern California Ford Owners
»
Automotive
»
General Talk
»
1998-2002 LS1 Camaro's
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by *EPIK*: [QB] Either way, both Mustangs & Camaro's have their strong & weak points. I am just saying, the Mustangs from the same time period as the LSX powered 4th Gen Camaro's don't really compare power wise or in bang for the buck... After owning a 32V Mach 1 & seeing how my car only trapped like 107-108 mph with full bolt ons & a tune was pretty disappointing. I personally will NEVER own another 32v Mustang unless it's a 2011+... My 03/04 had valve issues at only 50k miles, & that is unacceptable on an N/A car that's babied IMO... Now my fox body on the other hand & Fox's in general... Those cars impress me all the time. It has a stock bottom end 100k+ mile motor with a basic HCI setup, full exhaust, gears, power pipe, basic bolt ons, & an AC/Smog pump delete ran 12.31 @109. This was with Road race coil overs up front & eibach sport lines out back so the car had ZERO weight transfer & like a 1.85 60ft. Also I'm a track noob, so my driving isn't the best... Warhorse your car(s) are always impressive & I respect you... I just disagree with you about LSX motors... They are also impressive, can't deny that... Pushrods are where it's @ IMO.... [/QB][/QUOTE]
(
how?
)
Instant Emojis
Instant UBB Code
What is UBB Code?
Options
Disable smilies in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Questions/Requests/Suggestions? email CAFords
Fueled by
Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com