|
Author
|
Topic: Quadshocks?
|
93lx4cyl
¯
Member # 10517
|
posted
 
 
Not 100% sure if I saw this before BUT..quadshocks do they serve a purpose whatsoever? Only info I've seen is the info on 4x4s with them but a purpose on a fox? I hear drag cars remove em for weight but what about for a street car?
Posts: 204 | From: Sacramento | Registered: Dec 2010
| :
|
|
copcar
¯
Member # 10113
|
posted
They help quell wheel hop. Yes you need them, that is why they are on the car. On the street, with out them you run the risk of ripping out your torque boxes due to the wheel hop.
--------------------
12.37@ 109.34.NA 894DA Old Nitto 555 DR's Gt40 irons. B cam/1.7's, All emissions equipment on the car, stock air box. UPR catted X pipe.
Posts: 485 | Registered: Jun 2010
| :
|
|
American Iron Speed Shop
¯
Member # 6311
|
posted
They do very little and if there not new or have beed changed, probably doing nothing. most everyone takes them off. rather than spending a dime on quad shocks, i would invest in decent control arms.
--------------------
AmericanIronSpeedShop.com
Posts: 435 | From: Loomis Ca (sacramento) | Registered: Dec 2005
| :
|
|
fredfifty
Since
9/2010
Member # 10320
|
posted
how about using aftermarket rear control arms with quad shocks? is there any advantage in that?
--------------------
RIP EDSON VELORO
IM A NOOB, EXCUSE ME. THANKS.
92 LX Coupe 5.0 CARB'd BOLT-ONS SMOG LEGAL
62 Rag Impala
Posts: 4948 | Registered: Sep 2010
| :
|
|
CobramanPhil
¯
Member # 2170
|
posted
In my opinion...on a street car you need those quad shocks on there...even with aftermarket LCA..I'd say you need the quads still. If you are changing the stock configuration (i.e. MM LCAs/torque arm/panhard rod) then you don't need the quads anymore.
Posts: 1016 | From: California, Bay Area | Registered: Dec 2002
| :
|
|
Sydewayz_Stan
¯
Member # 10217
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by fredfifty:
how about using aftermarket rear control arms with quad shocks? is there any advantage in that?
Only if youre still getting wheel hop
--------------------
-90 Vert-SOLD
-91 Notch-SOLD
-2000 Explorer 5.0-SOLD
-72 Maverick-SOLD
-2004 GT, vortech V2 si, 10 psi-
-2002 F150 supercrew-
Posts: 3432 | From: 707 vallejo/richmond 510 | Registered: Aug 2010
| :
|
|
NEIGHT
¯
Member # 8741
|
posted
I don't run quadshocks, I have aftermarket upper/lower control arms so I have no wheel hop which is what quadshocks are for.
--------------------
-Savage Habits-
1992 Summer Edition
1986 Hatch- catfish killer
1964 Impala hard top
Posts: 18528 | From: EA$T $IDE REDWOOD CITY | Registered: Nov 2008
| :
|
|
5.0Abe
¯
Member # 11310
|
posted
Did a Kyb lowering struts and springs with upper and lowers no quad shocks and my car hooks up better with out the quad shock mad I wasted my money
Posts: 505 | From: Pittsburg CA. | Registered: Sep 2011
| :
|
|
coupedup
¯
Member # 9987
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by slocobra:
They do very little and if there not new or have beed changed, probably doing nothing. most everyone takes them off. rather than spending a dime on quad shocks, i would invest in decent control arms.
Wrong.... Shows how much experience you have had removing them. I thought you been doing this since I was in grade school ?
If you remove them your car will experience major wheel hop and like 79cobra stated you can potentially tear out the torque boxes.
Posts: 4406 | From: Ca | Registered: May 2010
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
