|
Author
|
Topic: Hp/ Tq numbers for project 5.0 Killer
|
67stang12s
¯
Member # 2314
|
posted
 
 
I have a 67 stang that cant quite beat 5.0s and so i was gonna build a buudget 302 motor from parts i have in the garage to go in my car and was wondering what yall think
and if anyone has any hp/tq figures or any 1/4 times
302 30 over
stock e7 heads
Isky 280 megacam
KB .200 dome pistons
edelbrock rpm air gap
Holley 750 dp
hedman shorty headers
2800 stall
3.50 gears
--------------------
The Heartbeat stops here
F O R D
Posts: 220 | From: 415 | Registered: Jan 2003
| :
|
|
JoeT
¯
Member # 298
|
posted
carb and intake sound too big, what are the specs on that cam? are the heads worked at all?
I'd guess around 230 rwhp as is, but E7 heads can make >300 rwhp if worked a good amount with the right parts.
--------------------
1984 Ford Tempo AOD--- RIP
Posts: 6785 | From: San Jose | Registered: Jun 2001
| :
|
|
mustanggt5091
All I need is.....
Member # 444
|
posted
What are the cam specs???? The carb seems to be a bit big, Id say a 600 or a 650 cfm carb instead, or keep the carb and get a set of better used heads for cheap! Or you can always buy a NX kit from me too!
[ September 04, 2003, 06:56 PM: Message edited by: mustanggt5091 ]
--------------------
88 GT 357w (SOLD):(
06 Limited Edition R6 !!!!!
Posts: 2353 | From: Fairfield / Santa Rosa , Ca | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
Hungry Hippo
¯
Member # 537
|
posted
that "mega cam" is probably too big too
--------------------
05 S4 Avant(wagon)
09 C6 H/C/I
Posts: 2959 | From: east bay | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
FasterDamnit
Bad Attitude
Member # 442
|
posted
Lose the heads. BIG waste of time. And let me know when you wan to race a high mileage 5.0...
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
Posts: 2971 | From: NorCal | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
67stang12s
¯
Member # 2314
|
posted
280-MEGA HYDRAULIC High performance.
Use/bracket racing. Lopey idle. 2500 Stall.
9.5-10.5:1 compr.
3:90-4:11 axle ratio.
Up to 780 CFM Carb. RPM-Range: 2500-6800
Valve Lift - INT: .517 EXT: .517
Valve Lash Hot - INT: .000 EXT: .000 ADV Duration - INT: 280° EXT: 280° .050 Duration - INT: 232° EXT: 232° Lobe Center: 108°
--------------------
The Heartbeat stops here
F O R D
Posts: 220 | From: 415 | Registered: Jan 2003
| :
|
|
67stang12s
¯
Member # 2314
|
posted
232 rwhp
as long as i can beat some 5.0s
thanx
is that the same 5.0 running 12.7
well when i get the 67 ready i'll run
i know about the heads being restrictive (planning on throwing on some gt 40s or vic jrs) and the carb being big(im thinking of a 650 dp instead) but the intake being too big is the first i heard about that but we shall see
anymore thoughts or testing partners preferrably 5.0s well any who thinks it'll be a good run
--------------------
The Heartbeat stops here
F O R D
Posts: 220 | From: 415 | Registered: Jan 2003
| :
|
|
FasterDamnit
Bad Attitude
Member # 442
|
posted
OK- Why use the poor flowing E7's? Early 289/302 castings are a bit better w/ smaller chambers for higher compression(54cc vs. 64cc)
Posts: 2971 | From: NorCal | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
67stang12s
¯
Member # 2314
|
posted
my compression will be too high for cheap ass 91gas and i have my 7k valve springs on the e7 heads i was supposed to port but didnt
basically just throwin something together for them 50s
--------------------
The Heartbeat stops here
F O R D
Posts: 220 | From: 415 | Registered: Jan 2003
| :
|
|
|
|
67stang12s
¯
Member # 2314
|
posted
thanks for the numbers but the short block is built already and the e7s are the only ones i have that can go on unless i open the chambers up on the 289 heads are use some fat gaskets
well we'll see
i appreciate the knowledge but i'm hard headed
non flowing E7s RULE
thanx
--------------------
The Heartbeat stops here
F O R D
Posts: 220 | From: 415 | Registered: Jan 2003
| :
|
|
FasterDamnit
Bad Attitude
Member # 442
|
posted
In that case, at least grind out the bumps in the ex. ports and clean the bowls. From one hardhead to another...
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
Posts: 2971 | From: NorCal | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
stoauto
¯
Member # 2803
|
posted
the rpm air gap will be fine, but for the carb i would probably go with a 600 dp or so. IMO try to port those stock heads atleast a little. you dont need new heads if your trying to build a BUDGET motor. Do your best with the stock heads, or better yet, just do what you can with whatever you got. save some money. ![[Cool]](cool.gif)
Posts: 1054 | Registered: May 2003
| :
|
|
95still5.0
¯
Member # 2994
|
posted
is the car auto or stick. if it is auto i don't think you'll beat 5.0's with that tranny. member 5.0's with T5 really fly over an automatic 5.0
--------------------
Abel Ibarra
Posts: 56 | From: San Jose, Ca | Registered: Jun 2003
| :
|
|
rr_mustang
¯
Member # 888
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 67stang12s:
non flowing E7s RULE
so, what does that suppoesed to mean, shitty stock heads kick ass? just wondering
--------------------
Dart 408 w/ AFR 205's
Posts: 473 | From: San Jose, CA | Registered: Feb 2002
| :
|
|
67stang12s
¯
Member # 2314
|
posted
95still5.0 thats were the stall gears cam etc come in at but maybe we can see if youre right when the car is ready
and maybe you can change your name a little bit if i win to 95lookslikeImStandingStill5.0
or i'll change mines to 67stang18s
--------------------
The Heartbeat stops here
F O R D
Posts: 220 | From: 415 | Registered: Jan 2003
| :
|
|
stoauto
¯
Member # 2803
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 67stang12s:
95lookslikeImStandingStill5.0
or i'll change mines to 67stang18s [/QB]
thats funny
with the stall and gears and the other shit your doing, you'll smoke a stock manual 5.0 no prob.
Posts: 1054 | Registered: May 2003
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
