This is topic Hp/ Tq numbers for project 5.0 Killer in forum Tech Talk at Northern California Ford Owners  .


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=6;t=005320

Posted by 67stang12s (Member # 2314) on :
 
I have a 67 stang that cant quite beat 5.0s and so i was gonna build a buudget 302 motor from parts i have in the garage to go in my car and was wondering what yall think
and if anyone has any hp/tq figures or any 1/4 times
302 30 over
stock e7 heads
Isky 280 megacam
KB .200 dome pistons
edelbrock rpm air gap
Holley 750 dp
hedman shorty headers
2800 stall
3.50 gears
 
Posted by shade- (Member # 298) on :
 
carb and intake sound too big, what are the specs on that cam? are the heads worked at all?

I'd guess around 230 rwhp as is, but E7 heads can make >300 rwhp if worked a good amount with the right parts.
 
Posted by mustanggt5091 (Member # 444) on :
 
What are the cam specs???? The carb seems to be a bit big, Id say a 600 or a 650 cfm carb instead, or keep the carb and get a set of better used heads for cheap! Or you can always buy a NX kit from me too!

[ September 04, 2003, 06:56 PM: Message edited by: mustanggt5091 ]
 
Posted by HungryHippo (Member # 537) on :
 
that "mega cam" is probably too big too
 
Posted by FasterDamnit (Member # 442) on :
 
Lose the heads. BIG waste of time. And let me know when you wan to race a high mileage 5.0...
[Big Grin]
 
Posted by 67stang12s (Member # 2314) on :
 
280-MEGA HYDRAULIC High performance.
Use/bracket racing. Lopey idle. 2500 Stall.
9.5-10.5:1 compr.
3:90-4:11 axle ratio.
Up to 780 CFM Carb. RPM-Range: 2500-6800
Valve Lift - INT: .517 EXT: .517
Valve Lash Hot - INT: .000 EXT: .000 ADV Duration - INT: 280° EXT: 280° .050 Duration - INT: 232° EXT: 232° Lobe Center: 108°
 
Posted by 67stang12s (Member # 2314) on :
 
232 rwhp
as long as i can beat some 5.0s
thanx
is that the same 5.0 running 12.7
well when i get the 67 ready i'll run
i know about the heads being restrictive (planning on throwing on some gt 40s or vic jrs) and the carb being big(im thinking of a 650 dp instead) but the intake being too big is the first i heard about that but we shall see
anymore thoughts or testing partners preferrably 5.0s well any who thinks it'll be a good run
 
Posted by FasterDamnit (Member # 442) on :
 
OK- Why use the poor flowing E7's? Early 289/302 castings are a bit better w/ smaller chambers for higher compression(54cc vs. 64cc)
 
Posted by 67stang12s (Member # 2314) on :
 
my compression will be too high for cheap ass 91gas and i have my 7k valve springs on the e7 heads i was supposed to port but didnt
basically just throwin something together for them 50s
 
Posted by FasterDamnit (Member # 442) on :
 
Stock E7's-
 -

Stock 289's-
 -

Stock 69 351W's-
 -

http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2000/07/homeporting/index.shtml

[ September 04, 2003, 08:15 PM: Message edited by: FasterDamnit ]
 
Posted by 67stang12s (Member # 2314) on :
 
thanks for the numbers but the short block is built already and the e7s are the only ones i have that can go on unless i open the chambers up on the 289 heads are use some fat gaskets
well we'll see
i appreciate the knowledge but i'm hard headed
non flowing E7s RULE
thanx
 
Posted by FasterDamnit (Member # 442) on :
 
In that case, at least grind out the bumps in the ex. ports and clean the bowls. From one hardhead to another...

[Wink]
 
Posted by stoauto (Member # 2803) on :
 
the rpm air gap will be fine, but for the carb i would probably go with a 600 dp or so. IMO try to port those stock heads atleast a little. you dont need new heads if your trying to build a BUDGET motor. Do your best with the stock heads, or better yet, just do what you can with whatever you got. save some money. [Cool]
 
Posted by 95still5.0 (Member # 2994) on :
 
is the car auto or stick. if it is auto i don't think you'll beat 5.0's with that tranny. member 5.0's with T5 really fly over an automatic 5.0
 
Posted by rr_mustang (Member # 888) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 67stang12s:
non flowing E7s RULE

so, what does that suppoesed to mean, shitty stock heads kick ass? just wondering
 
Posted by 67stang12s (Member # 2314) on :
 
95still5.0 thats were the stall gears cam etc come in at but maybe we can see if youre right when the car is ready [Wink]
and maybe you can change your name a little bit if i win to 95lookslikeImStandingStill5.0
or i'll change mines to 67stang18s [Cool]
 
Posted by stoauto (Member # 2803) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 67stang12s:
95lookslikeImStandingStill5.0
or i'll change mines to 67stang18s [Cool] [/QB]

thats funny [Big Grin]

with the stall and gears and the other shit your doing, you'll smoke a stock manual 5.0 no prob.
 




Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com