|
Author
|
Topic: another 300+hp gt40 combo
|
|
|
Luke87GT
Lay'n more stripes
than Caltrans
Member # 21
|
posted
 
 
JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?
If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.
If I were putting together a simple 302 combo for a fox, I'd mimick a Hi-Tech combo that used to be owned by AaronC (some of you might remember him). If memory serves me correctly, he laid down 341rwhp
--------------------
Stangless
Posts: 7802 | From: San Mateo | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
Blind
2.3L
CAFords OG
Member # 3052
|
posted
not much gt40 left about those heads besides the stock valve sizes, lol
--------------------
89 LX Notchback ex 4cyl, 14psi
02 Harley F150, 15psi
Posts: 8521 | From: Fairfield | Registered: Jul 2003
| :
|
|
Jaejae5.0
¯
Member # 7958
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Luke87GT:
JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?
If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.
If I were putting together a simple 302 combo for a fox, I'd mimick a Hi-Tech combo that used to be owned by AaronC (some of you might remember him). If memory serves me correctly, he laid down 341rwhp
well the port work done to my heads look very similar to that..so im hoping for the best ![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif) ...what did his combo consist of?
--------------------
1987 notchback h/c/i 302 & 70mm turbo SOLD
2000 camaro ss cam only
Posts: 4890 | From: the combustion chamber | Registered: Oct 2007
| :
|
|
|
|
Blind
2.3L
CAFords OG
Member # 3052
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 94 N.C.F. GT:
blind what does non ported gt40 heads look like
aluminum gt40's: 
gt40p's:
--------------------
89 LX Notchback ex 4cyl, 14psi
02 Harley F150, 15psi
Posts: 8521 | From: Fairfield | Registered: Jul 2003
| :
|
|
JohnB
Tech Moderator
Member # 969
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 94 N.C.F. GT:
what does non ported gt40 heads look like
Crap. That's what they look like. How do they flow? Imagine a girl trying to suck watermelon through a garden hose.
--------------------
1965 Shelby Cobra
1993 Cobra
2012 F150 Raptor
2020 GT500
Posts: 6523 | From: Orlando FL/Redding CA | Registered: Mar 2002
| :
|
|
SLOWBACK 67
¯
Member # 6348
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by JohnB:
quote:
Originally posted by 94 N.C.F. GT:
what does non ported gt40 heads look like
Crap. That's what they look like. How do they flow? Imagine a girl trying to suck watermelon through a garden hose.
^^^ and if you find a girl that can do that you need to marry her.
--------------------
Originally posted by turbo50:
I have no intenions of keeping anyones parts or taking anyones money.
Posts: 8582 | From: Vallejo | Registered: Dec 2005
| :
|
|
JohnB
Tech Moderator
Member # 969
|
posted
I said "trying", not that she "could". ![[Wink]](wink.gif)
--------------------
1965 Shelby Cobra
1993 Cobra
2012 F150 Raptor
2020 GT500
Posts: 6523 | From: Orlando FL/Redding CA | Registered: Mar 2002
| :
|
|
87TURBO
¯
Member # 9257
|
posted
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Luke87GT:
[QB] JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?
If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.
![[BS flag]](graemlins/bs_flag.gif)
my bros car with gt40s non ported,e cam,explore intake, 1.7r, 70m, full exshouse made 296rw 330tq
--------------------
turbo people
Posts: 403 | From: modesto/sanjose | Registered: Jun 2009
| :
|
|
MikeD.
¯
Member # 8060
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 87TURBO:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Luke87GT:
[QB] JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?
If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.
my bros car with gt40s non ported,e cam,explore intake, 1.7r, 70m, full exshouse made 296rw 330tq
Would have made more power with a stock cam and 1.7s ![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
[ July 20, 2010, 11:35 PM: Message edited by: MikeD. ]
--------------------
1999 FRC Vette
12.77 @ 110
Posts: 2854 | From: Vacaville Ca, 707 | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
87TURBO
¯
Member # 9257
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by MikeD.:
quote:
Originally posted by 87TURBO:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Luke87GT:
[QB] JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?
If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.
my bros car with gt40s non ported,e cam,explore intake, 1.7r, 70m, full exshouse made 296rw 330tq
Would have made more power with a stock cam and 1.7s
what are u taking about willis
--------------------
turbo people
Posts: 403 | From: modesto/sanjose | Registered: Jun 2009
| :
|
|
onesicklx
¯
Member # 285
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 87TURBO:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Luke87GT:
[QB] JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?
If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.
my bros car with gt40s non ported,e cam,explore intake, 1.7r, 70m, full exshouse made 296rw 330tq
he only said its posible..and not the norm..
Posts: 1955 | From: san jose, CA | Registered: Jun 2001
| :
|
|
92stangLX
¯
Member # 3252
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 87TURBO:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Luke87GT:
[QB] JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?
If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.
my bros car with gt40s non ported,e cam,explore intake, 1.7r, 70m, full exshouse made 296rw 330tq
You make it sound like it's a bad thing. These are some fuckin pretty good numbers for a set of iron heads and budget intake
Posts: 5302 | From: San Francisco | Registered: Sep 2003
| :
|
|
87TURBO
¯
Member # 9257
|
posted
[ July 20, 2010, 11:58 PM: Message edited by: 87TURBO ]
--------------------
turbo people
Posts: 403 | From: modesto/sanjose | Registered: Jun 2009
| :
|
|
87TURBO
¯
Member # 9257
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 87TURBO:
QUOTE]You make it sound like it's a bad thing. These are some fuckin pretty good numbers for a set of iron heads and budget intake
its a bad ass set up for the money
exactly ![[worship]](graemlins/worship.gif) i seen aftermarket h/c/i only make little over 300rw [/QB][/QUOTE]
--------------------
turbo people
Posts: 403 | From: modesto/sanjose | Registered: Jun 2009
| :
|
|
NvrGoFullRetard
CAFords OG
Member # 1633
|
posted
Aaronc's combo was, hi-tech built 306, afr 165's,custom grind hi-tech cam, "don't remember the cam specs, but I wouldn't say it anyways" and full exhaust, and a port
Port matched edelbrock intake. It put down 340 rwhp and roughly 320-360 tq
--------------------
"formally 4.6 eatin gm's"
white 97gt n/a 320rwhp/325rwtq
01 sierra rcsb lsx 408 (murdered out)
03 ecsb sierra 6.0 on 22's
2011 Tahoe
Posts: 2759 | From: PITTSBURG/FAIRFIELD | Registered: Aug 2002
| :
|
|
Luke87GT
Lay'n more stripes
than Caltrans
Member # 21
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 87TURBO:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Luke87GT:
[QB] JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?
If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.
my bros car with gt40s non ported,e cam,explore intake, 1.7r, 70m, full exshouse made 296rw 330tq
Probably uncorrected numbers...
Like I said before, it's possible, just not the norm.
Most guys would put down 265-280 with that combo.
--------------------
Stangless
Posts: 7802 | From: San Mateo | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
Jaejae5.0
¯
Member # 7958
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Luke87GT:
quote:
Originally posted by 87TURBO:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Luke87GT:
[QB] JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?
If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.
my bros car with gt40s non ported,e cam,explore intake, 1.7r, 70m, full exshouse made 296rw 330tq
Probably uncorrected numbers...
Like I said before, it's possible, just not the norm.
Most guys would put down 265-280 with that combo.
this is a gt40 combo ![[Smile]](smile.gif) ..11.8's! na pass..id like to see a 100 shot added to that
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMuUqP7U4g8
[ July 21, 2010, 03:18 AM: Message edited by: jaejae ]
--------------------
1987 notchback h/c/i 302 & 70mm turbo SOLD
2000 camaro ss cam only
Posts: 4890 | From: the combustion chamber | Registered: Oct 2007
| :
|
|
|
|
50Reasons
¯
Member # 6452
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Luke87GT:
quote:
Originally posted by 87TURBO:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Luke87GT:
[QB] JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?
If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.
my bros car with gt40s non ported,e cam,explore intake, 1.7r, 70m, full exshouse made 296rw 330tq
Probably uncorrected numbers...
Like I said before, it's possible, just not the norm.
Most guys would put down 265-280 with that combo.
My thoughts exactly and that would be with a tune!
--------------------
50Reasons Car Club President
Daniel/50Reasons
http://youtu.be/n_UkDg_F4MQ
https://youtu.be/066xRvxKy-g
Posts: 9483 | From: Sacramento Ca | Registered: Jan 2006
| :
|
|
LQ9SN95
¯
Member # 7080
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 4.6 EATIN GM'S:
Aaronc's combo was, hi-tech built 306, afr 165's,custom grind hi-tech cam, "don't remember the cam specs, but I wouldn't say it anyways" and full exhaust, and a port
Port matched edelbrock intake. It put down 340 rwhp and roughly 320-360 tq
those cam specs are no secret.....at least not now anyway. they are .224/.222 .555/.528 111Lsa
i have somethin similar in my car.
[ July 21, 2010, 06:16 AM: Message edited by: SPTVENM ]
--------------------
http://www.fastgms-teamfast.com
http://www.facebook.com/aop.fresno?ref=ts&fref=ts
Lq9 swap
102 fast intake
Trick flow heads
T rex cam
Posts: 8031 | From: Fresno, Ca | Registered: Sep 2006
| :
|
|
Notch1320
Man Pedal
Member # 2647
|
posted
300 plus is attainable with even with unported E7's.
It's all in the combination... I would guess that "most" of these claims in this post are skewed/uncorrected dyno numbers though.
Try doing over 300 with unported and stock sized valved E7's, stock lift cam, stock intake, stock TB, and a stock bottom end.... There are about 12 people who are well above the 300HP mark limited by these parts... It takes some serious dedication though.
Posts: 2349 | From: Yuba City, CA | Registered: Mar 2003
| :
|
|
Luke87GT
Lay'n more stripes
than Caltrans
Member # 21
|
posted
Friends don't let's friends approach a dyno discussion without SAE Corrected numbers...
--------------------
Stangless
Posts: 7802 | From: San Mateo | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
SF Coupe
¯
Member # 1810
|
posted
Lot simpler with the tried and true AFR/FTI combo.
Posts: 1082 | From: SF | Registered: Sep 2002
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
![[Whoo Whooooo!]](graemlins/woowoo.gif)
