This is topic another 300+hp gt40 combo in forum General Talk at Northern California Ford Owners  .


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=043198

---

Posted by jaejae (Member # 7958) on :
 
http://forums.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=1093086
 

---

Posted by Luke87GT (Member # 21) on :
 
JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?

If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.

If I were putting together a simple 302 combo for a fox, I'd mimick a Hi-Tech combo that used to be owned by AaronC (some of you might remember him). If memory serves me correctly, he laid down 341rwhp
 

---

Posted by Blind (Member # 3052) on :
 


not much gt40 left about those heads besides the stock valve sizes, lol
 

---

Posted by jaejae (Member # 7958) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Luke87GT:
JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?

If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.

If I were putting together a simple 302 combo for a fox, I'd mimick a Hi-Tech combo that used to be owned by AaronC (some of you might remember him). If memory serves me correctly, he laid down 341rwhp

---

well the port work done to my heads look very similar to that..so im hoping for the best ...what did his combo consist of?
 

---

Posted by 94 N.C.F. GT (Member # 3946) on :
 
blind what does non ported gt40 heads look like
 

---

Posted by Blind (Member # 3052) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by 94 N.C.F. GT:
blind what does non ported gt40 heads look like

---

aluminum gt40's:

gt40p's:

 

---

Posted by JohnB (Member # 969) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by 94 N.C.F. GT:
what does non ported gt40 heads look like

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by JohnB:

quote:

---

Originally posted by 94 N.C.F. GT:
what does non ported gt40 heads look like

---

Crap. That's what they look like. How do they flow? Imagine a girl trying to suck watermelon through a garden hose.

---

^^^ and if you find a girl that can do that you need to marry her.
 

---

Posted by JohnB (Member # 969) on :
 
I said "trying", not that she "could".
 

---

Posted by 87TURBO (Member # 9257) on :
 
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Luke87GT:
[QB] JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?

If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.

my bros car with gt40s non ported,e cam,explore intake, 1.7r, 70m, full exshouse made 296rw 330tq
 

---

Posted by MikeD. (Member # 8060) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by 87TURBO:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Luke87GT:
[QB] JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?

If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.

my bros car with gt40s non ported,e cam,explore intake, 1.7r, 70m, full exshouse made 296rw 330tq

---

Would have made more power with a stock cam and 1.7s

[ July 20, 2010, 11:35 PM: Message edited by: MikeD. ]
 

---

Posted by 87TURBO (Member # 9257) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by MikeD.:

quote:

---

Originally posted by 87TURBO:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Luke87GT:
[QB] JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?

If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.

my bros car with gt40s non ported,e cam,explore intake, 1.7r, 70m, full exshouse made 296rw 330tq

---

Would have made more power with a stock cam and 1.7s

---

what are u taking about willis
 

---

Posted by onesicklx (Member # 285) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by 87TURBO:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Luke87GT:
[QB] JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?

If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.

my bros car with gt40s non ported,e cam,explore intake, 1.7r, 70m, full exshouse made 296rw 330tq

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by 87TURBO:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Luke87GT:
[QB] JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?

If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.

my bros car with gt40s non ported,e cam,explore intake, 1.7r, 70m, full exshouse made 296rw 330tq

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by 87TURBO:
QUOTE]You make it sound like it's a bad thing. These are some fuckin pretty good numbers for a set of iron heads and budget intake

---

its a bad ass set up for the money
exactly i seen aftermarket h/c/i only make little over 300rw [/QB][/QUOTE]
 

---

Posted by 4.6 EATIN GM'S (Member # 1633) on :
 
Aaronc's combo was, hi-tech built 306, afr 165's,custom grind hi-tech cam, "don't remember the cam specs, but I wouldn't say it anyways" and full exhaust, and a port
Port matched edelbrock intake. It put down 340 rwhp and roughly 320-360 tq
 

---

Posted by Luke87GT (Member # 21) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by 87TURBO:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Luke87GT:
[QB] JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?

If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.

my bros car with gt40s non ported,e cam,explore intake, 1.7r, 70m, full exshouse made 296rw 330tq

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Luke87GT:

quote:

---

Originally posted by 87TURBO:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Luke87GT:
[QB] JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?

If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.

my bros car with gt40s non ported,e cam,explore intake, 1.7r, 70m, full exshouse made 296rw 330tq

---

Probably uncorrected numbers...
Like I said before, it's possible, just not the norm.

Most guys would put down 265-280 with that combo.

---

this is a gt40 combo ..11.8's! na pass..id like to see a 100 shot added to that
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMuUqP7U4g8

[ July 21, 2010, 03:18 AM: Message edited by: jaejae ]
 

---

Posted by Yaterstang (Member # 7659) on :
 
Lets say you had this engine in your fox, how much to the wheel could you really get?

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/FMS-M-6007-XEFMS/
 

---

Posted by 50Reasons (Member # 6452) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Luke87GT:

quote:

---

Originally posted by 87TURBO:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Luke87GT:
[QB] JaeJae, it's possible but not the norm. And who knows how much port work those heads/intake currently have?

If you or I put those parts on unported, we'd be lucky to see 275-280rwhp with a tune.

my bros car with gt40s non ported,e cam,explore intake, 1.7r, 70m, full exshouse made 296rw 330tq

---

Probably uncorrected numbers...
Like I said before, it's possible, just not the norm.

Most guys would put down 265-280 with that combo.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by 4.6 EATIN GM'S:
Aaronc's combo was, hi-tech built 306, afr 165's,custom grind hi-tech cam, "don't remember the cam specs, but I wouldn't say it anyways" and full exhaust, and a port
Port matched edelbrock intake. It put down 340 rwhp and roughly 320-360 tq

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by JohnB:

quote:

---

Originally posted by 94 N.C.F. GT:
what does non ported gt40 heads look like

---

Crap. That's what they look like. How do they flow? Imagine a girl trying to suck watermelon through a garden hose.

---

Hahaaa LoL
 

---

Posted by 87TURBO (Member # 9257) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Luke87GT:
Friends don't let's friends approach a dyno discussion without SAE Corrected numbers...

---

these number are on a dyno jet, car made 444rw 593tq on 100shot on a tnt wet kit with 116 only on juice, got the dyno graph
 

---

Posted by Luke87GT (Member # 21) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by 87TURBO:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Luke87GT:
Friends don't let's friends approach a dyno discussion without SAE Corrected numbers...

---

these number are on a dyno jet, car made 444rw 593tq on 100shot on a tnt wet kit with 116 only on juice, got the dyno graph

---

Sorry I haven't the slightest clue what you are talking about.
 

---

Posted by 87TURBO (Member # 9257) on :
 
i know
 

---