|
Author
|
Topic: What's your 0-60mph based on track results? link.
|
|
|
z pyro
¯
Member # 3745
|
posted
 
 
I've never been to the track, but it takes 10 seconds for me to hit 60...
--------------------
'95 Integra LS
'08 Buell XB12R Firebolt
'65 Mustang 289 - soon to be 306
Posts: 1732 | From: Fresno, CA | Registered: Nov 2003
| :
|
|
Stimson
_
Member # 51
|
posted
Not bad.... 5.2 seconds with a stock motor and DOT tires ![[burnout]](graemlins/burnout.gif)
Posts: 2373 | Registered: Jun 2000
| :
|
|
Elapid
GOROBGO
Member # 50
|
posted
i guess i'll have to find my timeslips...
3.26 for the LX
3.10 for the cobra...
[ February 02, 2004, 11:23 PM: Message edited by: Elapid ]
--------------------
98 Cobra
83 Notch rolling chassis - fs
Posts: 1797 | From: Grass Valley, CA USA | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
2stangs69-91
¯
Member # 1951
|
posted
cool I have never figured it before 1.98 in the 69. I have felt it in my back also. It is a good pain
--------------------
69 Mustang on hold
1991 LX hatch getting a make over
1994 F150 4X4 351
2006 Yamaha V-max 1200 Modded
Posts: 3711 | From: Redding | Registered: Oct 2002
| :
|
|
BlackNGold
CaliforniaFords.com
Moderator
Member # 655
|
posted
Well, when I hit a 13.626 @ 102.121 with a 2.0 60ft...My 1/8 mile was 8.778 and a 1/8mile trap of 80.417, so that = 4.89 0-60... ![[Smile]](smile.gif)
Wow, thats interesting to compare those #'s to other manufatures car specs...It sucks, because I never found the true potential of my Mustang...The next run I was able to hook up and hit a 13.651 @ 99.317 with a 1.876 60ft backfiring bad after my shifts...Oh well ![[Frown]](frown.gif) ...
Great link Jim... ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
--------------------
-SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT-
Posts: 5132 | From: Bay Area, CA | Registered: Dec 2001
| :
|
|
TheBrain
I'm the Real
John Force
Member # 35
|
posted
2.75 seconds
Not bad
Brian
--------------------
1989 LX vert 342
11.662 @ 116.65 1.57 60ft. N/A
10.227 @ 134.59 1.41 60ft 200 shot 3600lbs
2003 Ranger 4 door
15.99 @ 87
Posts: 1264 | From: Back in Redding CA | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
spegull03
¯
Member # 2842
|
posted
im slow compared to you guys, 5.42 seconds
Posts: 874 | From: Folsom | Registered: May 2003
| :
|
|
03GT281
¯
Member # 2944
|
posted
4.83 ITS WEAK
Posts: 218 | From: FF-707/EDH-916 | Registered: Jun 2003
| :
|
|
John91coupe
CAFords OG
Member # 18
|
posted
Hehe, mine is 1.64 seconds.
--------------------
D-2R ProCharged R302 331
1.410 60 ft.
5.784 @ 122.92 1/8
8.953 @ 155.08
MM&FF Feature June 2003
Posts: 1361 | From: Grass Valley, CA | Registered: Sep 2000
| :
|
|
98slowhoe 'FIFTYLX'
Uncle Frank
Member # 895
|
posted
Man when my ol Hunk of junk ran it was a 4.78 0-60 car
--------------------
AKA Franky Freaking 5 liter
Advanced Engine Development
SCT dealer
Dynotuning
Engine building
916*275*8212
88 4runner on 42's
Posts: 4206 | From: Folsom | Registered: Feb 2002
| :
|
|
FasterDamnit
Bad Attitude
Member # 442
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by John91coupe:
Hehe, mine is 1.64 seconds.
Showoff! ![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
--------------------
'92 LX T5
Looked stock, went 11's 11.90 at 115mph.
'65 Mustang 347
www.fordmuscle.com
Livin' in the Carolina Pines
Posts: 2971 | From: NorCal | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
season'd 88
¯
Member # 169
|
posted
I got 4.83 ![[Confused]](confused.gif) somehow that doesnt sound right...what the hell.
Posts: 1383 | Registered: Feb 2001
| :
|
|
66 AC COBRA
Nitrous King
Member # 904
|
posted
3.96 seconds, on 17" street tires, not dr's, also first time to track
[ February 02, 2004, 09:40 PM: Message edited by: 66 AC COBRA ]
--------------------
FFR AC Cobra
72 Vega - WCHRA Extreme 10.5
Posts: 6280 | From: Winters | Registered: Feb 2002
| :
|
|
66 AC COBRA
Nitrous King
Member # 904
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by season'd 88:
I got 4.83 somehow that doesnt sound right...what the hell.
yeah thats not right
--------------------
FFR AC Cobra
72 Vega - WCHRA Extreme 10.5
Posts: 6280 | From: Winters | Registered: Feb 2002
| :
|
|
FasterDamnit
Bad Attitude
Member # 442
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by season'd 88:
I got 4.83 somehow that doesnt sound right...what the hell.
enter your 1/8th mile stats. Not 1/4 and not 1000ft. Should be around 7.3 and 96 or so.
Posts: 2971 | From: NorCal | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
season'd 88
¯
Member # 169
|
posted
ok, i got 3.23 on my last run. ![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif) The best times from Drew didnt show the 1/8
Posts: 1383 | Registered: Feb 2001
| :
|
|
gixxer408
¯
Member # 2454
|
posted
0 to 60mph in 0.66 seconds. That possible??? ![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
Posts: 413 | From: SJ | Registered: Feb 2003
| :
|
|
Elapid
GOROBGO
Member # 50
|
posted
looks like you'd be pulling 3.6 gees if the acceleration is linear (it's not).
ooof!
that's a lotta force!
you know that's the same force, approximately, that the space shuttle astronauts endure at launch!
[ February 04, 2004, 07:04 AM: Message edited by: Elapid ]
--------------------
98 Cobra
83 Notch rolling chassis - fs
Posts: 1797 | From: Grass Valley, CA USA | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
gixxer408
¯
Member # 2454
|
posted
4.60@161 is the best 1/8th mile times on the car. That calculator must be broken. LOL!
Posts: 413 | From: SJ | Registered: Feb 2003
| :
|
|
Elapid
GOROBGO
Member # 50
|
posted
sounds about right...
why do you think it' sbroken?
that's one helluva 1/8 mile!
![[worship]](graemlins/worship.gif)
--------------------
98 Cobra
83 Notch rolling chassis - fs
Posts: 1797 | From: Grass Valley, CA USA | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
