T O P I C R E V I E W
|
Jerm95gt
Member # 1239
|
posted
I got edelbrock 6037's and keeping stock injectors. 1.7 rr's
I ordered a crane2031 but its back ordered for a few days.......i'm thinking maybe I should have gotten the e303.......does anyone know hte pro's/cons of them.......I like a cool idle but im also all about reliablity... and power....thanks
|
93PONY
Member # 60
|
posted
I just swapped out an E303 on 91PONY's car. Swapped it for the X & it idles as smooth as the E. I swapped the cam, ported the lower intake to match the heads, & swapped the BBK high-flow catted H for an off-road BBK X & gained ~4mph in the 1/4. She went from running 105mph to 109mph. She runs 1.6 rockers. For 1.7's the B will perform nearly as well.
All of these cams will pass smog.
BTW...the cam was NOT put in dot-to-dot.
|
st5150
Member # 51
|
posted
91PONY had good luck with the X cam. 67stang ran similar or slighly better numbers with another cam, I forgot the maker, but it wasn't FMS, comp or crane.
|
Jerm95gt
Member # 1239
|
posted
is the ecam as reliable as the crane 2031 etc..
if the power is the same, the reliability is the same, and the ecam just sounds cooler i kinda want it instead. [ June 03, 2003, 03:30 PM: Message edited by: Jerm95gt ]
|
MR GO FAST
Member # 2088
|
posted
ECAM
|
93PONY
Member # 60
|
posted
IMO the E is not as good as the 2031.
But with 1.7's it's better then 1.6's.
I'm not impressed with the performance of the E. For blown applications it's better....but for N/A...there's better cams that are the same price (~$100 used) & will give better performance.
The E has been known to give idle fits. I've been able to make them idle smooth as low as 700rpm, but that's on the more tolerant Fox-body computers. Of course...the X & B are no better at idling. [ June 03, 2003, 03:35 PM: Message edited by: 93PONY ]
|
MR GO FAST
Member # 2088
|
posted
I agree on that 93pony. I will have a custom one done for myself eventually. I got my Ecam cheap and it runs goods for my 150hp 302
|
66 AC COBRA
Member # 904
|
posted
the e cam isnt bad with 1.7's, thats what i have, but i would rather have a b cam if i was gonna stick with ford alphabet soup
|
shade-tree
Member # 298
|
posted
There's a guy on the Corral named Glenn (screenname) that ran 11.8s @ 114 w those heads and a 'baby' crower cam. Might poke around and do a search on the corral to find which one, or just PM him and ask. [ June 03, 2003, 04:06 PM: Message edited by: shade-tree ]
|
FasterDamnit
Member # 442
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by st5150: 91PONY had good luck with the X cam. 67stang ran similar or slighly better numbers with another cam, I forgot the maker, but it wasn't FMS, comp or crane.
Lunati 51023, specifications are 215/224 duration at 0.050" lift, and .522" lift on both the intake and exhaust valve. The cam has a lobe separation angle of 112 degrees. Edelbrock 6037's, and Performer intake. (In an '88 LX)
12.85 @ 108.2 on 1.76 60ft.
http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2001/08/efimotor/index.shtml
|
AaronC
Member # 86
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by shade-tree: There's a guy on the Corral named Glenn (screenname) that ran 11.8s @ 114 w those heads and a 'baby' crower cam. Might poke around and do a search on the corral to find which one, or just PM him and ask.
the baby crower (pt. # 15510) is a 212/212 114 LSA .531/.531 cam. Glenn ran the 15512 cam 222/228 112 lsa .496/.512 His car (11.8 coupe) is also 2900-3000 lbs. That same setup ran a high 12 at 107 in his 95 cobra too
|
1 FLy5Oh
Member # 2425
|
posted
im lookin for a good powerfull cam...i want a something that is very aggressive...any suggestions?
i am going to put a blower on down the line..but in the mean time imm doing a h/c/i and i was thinkin about the ford victor jr heads or gt-40s or the trick flows not sure which ones yet
|
93PONY
Member # 60
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 1 FLy5Oh: im lookin for a good powerfull cam...i want a something that is very aggressive...any suggestions?
i am going to put a blower on down the line..but in the mean time imm doing a h/c/i and i was thinkin about the ford victor jr heads or gt-40s or the trick flows not sure which ones yet
Vic Jr's are great for blown...so are TW's... Personally I like the Highports even better...or some AFR185's. You don't need an aggressive cam to make gobs of power with a blower. But...there are plenty of mild street cams that'll give plenty of power N/A & perform quite well with a blower. Compcams XE274HR on a 112LSA is one of them. TFS stage 1 does pretty good blown, but not so hot N/A. TFS stage 2 does better N/A & Blown...but I'd opt for the XE274 first.
The limitation is smog...only one of those cams will pass the sniffer. [ June 03, 2003, 09:58 PM: Message edited by: 93PONY ]
|
1 FLy5Oh
Member # 2425
|
posted
well im waiting on the blower...about 6 months...but my car is going to need smog in the next month and it will pass asside from the o/r pipe....but as soon as i get that done im going to put in the h/c/i..so untill then i want a mean ass sounding cam that runs as hard as it sounds =)
|