|
Author
|
Topic: What will my car run?
|
Jeff S
¯
Member # 371
|
posted
 
 
Combo is naturally aspirated as follows:
331ci 8.75:1 compression ratio
TFS high ports 311/230 @ .600 lift
AFM B-4 cam(same as TFS stage 2)
Holley intake
75mmm TB
1 3/4" long tube headers
3" into 2.5" exhuast
3.55 gears
TKO
![[burnout]](graemlins/burnout.gif)
--------------------
'90 Mustang LX: 8.53 @ 157.92 w/ 1.33 60' on DR's
'10 ZR1: FOR SALE
'14 E63 S: RENNtech ECU
'04 Gallardo: UGR TTG
Posts: 2121 | From: San Jose, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
jayl
¯
Member # 185
|
posted
13.0@104 with a 1.7 on slicks ![[Razz]](tongue.gif) ![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
--------------------
Facebook.com/TeamTemporary
8.5's TTFBitch!
Posts: 3821 | From: Hayward | Registered: Mar 2001
| :
|
|
Jeff S
¯
Member # 371
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by jayl:
13.0@104 with a 1.7 on slicks
You're kidding right? ![[Confused]](confused.gif)
--------------------
'90 Mustang LX: 8.53 @ 157.92 w/ 1.33 60' on DR's
'10 ZR1: FOR SALE
'14 E63 S: RENNtech ECU
'04 Gallardo: UGR TTG
Posts: 2121 | From: San Jose, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
WANARNM
¯
Member # 587
|
posted
Low 12..on motor.
[ April 30, 2003, 03:43 PM: Message edited by: WANARNM ]
--------------------
89’ Hatch. Completely stock.
Posts: 1390 | From: San Jose | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
93PONY
Mr. Valve Events
Member # 60
|
posted
Naturally aspired?!?
uh...something happen?
12.2 @112mph
--------------------
www.advancedenginedevelopment.com
SCT dealer
Dynotuning
(916)715-7569
Posts: 4266 | From: Fair Oaks, CA | Registered: Nov 2000
| :
|
|
67stang12s
¯
Member # 2314
|
posted
i would think around there but lets say high 12s
what happened to the blower?
--------------------
The Heartbeat stops here
F O R D
Posts: 220 | From: 415 | Registered: Jan 2003
| :
|
|
|
|
season'd 88
¯
Member # 169
|
posted
with or without the blower in your sig?
Posts: 1383 | Registered: Feb 2001
| :
|
|
66 AC COBRA
Nitrous King
Member # 904
|
posted
im gonna throw in the 11.99 on et drags if u are a great driver
and what happened to the novi 2k???
--------------------
FFR AC Cobra
72 Vega - WCHRA Extreme 10.5
Posts: 6280 | From: Winters | Registered: Feb 2002
| :
|
|
WANARNM
¯
Member # 587
|
posted
High 11's on slicks.. with a 1.5 or 1.4 60ft. Hee-hee
--------------------
89’ Hatch. Completely stock.
Posts: 1390 | From: San Jose | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
season'd 88
¯
Member # 169
|
posted
8.75:1 comp seems a bit weak for n/a maybe low twelves
Posts: 1383 | Registered: Feb 2001
| :
|
|
JoeT
¯
Member # 298
|
posted
I'd guess high 11's granny shifting with a 1.6 or better launch.
--------------------
1984 Ford Tempo AOD--- RIP
Posts: 6785 | From: San Jose | Registered: Jun 2001
| :
|
|
Jeff S
¯
Member # 371
|
posted
The Novi is is being taken off the car and i'm sending it back to Paxton for repairs. The seal is already gone(leaking oil into my discharge tubes) with ~350 miles on it. ![[Mad]](mad.gif)
I suprised that you guys think it will only run 12's on slicks. I'll be on 17" Nittos BTW. I'm thinking 11.9's on the Nitto's is reasonable. Only one way to find out though.
[ April 30, 2003, 03:59 PM: Message edited by: Jeff S ]
--------------------
'90 Mustang LX: 8.53 @ 157.92 w/ 1.33 60' on DR's
'10 ZR1: FOR SALE
'14 E63 S: RENNtech ECU
'04 Gallardo: UGR TTG
Posts: 2121 | From: San Jose, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
Primer GR40
¯
Member # 476
|
posted
paxton sucks
--------------------
Superdupercharged Cobra
No Transmatic Notch
Posts: 2108 | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
93PONY
Mr. Valve Events
Member # 60
|
posted
I bet a T76 would really wake that thing up. ![[Wink]](wink.gif)
--------------------
www.advancedenginedevelopment.com
SCT dealer
Dynotuning
(916)715-7569
Posts: 4266 | From: Fair Oaks, CA | Registered: Nov 2000
| :
|
|
Jeff S
¯
Member # 371
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 93PONY:
I bet a T76 would really wake that thing up.
Must.....say.....noooooooo.
Posts: 2121 | From: San Jose, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
93PONY
Mr. Valve Events
Member # 60
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Jeff S:
quote:
Originally posted by 93PONY:
I bet a T76 would really wake that thing up.
Must.....say.....noooooooo.
You sure? Man, these HP kits are freakin' nice! They come with 1 3/4 headers....& an electric fan. ![[worship]](graemlins/worship.gif)
Gotta have some fun with you! ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
--------------------
www.advancedenginedevelopment.com
SCT dealer
Dynotuning
(916)715-7569
Posts: 4266 | From: Fair Oaks, CA | Registered: Nov 2000
| :
|
|
JoeT
¯
Member # 298
|
posted
just imagine what that car would pick up with a Shaun-cam ![[Whoo Whooooo!]](graemlins/woowoo.gif)
--------------------
1984 Ford Tempo AOD--- RIP
Posts: 6785 | From: San Jose | Registered: Jun 2001
| :
|
|
93PONY
Mr. Valve Events
Member # 60
|
posted
Wouldn't you know it...that 'weak-nuts' cam I have sitting in the garage would be a near perfect fit.
--------------------
www.advancedenginedevelopment.com
SCT dealer
Dynotuning
(916)715-7569
Posts: 4266 | From: Fair Oaks, CA | Registered: Nov 2000
| :
|
|
Jeff S
¯
Member # 371
|
posted
OMG... I feel so stupid right now. I'm suprised nobody asked this, since it's just a bit difficult to estimate a ET/MPH without knowing a vehicles weight. My car wieghs 3350 with driver.
[ May 01, 2003, 02:36 AM: Message edited by: Jeff S ]
--------------------
'90 Mustang LX: 8.53 @ 157.92 w/ 1.33 60' on DR's
'10 ZR1: FOR SALE
'14 E63 S: RENNtech ECU
'04 Gallardo: UGR TTG
Posts: 2121 | From: San Jose, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
Stimson
_
Member # 51
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 93PONY:
I bet a T76 would really wake that thing up.
I have to agree. Jeff needs to practice what he preaches and ditch that TFS cam for a custom cam, ditch the Novi to go turbo and ditch the TFS heads for AFR 185's. Its kinda shady for him to promote super-duper AFR's, custom cams and turbos when in his garage sits(sat) a S trim'd, TFS headed off the shelf the cam car ![[Smile]](smile.gif)
We already know the car runs 10.6's@134mph with an S trim, off the shelf cam and TFS heads.
The NA combo you listed sounds similar to TheBrain's old 331. He had AFR 165's, TFS-2 cam and a GT40 intake. I think it made 315 rwhp and ran 112 mph in a heavy vert. You have more head and intake than him, not to mention less weight. I'm going to guess 350 rwhp all motor and 115 mph just because its been so long that you've made a pass down the track, your skills aren't up to par compared to TheBrain
So what happened to the Novi2000 and Ed Curtis super-duper-fly custom cam?
[ May 01, 2003, 10:49 AM: Message edited by: st5150 ]
Posts: 2373 | Registered: Jun 2000
| :
|
|
Jeff S
¯
Member # 371
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by st5150:
I have to agree. Jeff needs t practice what he preaches and ditch that TFS cam, ditch the Novi to go turbo and ditch the TFS heads for AFR 185's. Its kinda shady for him to promote super-duper AFR's, custom cams and turbos when in his garage sits(sat) a S trim'd, TFS headed off the shelf the cam car ... So what happened to the Novi2000 and Ed Curtis super-duper-fly custom cam?
I have never once stated nor promoted that AFR heads are better than TFS. For the record, if I were to re-build my combo I would use the exact same heads. For forced induction applications I have not seen any other head give as good of results on the amount of cars as the TFS heads have. For NA combo's it seems that the past 2 years the AFR heads have been the "head of choice" giving the best results for most combo's.
Regarding the custom cam, I do have an FTI cam on my shelf and like I have stated in the past I plan on doing some back to back dyno tests with the current cam against the FTI custom cam and I and will post the results for all to see.
Regarding the tubo vs. supercharger issue. I have never stated that turbo's are "better". I have stated that turbo's take less HP to operate, that they are more efficient, and make more power at a given boost level when properly sized compared to a properly sized centrifugal supercharger. Their are advantages and disadvantages to each. I choose a blower for my own reasons(cost, ease of install, the fact it looks "SICK" ).
[ May 01, 2003, 10:37 AM: Message edited by: Jeff S ]
--------------------
'90 Mustang LX: 8.53 @ 157.92 w/ 1.33 60' on DR's
'10 ZR1: FOR SALE
'14 E63 S: RENNtech ECU
'04 Gallardo: UGR TTG
Posts: 2121 | From: San Jose, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
91 5.0
¯
Member # 1527
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Blown Mystic:
paxton sucks
--------------------
02 GT - Zinc Yellow
91 5.0 LX - Red
Posts: 1316 | From: Fairfield | Registered: Jul 2002
| :
|
|
hidnn.o.s.
¯
Member # 1219
|
posted
I am thinking HIGH 12's to low 13's by changing NOTHING but removing the Novi. Eithier way, let us know.
--------------------
R.I.P. Willie G. You are missed on this forum
Posts: 15950 | Registered: Apr 2002
| :
|
|
Jeff S
¯
Member # 371
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by hidnn.o.s.:
I am thinking HIGH 12's to low 13's by changing NOTHING but removing the Novi. Eithier way, let us know.
The only change being made will be the tune and the gas.
--------------------
'90 Mustang LX: 8.53 @ 157.92 w/ 1.33 60' on DR's
'10 ZR1: FOR SALE
'14 E63 S: RENNtech ECU
'04 Gallardo: UGR TTG
Posts: 2121 | From: San Jose, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
