T O P I C R E V I E W
|
93lx306nos
Member # 1001
|
posted
is there gonna be one of those mustang vs. camaro grudge nights this summer?
|
1sicklx
Member # 1018
|
posted
you ran that 12.2 all motor...
|
93lx306nos
Member # 1001
|
posted
yah ran it all motor.i tkink it has a 12.0 in it now.the old intake was ported way to much.
|
89hatchback_lx
Member # 587
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 93lx306nos: yah ran it all motor.i tkink it has a 12.0 in it now.the old intake was ported way to much.
Is there such a thing as porting a intake too much???
|
jayl
Member # 185
|
posted
there sure is! if you just hollow something without maintaining a velocity port then your just dumpin in air instead of having it accelerate through.........at least in my opinion......
|
93lx306nos
Member # 1001
|
posted
yah the problem was that the heads had a much smaller port than the intake so the velocity of the air going into the motor was slowed down and then the diff in port size would also cause alot of turbulence which would kill power.i hope that somewhat explains it.
|
sic91sleeper
Member # 779
|
posted
Bigger is not always better, its the same thing if you use to big of a throttle body and/or heads.
|