Post A Reply
read DMs/my profile
login
|
join CAFords
|
search
|
faq
|
»
Northern California Ford Owners
»
Automotive
»
General Talk
»
1998-2002 LS1 Camaro's
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Robb: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by 04 S281: [qb] So... we went from comparing showroom stock to showroom stock, and now we're talking about what would qualify for stock eliminator class? It has weight reduction, suspension, tires, etc etc... oh but it's "stock" because that's what the rule book says? Doesn't change the fact the 4th gen F-body has a better motor, better chassis, better suspension design, and better transmission than a Foxbody. Motor to Motor: when do you seen stock unopened longblock smogable 302's with cam only pumping out 400rwhp on pump gas? Chassis to Chassis: Do F-bodies need full length subframe connectors? Do they rip their own torque boxes? Suspension: How many cars of ANY MAKE and MODEL do you see CONVERTING to the inverted Macpherson front strut, or 4-link rear end design found in a Fox? How many Mustangs do you see converting to panhard rod/torque arm and Short/Long Arm front? Transmission: How often do Viper and Vette and Cobra R owners ditch that weak T-56 and put in a manly T-45? The F-body isn't perfect. It's pig heavy, most of the car besides the drivetrain is put together like crap. The dinky 10-bolt rearend is weak. and it's got love-it or hate-it looks... and in the end I wouldn't own one. I can however acknowledge it's strengths. [/qb][/QUOTE]Im just playing around with all the different directions this is being taken in lol. Next itll probably be fasted gutted race car. [/QB][/QUOTE]
(
how?
)
Instant Emojis
Instant UBB Code
What is UBB Code?
Options
Disable smilies in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Questions/Requests/Suggestions? email CAFords
Fueled by
Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com