Post A Reply
read DMs/my profile
login
|
join CAFords
|
search
|
faq
|
»
Northern California Ford Owners
»
Automotive
»
Drag Racing
»
who's got the fast NA 302 around? what about NA 281?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by 67stang: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by st5150: [qb]Good point.... if carbs are allowed, '67stang' ran a 11.9 with his solid roller 302. [/qb][/QUOTE] Heck 11.99 is nothing for a carbed NA 302. There are plenty of high-compression 289's and 302's running low 10's. My '67 weighs 3280 with me and fuel, so in terms of weight, its on par with an LX hatch. Best 60ft was a 1.62 on ET streets, best mph is 116. '89 roller bottom end, no special parts other than main studs. 9.4:1 compression. heads were World Sr. irons, out of the box. intake is a vic jr. carb is a modified 750 DP cam was a crane solid roller (238/246 ~.560" lift) [IMG]http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2000/02/project1199/launch_tp.JPG[/IMG] [/QB][/QUOTE]
(
how?
)
Instant Emojis
Instant UBB Code
What is UBB Code?
Options
Disable smilies in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Questions/Requests/Suggestions? email CAFords
Fueled by
Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com