Post A Reply
read DMs/my profile
login
|
join CAFords
|
search
|
faq
|
»
Northern California Ford Owners
»
Automotive
»
General Talk
»
Kenne Bell'N..
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Brandonn: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Mr.10psi: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Brandonn: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Mr.10psi: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Brandonn: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Mr.10psi: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by CornOil_&_Boost: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Greasy: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Mr.10psi: [qb] car fucking moves great, but something doesnt add up, how does your car trap only 130mph when 600rwhp cobras trap 130 all day and your making 678rwhp at only 19psi on a kb 2.2 Not trying to bash but AEDS dyno reads super high. All in all the cars fucking sick. peace [/qb][/QUOTE]I'd say the dyno numbers are right on par for the mods same with qtr mile, I trapped 132 with 764RW on ET Streets with a 2.3 60ft. [/qb] Drew trapped 135 with a terminator and 750rw....Terminators just don't trap as high as your theory Mr. Low psi... [/qb][/QUOTE]Really, prove me wrong. This guys makes 640rwhp and runs 10.03 at 133. Thats 110rwhp less than the 750 you mentioned and only traps 2mph less. You do the math. :D [/qb][/QUOTE]You can't get to hung up on that. there is a lot of variables. My old car weighed 3400, 6 speed with 348 hp and ran 11.88 at 117. Dannys car was at full weight prob close to 3700 lbs, on street tires, on a wednesday night. that dude was on a fully preped track and got to use it all the way down. as good as brandon left, it was still spinning down track. [/qb][/QUOTE]haha my bad, i was referring to the mph the guy ran in the video not the et. Case in point, mph is less effected by error as is et, so for whoever thinks that if you spin it will effect your mph needs to do their homework. Variances are minimal and not enough to justify. If someone makes a shit ton of hp on the dyno and if it does not back up mph on the strip , its a high reading dyno. Its that simple. If you cant run 10.9 at 129 minimum with 580rwhp and stock weight, stock irs, stock gear cobra,stock 6spd you need to jump out of the driver seat or fix the car cuz that is just sad.Not disrespecting anyone at all, just my views and opinion thats all.Do i really need to put up more evidence haha. Obviously more props to for running the time u did in your camaro, i would call that driver mod for sure. [/qb][/QUOTE]Thats not a true staitment. if my car or bike spins the first 60 feet then the mph will go up. I have worked at the track for 17 years. and have made a few passes down the track and will argue that with you all day, less traction on the bottom will make mph go up [/qb][/QUOTE]You are absolutely right if the car spins only in the 60ft and regains maximum traction the rest of the 1/4 mile, only then will it increase 1 to 2mph tops. Just like i said earlier not enough to justify or argue the difference considering both runs would have to be identical in everything such as shift points, time spent in between shifts,tire pressure,da,humidity, temperature, and all other things that effect mph, such as slipping clutch or spark plug blowout. etc know what i mean... [/qb][/QUOTE]Maybe in a 110-115 mph car, for example, my car would solid 1.45-1.47 short time, and run 116-118, if it spun to a 1.60 it would go 118-122. in the nova it goes 1.28-1.22 short time. it spins to say a 1.4 it will pick up 10-14 [/QB][/QUOTE]
(
how?
)
Instant Emojis
Instant UBB Code
What is UBB Code?
Options
Disable smilies in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Questions/Requests/Suggestions? email CAFords
Fueled by
Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com