Post A Reply
read DMs/my profile
login
|
join CAFords
|
search
|
faq
|
»
Northern California Ford Owners
»
Automotive
»
General Talk
»
prop 8 (update)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Slowback67: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by sic70stang: [qb] where do u draw the line? do we allow people that think its okay to marry 4 people now get married to be fair. or what about some idiot that wants to marry his dog, i know thats extreme but whos to say it wont happen. marriage needs to be defined and the voters tried to do that. [/qb][/QUOTE]You do bring up a very good point. There needed to be a define meaning of married. ( because people have less common sence and need thing's put into law. ;) ) What about paligamy? (how ever it's spelled ) what about the age required to be married???? Wouldn't be unfair now to say age OR number of partners SHOULD be a factor? This could open the door for an aquital's for people caught having more then one husband, wife and even underage. People of the same sex can already get domestic parterships and recieve all the tax and health benifits. So why do gay and lesbian right's leaders keep pushing for more? Does it REALLY matter to them? Or are they just trying to attack religious beliefs of our country? [/QB][/QUOTE]
(
how?
)
Instant Emojis
Instant UBB Code
What is UBB Code?
Options
Disable smilies in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Questions/Requests/Suggestions? email CAFords
Fueled by
Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com