Post A Reply
read DMs/my profile
login
|
join CAFords
|
search
|
faq
|
»
Northern California Ford Owners
»
Automotive
»
General Talk
»
Further proof that hybrids suck.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by iceman302: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by 88DroptopGT: [qb] The whole article seemed to be Prius bashing the whole time. The description of labeling the Prius a "Gas Guzzler" on the headline despite having an average 2-3 mpg less and using 1 gallon more per tank. Converting their currency figures: The 520d cost: 27,190.00 GBP = $54,304.02 USD The Prius cost: 20,677.00 GBP = $41,296.22 USD (A $13,0007.80 difference neglecting the 3% CCD) Compared to the U.S MSRP the Prius imported to Europe costs about $10k - $12k more but is still $13k CHEAPER than the BMW. Imagine how much petrol that would buy! Also the article used 2 different drivers with aggressive driving behaviors that obviously doesn't merit the cars that they are driving. They just seem to be bias towards the Prius in general. This article = :bsflag: [/qb][/QUOTE]Genius. You're missing the point. A car the size of a BMW with diesel power is more fuel efficient than the most efficient hybrid on the market, in this instance. And the article clearly states that they added 100 miles to the route through urban areas to give the hybrid a chance to use it's electric advantage. Your reasoning on the difference in cost is irrelevant. Do the same comparison, factoring in cost, with a Volkswagen Golf TDI and you get the same results as the article in a less expensive car. [/QB][/QUOTE]
(
how?
)
Instant Emojis
Instant UBB Code
What is UBB Code?
Options
Disable smilies in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Questions/Requests/Suggestions? email CAFords
Fueled by
Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com