This is topic moates quarterhorse in forum Tech Talk at Northern California Ford Owners .
To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=6;t=026612
Posted by jmcclesk (Member # 1355) on
:
any one on here use this system if so what do you think of it??
Posted by Camara90 (Member # 134) on
:
Jon I am sure you have seen this web site before, but they have some good info.
http://eectuning.org/forums/
Posted by jmcclesk (Member # 1355) on
:
yes thanks mike. what did you end up runung?? on and off the jug??
Posted by Camara90 (Member # 134) on
:
12.1 at 110mph with a high 1.7 60ft on motor, and three 11.2's at 118mph hot lapped in a row on the 100 shot. The last three runs went 1.7 60ft, 1.65, and that last was a high 1.5 60ft. Crazy thing was on all three runs were almost identical except 60ft got better each run, but time and MPH stayed exactly the same. Im guessing bottle pressure got a little low. Not bad for the first time out. 10's will be coming soon.
[ April 16, 2012, 02:27 AM: Message edited by: Camara90 ]
Posted by copcar (Member # 10113) on
:
The QH is cheap at roughly 300 but has no software. the softwares used are Binary Editor (BE) and EEC-Analyzer (EA) and are not cheap. Roughly another 250 at last check
I like BE/EA over Calcon/CalEdit (Tweecer) in that they are less "glitchy." They both do roughly the same thing. I currently run the newer version of Calcon/Caledit (Tweecer) and it is miles better than the older versions but still not as good as the BE/EA.
Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com