This is topic 1.7 rocker arm question.... in forum Tech Talk at Northern California Ford Owners .
To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=6;t=013047
Posted by Camaro Kid Z/28 (Member # 3100) on
:
since clevelands use the 1.72 rocker arm with trunions...has anyone tried using these on the 302's with any problems? i was thinking of putting these on for a low-buck upgrade?! your thoughts everyone? thanks for your time.
Ernesto
Posted by a50sn95 (Member # 527) on
:
Good Question. I honestly don't know the answer, but I've never heard of it being done. Since the "335" series is canted valve, I kind of doubt it. My guess is that they are too wide to fit next to each other in an inline configuration.
It's been a few years since I've seen 351C rockers, but they did seem very wide.
Anyway, if you have some, someone has to have a head off a car you can try them on....
Posted by Camaro Kid Z/28 (Member # 3100) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by a50sn95:
Good Question. I honestly don't know the answer, but I've never heard of it being done. Since the "335" series is canted valve, I kind of doubt it. My guess is that they are too wide to fit next to each other in an inline configuration.
It's been a few years since I've seen 351C rockers, but they did seem very wide.
Anyway, if you have some, someone has to have a head off a car you can try them on....
hmmm good point on the wideness of the rockers! i ll have to check into that! ![[Confused]](confused.gif)
thanks! ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
Posted by BlownNOSMustang (Member # 158) on
:
I have a 1993 302 Hatch. I have the Crane 1.7 rollers They work fine. I have had them for 10 years.
Posted by blind (Member # 3052) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by BlownNOSMustang:
I have a 1993 302 Hatch. I have the Crane 1.7 rollers They work fine. I have had them for 10 years.
10 years ago when you got them were they originally sold for cleveland engines?
Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com