This is topic Vote hell no on proposition 33 the auto insurance initiative! in forum General Talk at Northern California Ford Owners  .


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=056934

Posted by cobraracer46 (Member # 1142) on :
 
Proposition 33 is another mother fuckin deceptive insurance company trick created by the cock sucker who owns mercury insurance! Insurance companies spent millions to pass a similar law in 2010—voters defeated it. Proposition 33 allows auto insurers to raise premiums on responsible drivers up to $1,000, unfairly punishing people who stopped driving for legitimate reasons. Consumer advocates OPPOSE Prop. 33
Vote no for this bull shit! [Mad]
 
Posted by Cobra 93-4992 (Member # 4992) on :
 
Sounds like a discount for people who want to switch. Continuous coverage means legitimate people who have paid into insurance for 5 years, fuck the goofballs that lapse their coverage
 
Posted by Slowback67 (Member # 6348) on :
 
I voted yes on this one. I've been with the same provider for 10 + years. [patriot]
 
Posted by John91coupe (Member # 18) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Slowback67:
I voted yes on this one. I've been with the same provider for 10 + years. [patriot]

Voted yes also. Been with State Farm for 40 years.
 
Posted by Cobra 93-4992 (Member # 4992) on :
 
Unfairly charging people who quit driving for legitimate reasons, lol. Like what? I went to jail for 6 months? Or the person who drives around without insurance just to save a buck or two. The benefits seem to outweigh the possible person who falls into a coma and cant drive for a couple of months then wakes up miraculously and has the benefit of getting to drive again.

SUCK IT LIBERALS
 
Posted by Boss 327 (Member # 9143) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Cobra 93-4992:
Unfairly charging people who quit driving for legitimate reasons, lol. Like what? I went to jail for 6 months? Or the person who drives around without insurance just to save a buck or two. The benefits seem to outweigh the possible person who falls into a coma and cant drive for a couple of months then wakes up miraculously and has the benefit of getting to drive again.

SUCK IT LIBERALS

+1

I've been insured for 9 years now. Even if my cars sit for awhile or if I had to go places for long periods of time like when I was in the military, I still had insurance.

Fuckin low lifes who always want a free ride [Mad]
 
Posted by MACK.GT (Member # 10461) on :
 
Vote NO on prop 33, its just another device for the insurance companies to get more rich then they already are. If you had or didn't have continuous coverage for the past 5 years , is none of their business , so why should we the ppl vote for the insurance companies to have the right to add a surcharge to you . Maybe you split for awhile and sold your car, and lived abroad. Or maybe you are a new driver, I mean why should they the insurance companies be any less regulated when it comes to how much they are allowed to charge. I think I pay too much already ,personally. And I would love a discount on my rates too, but at the same time its none of their damm business what people have been upto the last five years, and they shouldn't be allowed to charge you and I more for insurance just because they want to make it their business.
 
Posted by Cobra 93-4992 (Member # 4992) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MACK.GT:
Vote NO on prop 33, its just another device for the insurance companies to get more rich then they already are. If you had or didn't have continuous coverage for the past 5 years , is none of their business , so why should we the ppl vote for the insurance companies to have the right to add a surcharge to you . Maybe you split for awhile and sold your car, and lived abroad. Or maybe you are a new driver, I mean why should they the insurance companies be any less regulated when it comes to how much they are allowed to charge. I think I pay too much already ,personally. And I would love a discount on my rates too, but at the same time its none of their damm business what people have been upto the last five years, and they shouldn't be allowed to charge you and I more for insurance just because they want to make it their business.

They already do charge you more if you havent had continuous coverage with your existing carrier now, where the fuck have you been. And if you try to shop around for new insurance you can't get the discount for continuous coverage, that's what this is for. Unless you know something i dont.
 
Posted by cobraracer46 (Member # 1142) on :
 
Fuck corporate greed and fuck the president of Mercury insurance for attempting to cheat California drivers out of their money by trying to pass this bull shit proposition.
Fuck the Auto insurance companies!
 
Posted by MACK.GT (Member # 10461) on :
 
SEE PROP 103,,where have I been haha funny that prop 103 was passed in 1988. and it doesn't allow insurance companies to charge me, or you all, more for insurance JUST because we have not had continuous coverage. 1988 prop 103 ....
 
Posted by asskickn88 (Member # 4957) on :
 
I agree, its totally bullshit when you get fucked out of your hard earned money!! Kinda like when the government wants to tax you to support fuckers who refuse to support themselves......
 
Posted by DLo (Member # 6133) on :
 
Who gives a shit about voting on state propositions. I've learned that voting doesn't mean anything. You can vote on something and then some judge will just come in and overturn it. What a waste of my fucking time. [Mad]
 
Posted by Ham'nEggs (Member # 8967) on :
 
I vote cobraracer46 for cocksucker [Whoo Whooooo!]
 
Posted by ECOboostin (Member # 4347) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ham'nEggs:
I vote cobraracer46 for cocksucker [Whoo Whooooo!]

Hahhaha
 
Posted by Wildfire532FB (Member # 1482) on :
 
I've been insured by the same State Farm since i started driving, i read it as a good thing so i voted yes on it. Sounds to me like it'll get people discounts if they switch to a new insurance if they want and new customers can get insurance.
 
Posted by Cobra 93-4992 (Member # 4992) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ECOboostin:
quote:
Originally posted by Ham'nEggs:
I vote cobraracer46 for cocksucker [Whoo Whooooo!]

Hahhaha
 -
 
Posted by Venomousnotch (Member # 8695) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ham'nEggs:
I vote cobraracer46 for cocksucker [Whoo Whooooo!]

Hahahahahaha LMFAO... [Whoo Whooooo!] [Whoo Whooooo!]
 
Posted by Infamous5.0 (Member # 1745) on :
 
I voted no!!! I've always had/paid insurance but not under my name. Once the dui I got almost 10 years goes away I will get it under my name ftw
 
Posted by cobraracer46 (Member # 1142) on :
 
Thank goodness that the voters of California said "Fuck You" to the owner of Mercury insurance by voting down this proposition that nothing more than another attempt by a greedy insurance company to ripp off the consumer!!
 
Posted by cobraracer46 (Member # 1142) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by cobraracer46:
Thank goodness that the voters of California said "Fuck You" to the owner of Mercury insurance by voting down this proposition that was nothing more than another attempt by a greedy insurance company to ripp off the consumer!!


 




Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com