This is topic H/C/I 1/4 Mile times in foxes. in forum General Talk at Northern California Ford Owners  .


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=047275
Posted by 5LiterSpeeder (Member # 8234) on :
 
I'm just wondering what kinda 1/4 mile times you guys are running in your H/C/I foxbody's? I went out last night and ran a 13.45.@105 and was kinda disappointed. I'm just wondering what to suspect. Thanks

And how could I get just a Luttle faster times out of it?
 
Posted by 50Reasons (Member # 6452) on :
 
I've seen mid12s to high 11s with mild head cam intake in a efi foxes

[ April 29, 2011, 06:28 AM: Message edited by: 50Reasons ]
 
Posted by M&M Performance *BlownMach1* (Member # 5400) on :
 
Never in my life seen a legit 11 second timeslip off h/c/I 302 setup.. Imma need a timeslip to prove that.. I ran 12.2 with seans coupe with only h/c/I but 331bottom end, imported 170cc heads and 24lb injectors only!
 
Posted by 50Reasons (Member # 6452) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by M&M Performance *BlownMach1*:
Never in my life seen a legit 11 second timeslip off h/c/I 302 setup.. Imma need a timeslip to prove that.. I ran 12.2 with seans coupe with only h/c/I but 331bottom end, imported 170cc heads and 24lb injectors only!
Here's one that went mid 10s
Check out this video on YouTube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9k2SCvFZuC8&feature=youtube_gdata_player


Daniel/50Reasons

[ April 29, 2011, 06:54 AM: Message edited by: 50Reasons ]
 
Posted by 50Reasons (Member # 6452) on :
 
And how could I get just a Luttle faster times out of it? [/QB][/QUOTE]

Try Lighting up the car makes a huge difference!
 
Posted by cali95gt (Member # 8940) on :
 
You should be almost a complete second faster than that bro. What type if tires were you on? Also what was your 60' ft?
 
Posted by Pure Stang (Member # 7251) on :
 
What was ur 60? Hci foxes run from where u are at to low 12's depending on suspension and tires! Honestly I have never seen a stock rotating assembly fox run 11's with just a hci unless it's gutted.'
 
Posted by Greasy (Member # 5258) on :
 
Fasterdamnit and the Green Machine went 11.90 @ 115 with a stock bottom end N/A 302 with H/C/I. I believe it was full weight LX hatch with all the accesories.

Then there is this
http://forums.corral.net/forums/drag-racing/335951-50-fastest-stock-bottom-end-n-mustang-list-part-ii.html

I'd turn the timing up, mess with the fuel pressure and work on the 60ft.
 
Posted by turbo50 (Member # 6700) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 5LiterSpeeder:
I'm just wondering what kinda 1/4 mile times you guys are running in your H/C/I foxbody's? I went out last night and ran a 13.45.@105 and was kinda disappointed. I'm just wondering what to suspect. Thanks

And how could I get just a Luttle faster times out of it?
Your MPH is low for HCI to begin with.

You can knock some ET off by using the typical age old hot rod tricks, good tires, better gears, chassis work the list goes on and on.

I ve seen and owned several 12 second HCI cars. I can post all the timeslips you want to see but none of them specify what was in the car when the timeslip was achieved.
 
Posted by 89bluenotch (Member # 7454) on :
 
Seat time?? Wasn't it you're first time back to the track in 4+ years??
 
Posted by 5LTR SVT (Member # 7080) on :
 
a "typical" hci setup should run mid to high 12's....sometimes even a low 12 depends
 
Posted by MikeD. (Member # 8060) on :
 
12.7's with a H/C/I 306. Full wieght GT, 3.73s, MT Et Streets.
 
Posted by SF Coupe (Member # 1810) on :
 
I took my car to the strip one time back when it was a street car. It did 12.8 at 109mph on street tires. Stock 302 rotating assembly and I admittedly suck at drag racing. I'd love to see what it would do now that it's 350lbs lighter, but I don't have any door glass!
 
Posted by Cstang50 (Member # 4925) on :
 
12.5 at 111 with a 302 H/C/I
 
Posted by 50DADDY (Member # 3076) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 50Reasons:
I've seen mid12s to high 11s with mild head cam intake in a efi foxes
+1,seen 10's out of HCI foxes.Not alot in the 10's but a few,and they had huge solid roller cams and high compression.And many low 12,high 11's,but those were well put together combos.And even more low 13's,high 12's.Depends alot on head choice/cam choice,and compression.I think low,low 13's are probably the average though.Your time doesnt sound too far off,you should probably be able to fine tune and drive into the 12's.

[ April 29, 2011, 01:54 PM: Message edited by: 50DADDY ]
 
Posted by warhorse58gt (Member # 7702) on :
 
i have been 12.5 @ 108 100% smog legal rr set up with 17" dr's(yes it had cats).. no weight transfer at all..
 
Posted by 84SVOrick (Member # 9039) on :
 
My boy is runnin a stock block jus intake, exhaust, pulleys, gears an a lil juice an hit 12.7 b4 juicein it he was pullin low 13s, its all in the driver in ur case, no offense btw
 
Posted by M&M Performance *BlownMach1* (Member # 5400) on :
 
All the times posted here are do-able but personally never seen it.. The 10 second fox just by looking at it run don't look like it's just h/c/I and stock bottom end to me.. Think someone is sand bagging about what's really done to the car.. Plus why wouldn't he be on the fastest list.. Pure Stang is a member of the corral.. Seen him post before plenty times.. Plus the member here is also asking about just bolting on a h/c/I setup.. Not making a stock bottom end gutted race car and taking the bottom end out to get rebuilt and flycut to show how cool he can be.. Honestly I dint get impressed, think they are stupid and should have built their gutted race car to run real times if it's only going to have 2800lbs..lol

Typically the best times u are going to see from just bolting on non-ported, non flycut, h/c/I setup is 12.5-13s...very rare are u even going to do that.. That will take some suspension, great driver, tires and some great tuning.. Most h/c/I cars out here run low 13s.. But 12s are possible but u gotta go the extra mile
 
Posted by SSF 50 (Member # 7219) on :
 
#1 thing is the driver!... my boy got a carb'd HCI & ran 13.1
 
Posted by a302juGRnuat (Member # 10163) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by M&M Performance *BlownMach1*:
All the times posted here are do-able but personally never seen it.. The 10 second fox just by looking at it run don't look like it's just h/c/I and stock bottom end to me.. Think someone is sand bagging about what's really done to the car.. Plus why wouldn't he be on the fastest list.. Pure Stang is a member of the corral.. Seen him post before plenty times.. Plus the member here is also asking about just bolting on a h/c/I setup.. Not making a stock bottom end gutted race car and taking the bottom end out to get rebuilt and flycut to show how cool he can be.. Honestly I dint get impressed, think they are stupid and should have built their gutted race car to run real times if it's only going to have 2800lbs..lol

Typically the best times u are going to see from just bolting on non-ported, non flycut, h/c/I setup is 12.5-13s...very rare are u even going to do that.. That will take some suspension, great driver, tires and some great tuning.. Most h/c/I cars out here run low 13s.. But 12s are possible but u gotta go the extra mile
sup kacey!...if i remember correctly, i think frick ran my car with a 13.1 @ 109? correct me if im wrong but im almost certain. and my car is literally a fat PIG!LOL.

my h/c/i setup isnt the best to get so wouldnt doubt pple can run 12's with a fox with a better setup right??
 
Posted by warhorse58gt (Member # 7702) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by M&M Performance *BlownMach1*:
All the times posted here are do-able but personally never seen it.. The 10 second fox just by looking at it run don't look like it's just h/c/I and stock bottom end to me.. Think someone is sand bagging about what's really done to the car.. Plus why wouldn't he be on the fastest list.. Pure Stang is a member of the corral.. Seen him post before plenty times.. Plus the member here is also asking about just bolting on a h/c/I setup.. Not making a stock bottom end gutted race car and taking the bottom end out to get rebuilt and flycut to show how cool he can be.. Honestly I dint get impressed, think they are stupid and should have built their gutted race car to run real times if it's only going to have 2800lbs..lol

ps. another member owns that same car and with 100% stock motor it still run 13.51 on shitty street tires..

Typically the best times u are going to see from just bolting on non-ported, non flycut, h/c/I setup is 12.5-13s...very rare are u even going to do that.. That will take some suspension, great driver, tires and some great tuning.. Most h/c/I cars out here run low 13s.. But 12s are possible but u gotta go the extra mile
it's easier than you think.. i went 12.6 @ 109 with a 100% stock p-n-p bottom end.. with box stock tw heads and perfromer 5.0 intake.. now it had full bolt ons. exhuast, pulleys, slicks, tb.. etc.. etc. running stiff road race suspension.. 100% full intior, radio and all..
if you want what you can do with a gutted race car.. a few years back.. in 5.0 mag they had a guy with a 306 running 9.8's shifting at 9600-98 rpms.. [Eek!] but #1 mod that is needed is a driver mod.. [patriot]

edit.. a member on the broad now owns it.. with a 100% stock motor the car has ran 13.51 with shitty street tires..

[ April 29, 2011, 03:44 PM: Message edited by: warhorse58gt ]
 
Posted by cali95gt (Member # 8940) on :
 
COPCAR here on this forum has ran 12.4 I think and his car doesn't have aluminums [Big Grin] High 11's is his fastest if I remember correctly.. check out his sig
 
Posted by 50Reasons (Member # 6452) on :
 
Hell I ran 13.2 on a stock long block with 1.7 rr and a b cam cobra intake 65 mm tb and stock maf with with shortys and a stock catted h pipe with 4:10s with all the weight so high 11s is not that hard with the right HCI and right suspension under it then I you take out a little weight your right there. My buddy had a 12 sec hatch removed almost a 1000 pounds and gutting and removing every thing and ran 9s with a 327 HCI you just got to use some old racer tricks [Wink]
 
Posted by 50DADDY (Member # 3076) on :
 
Since were talking about it,i ran 13.4's in a stock motored coupe with 4.10's,a short belt and slicks.Driver mod is always gonna be the most important.
 
Posted by Luke87GT (Member # 21) on :
 
There were at least 2 cars that I know of owned by members of this forum that had HCI and went 11.9x @ 113+

If I am not mistaken, both were TFS cars with the following in common:

- Lightweight coupes
- Both made north of 300rwhp
- Both used slicks
- Both had experienced owners who weren't afraid to launch the car and powershift across the track

As a general guideline of a car's capability, you can follow the rule of 10s:

103-104mph is enough for 12.99
113-114mph is enough for 11.99
123-124mph is enough for 10.99

But it's not easy. Driver needs to be on his game and of course, the launch has to be for real.

Damn Newbs lol

[ April 29, 2011, 06:52 PM: Message edited by: Luke87GT ]
 
Posted by StreakMatt (Member # 6257) on :
 
It comes down to how well the H/C/I is setup. Does the bottom end have good compression etc. Then u definitely need decent suspension mods, plus all bolt-ons.

My brothers 93 LX with H/C/I ran a 12.09@112 with a 1.6 60ft. I've been trying to get him to change out the E-Cam he has in there and throw on some longtubes. I guarantee he will go 11.90's with those additions.
 
Posted by 50Reasons (Member # 6452) on :
 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Just remove a few lbs and he's in the 11s but I agree with you Matt change to longtubes and cam

[ April 29, 2011, 07:03 PM: Message edited by: 50Reasons ]
 
Posted by v-town coupe (Member # 2771) on :
 
my old coupe the "v-town coupe" went 12.55 but it had a "z" cam, big heads,big injectors,good intake and tb,better ignition,3:73,longtubes,chassis work list goes on,etc.
 
Posted by warhorse58gt (Member # 7702) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 50Reasons:
Hell I ran 13.2 on a stock long block with 1.7 rr and a b cam cobra intake 65 mm tb and stock maf with with shortys and a stock catted h pipe with 4:10s with all the weight so high 11s is not that hard with the right HCI and right suspension under it then I you take out a little weight your right there. My buddy had a 12 sec hatch removed almost a 1000 pounds and gutting and removing every thing and ran 9s with a 327 HCI you just got to use some old racer tricks [Wink]
f.y.i... if you have a b cam it's not a stock long block.. but it is a stock short block.. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by 50Reasons (Member # 6452) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by warhorse58gt:
quote:
Originally posted by 50Reasons:
Hell I ran 13.2 on a stock long block with 1.7 rr and a b cam cobra intake 65 mm tb and stock maf with with shortys and a stock catted h pipe with 4:10s with all the weight so high 11s is not that hard with the right HCI and right suspension under it then I you take out a little weight your right there. My buddy had a 12 sec hatch removed almost a 1000 pounds and gutting and removing every thing and ran 9s with a 327 HCI you just got to use some old racer tricks [Wink]
f.y.i... if you have a b cam it's not a stock long block.. but it is a stock short block.. [Big Grin]
Ok you got me there but I also had a spun main barring
 
Posted by turbo50 (Member # 6700) on :
 
HCI cars are easily low 12 second cars the problem is that most people either up their game with some nitrous or boost or wrap the damn thing before they waste time with just HCI.........

Its not rocket science.

Cstang50s car is just re ring and bearing with b cam, performers and his car may be lighter but its not "gutted" and he is pushin 350 himself....
 
Posted by 93PONY (Member # 60) on :
 
Back in 03 the wife's 91GT was one of the heavier Foxes to run 11's on the stock shortblock. 3400lbs raceweight
The only weight removed was the spare tire, smog pump, and front sway bar.

Edelbrock 6037's (milled, exhaust ported, and quality valvetrain)
Edelbrock RPM intake, 70MM TB
Comp Cams 286HR (retarded)
Stock 120K mile shortblock w/Notched pistons
Ported shorty headers
Off-road H pipe
3.73's

1.70 60ft
11.99 @114.5mph

Fasterdamnit weighed in around 3300-3350lbs in his LX.
Stock shortblock
Fully ported TFS heads (something just north of 300cfm)
One of my custom cams
Longtubes / off-road exhaust
Fully ported Typhoon intake
Electric fan
3.73's

11.90 @115mph

There were a few other 11 second N/A stock shortblock foxes running at Sac Raceway at that time. Most of them just north of 300RWHP and 3000lbs.
 
Posted by 2TONE (Member # 4216) on :
 
my 4.10s h/c/i did 13.1 @108 on 18 saleens & street tires,full inter...
 
Posted by 707notchback jaejae (Member # 7958) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 50Reasons:
I've seen mid12s to high 11s with mild head cam intake in a efi foxes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqyJIvvGJhk
 
Posted by 5LiterSpeeder (Member # 8234) on :
 
Good info.

The 13.4 run I burned 2nd pretty hard but I powershifted all gears nicely. And that was with no pre run tire warming burnout.

I have TFS TW heads, TFS-R, and F-cam, 75mm TB ect. With 3.55 gears and no suspensionn other than H&R springs, MM Adjustable lower CA's and MM full length sub's.

The car runs hard but yes it was my first time out in 4 years in my full weight coupe + me at 270lbs with not bald but close to it BFG's GForce tires.

My 60ft times were consistent 2.2's when I got decent take off's. But like I said it's been a while and I was felling rusty. Also with RT's of .5XX I think that my drag driving can definitely improve.

I'm hoping to be back out there this coming Wednesday to practice again! If I do go I will post up my times again.
 
Posted by Cstang50 (Member # 4925) on :
 
you need to get your 60ft down...when i ran my 12.5 my 60 was 1.72

[ April 30, 2011, 10:39 PM: Message edited by: Cstang50 ]
 
Posted by 90lxfoxbody (Member # 6947) on :
 
My old 86.stock short block,trick flow heads system max intake compucam 2031 and supporting bolt ons with a ton of suspension 3100 with driver and a tremec trans went 11.89 at 116 1.58 60ft on motor and 10.6s at 125 on a 125 wet shot 1.41 60ft.this was at sac years ago.car made 340whp all motor.I think with a shorter tire on motor it would have gone a tenth or two quiker.kinda bogged on a 28 inch tall tire
 
Posted by M&M Performance *BlownMach1* (Member # 5400) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by a302juGRnuat:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by M&M Performance *BlownMach1*:

my h/c/i setup isnt the best to get so wouldnt doubt pple can run 12's with a fox with a better setup right??
Yes Scott did run that.. That's about average from the normal bolt on h/c/I.. Fox with a little less weight and 12s are there..

And Daniel... Lol u are talking about Bobby hall... Let's just say that car is a lot more than just bolt ons and has a LOT of money in it.. Also that car don't have a 327 no more! Me and him been friends since the 5th grade.. I worked on a few of his stangs, he had a Gt hatch back in the day that ran high12s with a completely stock motor.. Intake to pan! Lot less weight n lots of suspension!!!!!
 
Posted by 1320MASTER (Member # 773) on :
 
McCleskeys old car thats now mine was the first to run in the 11.90s with H/C/I stock shortblock notched pistons,TFS stage one cam,TFS TW heads and TFS intake only other mods was longtubes, 3.73 gears,MT streets and a airbag in the right rear.It ran 12.04 double clutching shift to third gear the next pass it ran 11.93.The coupe was 2950lbs with a 250lb driver.Here is a old video of the 12.04 run.
http://www.californiafords.com/album/VIDEOS/08_03_02/jon_vs_ls1.mpg
 
Posted by 5LTR SVT (Member # 7080) on :
 
60ft is key
 
Posted by a302juGRnuat (Member # 10163) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
60ft is key
true dat but thats y i like lookin at the trap speed...id rather have my stang run sub par 13s at 115 than mid 12's at 106
 
Posted by 5LTR SVT (Member # 7080) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by a302juGRnuat:
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
60ft is key
true dat but thats y i like lookin at the trap speed...id rather have my stang run sub par 13s at 115 than mid 12's at 106
whats the point of having that trap speed if u runnin 13's? just means u have more horsepower imo
 
Posted by Luke87GT (Member # 21) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by a302juGRnuat:
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
60ft is key
true dat but thats y i like lookin at the trap speed...id rather have my stang run sub par 13s at 115 than mid 12's at 106
Jebus

[ May 01, 2011, 06:27 PM: Message edited by: Luke87GT ]
 
Posted by 50DADDY (Member # 3076) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
quote:
Originally posted by a302juGRnuat:
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
60ft is key
true dat but thats y i like lookin at the trap speed...id rather have my stang run sub par 13s at 115 than mid 12's at 106
whats the point of having that trap speed if u runnin 13's? just means u have more horsepower imo
It also means your driving sucks or your tires suck or both.Ill take the 12's with the low trap speed.
 
Posted by 5LTR SVT (Member # 7080) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 50DADDY:
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
quote:
Originally posted by a302juGRnuat:
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
60ft is key
true dat but thats y i like lookin at the trap speed...id rather have my stang run sub par 13s at 115 than mid 12's at 106
whats the point of having that trap speed if u runnin 13's? just means u have more horsepower imo
It also means your driving sucks or your tires suck or both.Ill take the 12's with the low trap speed.
[dance]
 
Posted by sneakyfox90 (Member # 9379) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 50Reasons:
quote:
Originally posted by M&M Performance *BlownMach1*:
Never in my life seen a legit 11 second timeslip off h/c/I 302 setup.. Imma need a timeslip to prove that.. I ran 12.2 with seans coupe with only h/c/I but 331bottom end, imported 170cc heads and 24lb injectors only!
Here's one that went mid 10s
Check out this video on YouTube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9k2SCvFZuC8&feature=youtube_gdata_player


Daniel/50Reasons
i wana know what h/c/i this sob is runnin!
 
Posted by a302juGRnuat (Member # 10163) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
quote:
Originally posted by a302juGRnuat:
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
60ft is key
true dat but thats y i like lookin at the trap speed...id rather have my stang run sub par 13s at 115 than mid 12's at 106
whats the point of having that trap speed if u runnin 13's? just means u have more horsepower imo
yeah but it also means you have more potential...whatever your car is lacking in the 60ft, driver or whatever.

havent got mine to the track yet but when i do, i hope i get around a 110 trap speed. im not a very experience driver so im not really gonna expect much in the et...and i have no slicks either. but it would be nice to know with some practice, slicks or suspension that theres a 12 second run in her.
 
Posted by a302juGRnuat (Member # 10163) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 50DADDY:
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
quote:
Originally posted by a302juGRnuat:
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
60ft is key
true dat but thats y i like lookin at the trap speed...id rather have my stang run sub par 13s at 115 than mid 12's at 106
whats the point of having that trap speed if u runnin 13's? just means u have more horsepower imo
It also means your driving sucks or your tires suck or both.Ill take the 12's with the low trap speed.
just a matter of practice or tires but i ahvent got mine to the track yet either...i only said that cuz eventually, the 115 stang is really the faster car at the end of the day

[ May 02, 2011, 12:56 AM: Message edited by: a302juGRnuat ]
 
Posted by 5LTR SVT (Member # 7080) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by a302juGRnuat:
quote:
Originally posted by 50DADDY:
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
quote:
Originally posted by a302juGRnuat:
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
60ft is key
true dat but thats y i like lookin at the trap speed...id rather have my stang run sub par 13s at 115 than mid 12's at 106
whats the point of having that trap speed if u runnin 13's? just means u have more horsepower imo
It also means your driving sucks or your tires suck or both.Ill take the 12's with the low trap speed.
i only said that cuz eventually, the 115 stang is really the faster car at the end
umm not really, cuz by the time that low 13 car with a higher trap speed hits the 1/4 mi.....that 12 sec car with the low trap speed will be done already lol

im assuming u never been to the track??
 
Posted by a302juGRnuat (Member # 10163) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
quote:
Originally posted by a302juGRnuat:
quote:
Originally posted by 50DADDY:
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
quote:
Originally posted by a302juGRnuat:
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
60ft is key
true dat but thats y i like lookin at the trap speed...id rather have my stang run sub par 13s at 115 than mid 12's at 106
whats the point of having that trap speed if u runnin 13's? just means u have more horsepower imo
It also means your driving sucks or your tires suck or both.Ill take the 12's with the low trap speed.
i only said that cuz eventually, the 115 stang is really the faster car at the end
umm not really, cuz by the time that low 13 car with a higher trap speed hits the 1/4 mi.....that 12 sec car with the low trap speed will be done already lol

im assuming u never been to the track??
lol thats not what i meant...i meant "at the end of the day"

and yeah i dont have experience...ive only been to the track once
 
Posted by 5LTR SVT (Member # 7080) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by a302juGRnuat:
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
quote:
Originally posted by a302juGRnuat:
quote:
Originally posted by 50DADDY:
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
quote:
Originally posted by a302juGRnuat:
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
60ft is key
true dat but thats y i like lookin at the trap speed...id rather have my stang run sub par 13s at 115 than mid 12's at 106
whats the point of having that trap speed if u runnin 13's? just means u have more horsepower imo
It also means your driving sucks or your tires suck or both.Ill take the 12's with the low trap speed.
i only said that cuz eventually, the 115 stang is really the faster car at the end
umm not really, cuz by the time that low 13 car with a higher trap speed hits the 1/4 mi.....that 12 sec car with the low trap speed will be done already lol

im assuming u never been to the track??
lol thats not what i meant...i meant "at the end of the day"

and yeah i dont have experience...ive only been to the track once
i suck at the track too, its easy to go often when u live close but when u live 2+hours away its a diff story....im sure my car has a 12 in it too and its a heavy sn95 not a fox
 
Posted by a302juGRnuat (Member # 10163) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
quote:
Originally posted by a302juGRnuat:
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
quote:
Originally posted by a302juGRnuat:
quote:
Originally posted by 50DADDY:
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
quote:
Originally posted by a302juGRnuat:
quote:
Originally posted by 5LTR SVT:
60ft is key
true dat but thats y i like lookin at the trap speed...id rather have my stang run sub par 13s at 115 than mid 12's at 106
whats the point of having that trap speed if u runnin 13's? just means u have more horsepower imo
It also means your driving sucks or your tires suck or both.Ill take the 12's with the low trap speed.
i only said that cuz eventually, the 115 stang is really the faster car at the end
umm not really, cuz by the time that low 13 car with a higher trap speed hits the 1/4 mi.....that 12 sec car with the low trap speed will be done already lol

im assuming u never been to the track??
lol thats not what i meant...i meant "at the end of the day"

and yeah i dont have experience...ive only been to the track once
i suck at the track too, its easy to go often when u live close but when u live 2+hours away its a diff story....im sure my car has a 12 in it too and its a heavy sn95 not a fox
i havent gone with my new car cuz my cars not track ready yet. but im in worst shape than youlol. i got a sn95 vert!!! heavy as shit. what kinda h/c/i are you running.
 
Posted by 5LiterSpeeder (Member # 8234) on :
 
I agree with most, my 60 ft times need improving. With my street tires it may be difficult but I will definitely do better next time. The guy working at the track said my reaction time needs some help too, they were consistent .5xx's
 
Posted by 50DADDY (Member # 3076) on :
 
Dont trip man,practice makes perferct,slicks wont hurt either. [Wink]
 
Posted by Camara90 (Member # 134) on :
 
You will be adding me to the 11 second HCI car list real soon. Going to get the car tuned at AED as soon as I get some damn time!! Old setup was 12.5 with a 1.9 60ft with stock 64cc gt40x heads, gt40 intake, and tfs 1 cam.

[ May 04, 2011, 12:12 PM: Message edited by: Camara90 ]
 




Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com