Author
|
Topic: Longtubes and tuning
|
TwoTone91GT
¯
Member # 7254
|
posted
Who in here actually got a tune after installing longtubes ? Is it needed ? All these questions for a fox For those who didn't get a tune how did it run?
Posts: 469 | From: Elk Grove,Ca | Registered: Nov 2006
| :
|
|
89bluenotch
¯
Member # 7454
|
posted
don't waste your money
-------------------- -Gunnar 89 coupe 54 f100 R.I.P. SILVERLX
Posts: 1857 | From: HEALDSBURG | Registered: Feb 2007
| :
|
|
Jaejae5.0
¯
Member # 7958
|
posted
ive never heard of anyone gettin a tune after longtubes??..why would u need one?
Posts: 4890 | From: the combustion chamber | Registered: Oct 2007
| :
|
|
TwoTone91GT
¯
Member # 7254
|
posted
my friend had to for his car because it started to run rich
Posts: 469 | From: Elk Grove,Ca | Registered: Nov 2006
| :
|
|
CobramanPhil
¯
Member # 2170
|
posted
Well it depends really on a couple of things. Just the basic design of a longtube header compared to what you had on there before might necessitate a new tune in itself. Depends if your car was tuned to the ragged edge before with a smaller exhaust. You might go a bit leaner, but it won't matter if you did not have a tune in the first place as a reference start.
Most people run into idling issues with longtubes since the 02 sensors are now placed further down the exhaust path and get reduced heat from the exhaust (eec thinks it is still in warmup so it pushes more fuel and you get that rich condition). To cure that you can change the delay time to OL to enable the 02s to get heated after startup or you can force OL to run all the time (depends on your application, of course). Now I am not saying it is absolutely necessary to get a tune after longtubes, but to run with no negative issues then a tune is required.
Posts: 1016 | From: California, Bay Area | Registered: Dec 2002
| :
|
|
TwoTone91GT
¯
Member # 7254
|
posted
cobraphil thanks you made it plain and simple
Posts: 469 | From: Elk Grove,Ca | Registered: Nov 2006
| :
|
|