|
Author
|
Topic: mass air Flow vs. Speed Density
|
quickblue302
¯
Member # 7912
|
posted
 
 
which is better? how hard is it to do a converison? and what are the true benifits? more hp, how much dose it cost?
--------------------
Eat rice it's good for you!
Posts: 624 | From: sac | Registered: Sep 2007
| :
|
|
lxhatch5.0
¯
Member # 6319
|
posted
If your gonna Mod your engne, especially if u run a cam. U need to run the Mass Air for Drivability reasons. So Mass Air is a must with a H/C/I car.... ![[burnout]](graemlins/burnout.gif)
--------------------
*NorCal
Posts: 1556 | Registered: Dec 2005
| :
|
|
90lxfoxbody
¯
Member # 6947
|
posted
the conversion is a ecu and 4 wires.2 of witch dont even leave the engine compartment.
--------------------
Owner Of All Out Performance
Ya I own that Cobra
Old setup whipple and jug 9.37 155
New twins hoping for 8.50s at 165
Posts: 588 | From: fresno ca | Registered: Jul 2006
| :
|
|
uh0h50
CAFords OG
Member # 3125
|
posted
stock for stock, speed density has the upper hand in terms of power. now when you start throwing mods at the car, depending on the kind of cams especially, you're most likely going to want to switch over to mass-air. don't get me wrong, there are plenty of mustang enthusiasts who swear by the potential of speed density and are making just as much power as mass air vehicles... good luck.
--------------------
AP1 S2000
Posts: 2926 | From: Bay Area 510 | Registered: Jul 2003
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
