Northern California Ford racer's Message Board Forum Sell & Buy Ford Parts in Northern California Classifieds Mustang Pictures / Videos of Ford Cars in Northern California

Northern California Ford Owners  


Post New Topic  Post a Ford message board Reply
read DMs/my profile login | join CAFords | search | faq |
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Northern California Ford Owners     » Automotive   » Tech Talk   » cam question

 - Email this post to someone!    
Author Topic: cam question
89Saleen310
¯
Member # 5397

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for 89Saleen310  Ford pictures for 89Saleen310  Author's Homepage     Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
Hey im putting together an 5.0 engine im gunna have gt 40 x heads stock short block intake exaust and 24lb injectors what is the best cam i can use to get the most hp and torque i can get and clear my pistons. Smog does not matter.

--------------------
89 Saleen #310
64 1/2 coupe
73 mach 1
73 vert
66 vert
65 vert
67 coupe
67 coupe
66 coupe

Posts: 1128 | From: Oakland Hills (montclair) | Registered: Feb 2005  |  :
vpr_klr
¯
Member # 3353

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for vpr_klr  Ford pictures for vpr_klr    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
Comp 266 hr or 266 xe

a crane 2031.

Remember, bigger is not better when it comes to cams.

I would recommend that you take your heads to a machine shop and have a valve job done and new guides put in it. Out of the box heads are NEVER right from the manufacturer, even AFR's.

--------------------
Project crustang has begun
14 mustangs and counting...

Posts: 893 | From: Livermore | Registered: Oct 2003  |  :
LQ9SN95
¯
Member # 7080

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for LQ9SN95  Ford pictures for LQ9SN95    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
quote:
Originally posted by vpr_klr:


Remember, bigger is not better when it comes to cams.

not neccasarly...for example, take a ls1 and put in a ms4 cam.....pulls like a mother fucker!!!!! like damn!!!

and the ms4 is a big ass cam!!!! ya its for a ls1, but still a very big cam......

--------------------
http://www.fastgms-teamfast.com
http://www.facebook.com/aop.fresno?ref=ts&fref=ts
Lq9 swap
102 fast intake
Trick flow heads
T rex cam

Posts: 8031 | From: Fresno, Ca | Registered: Sep 2006  |  :
vpr_klr
¯
Member # 3353

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for vpr_klr  Ford pictures for vpr_klr    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
Again, if you like just slapping parts together, be my guest. Off the shelf cams with huge numbers are great for people who don't really know what they are doing.

Yes it will pull, but so does a gt-40 headed motor with an e-cam. That doesn't dictate overall power output and drivability. Spend some time in an engine dyno room, you might LEARN something.

--------------------
Project crustang has begun
14 mustangs and counting...

Posts: 893 | From: Livermore | Registered: Oct 2003  |  :
LQ9SN95
¯
Member # 7080

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for LQ9SN95  Ford pictures for LQ9SN95    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
well im sorry if im not a dyno tech and work on cars and shit...i just know things here and there.....oh and plus.....just cuz a car has hella power doesnt mean that u will be faster......

[ February 26, 2007, 11:45 PM: Message edited by: F8LSN8K ]

--------------------
http://www.fastgms-teamfast.com
http://www.facebook.com/aop.fresno?ref=ts&fref=ts
Lq9 swap
102 fast intake
Trick flow heads
T rex cam

Posts: 8031 | From: Fresno, Ca | Registered: Sep 2006  |  :
JohnB
Tech Moderator
Member # 969

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for JohnB  Ford pictures for JohnB    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
So you're looking at maybe 9.2-1cr...it doesn't need a huge cam. Anything crazy, you'll lose a load-o-torque. My vote is for a 266xe or the Powermax 2031. If you want great drivability, go with the latter...

--------------------
1965 Shelby Cobra
1993 Cobra
2012 F150 Raptor
2020 GT500

Posts: 6523 | From: Orlando FL/Redding CA | Registered: Mar 2002  |  :
89Saleen310
¯
Member # 5397

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for 89Saleen310  Ford pictures for 89Saleen310  Author's Homepage     Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
how will it run if i put an f cam with 1.6 roller rockers.

--------------------
89 Saleen #310
64 1/2 coupe
73 mach 1
73 vert
66 vert
65 vert
67 coupe
67 coupe
66 coupe

Posts: 1128 | From: Oakland Hills (montclair) | Registered: Feb 2005  |  :
HaulinAss Motorsports
Its a STREETRaceCar!
Member # 541

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for HaulinAss Motorsports  Ford pictures for HaulinAss Motorsports    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
quote:
Originally posted by 73beast351c:
how will it run if i put an f cam with 1.6 roller rockers.

The cam is designed for a 1.6 rocker which is the stock ratio.you can pull a lil more out of it with a 1.7 rocker.I have had ALOT of good luck with the F-Cam,old technolgy some may say but power is power [Wink]
Posts: 22472 | From: Sacramento | Registered: Nov 2001  |  :
uh0h50
CAFords OG
Member # 3125

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for uh0h50  Ford pictures for uh0h50    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
is anyone running this set up and can you tell me how much hp your gettin from it. Please Thanks

--------------------
AP1 S2000

Posts: 2926 | From: Bay Area 510 | Registered: Jul 2003  |  :
JohnB
Tech Moderator
Member # 969

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for JohnB  Ford pictures for JohnB    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
You may want to decide on a cam, we can all give you better estimates from that.

--------------------
1965 Shelby Cobra
1993 Cobra
2012 F150 Raptor
2020 GT500

Posts: 6523 | From: Orlando FL/Redding CA | Registered: Mar 2002  |  :
uh0h50
CAFords OG
Member # 3125

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for uh0h50  Ford pictures for uh0h50    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
f cam please

--------------------
AP1 S2000

Posts: 2926 | From: Bay Area 510 | Registered: Jul 2003  |  :
asskickn88
¯
Member # 4957

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for asskickn88  Ford pictures for asskickn88    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
quote:
Originally posted by 73beast351c:
how will it run if i put an f cam with 1.6 roller rockers.

I have a set of 1.7's and am looking to trade for some 1.6's if your interested. They are pedistal mount and only have around 1K miles on em.

--------------------
Three 540 Bimmers and a 5.0 Explorer.... got a Ford back in the stable!

It's time for the country to do what Obama's own father did.
Abandon him.

Posts: 6069 | From: Rocklin, Ca | Registered: Oct 2004  |  :
93PONY
Mr. Valve Events
Member # 60

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for 93PONY  Ford pictures for 93PONY        Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
If smog is not a problem, notch the pistons & get a camshaft with more overlap. Overlap = power...no matter how you slice it.

XE cams will make the most TQ/HP given the size of the cam, so look at those for OTS grinds....they'll always be your best bet. But be aware that they are inverted flank lobes & require stiff valvesprings to control the valvetrain. Plan on a valvespring/retainer upgrade when going with an XE camshaft.

We've had good luck with these OTS grinds:
XE264HR (great idle, smogable, clears pistons)
XE270HR
XE266HR
XE258HR
XE274HR (may or may not clear stock pistons....depends on the heads)
Comp 280HR (224/224 110LSA, .560/.560 w1.6's) more power than any 'alfabet' cam, but will require valvespring upgrade.
Comp 286HR (requires piston notching & valvespring upgrade. 230/230 110LSA, .598/.598 w/1.6's) This cam makes a TON of power when in the right setup. Went 11.99 @114mph with a stock shortblock, Edelbrock Perfromers, RPM intake & shorty headers.
X303 w1.6's.....can't really beat it for the price, clears the pistons when degreed in at 'straight up', idles good, & will pass smog....also easy on valvesprings compared to the others above.
B303 w1.7's (basically the same as an X with 1.6's)
Z303 Similar in overlap to the XE274HR, but less aggressive.
Crane 2030/2031's work great for smogable setups, but a little small IMO if you're looking for 'max effort' out of the camshaft. Same with the X, Z, B & XE's smaller than the 274HR.

About the almighty LS1's.... Slap any camshaft in an LS1 & you'll get a crap-load of power. The problem is a lot of the 'big' cams are WAY too big for the setup & don't make shit for low/midrange TQ. Some of my smallest LS1 grinds are the fastest. 220/220 112LSA made 395RWHP with stock heads....224/222 113LSA made 396RWHP with stock heads.....229/226 112LSA made 405RWHP with stock heads......etc, etc. The kicker is that the TQ curve was stupid flat like a stock LS1 cam (lots of low end). If you want a powercurve like a 2stroke hitting it's powerband but has nothing down low, get a big F'in camshaft.....but you can get nearly as much top end with a LOT more bottom end from the correct sized bumpstick. (given the application).

[ February 28, 2007, 07:39 PM: Message edited by: 93PONY ]

--------------------
www.advancedenginedevelopment.com
SCT dealer
Dynotuning

(916)715-7569

Posts: 4265 | From: Fair Oaks, CA | Registered: Nov 2000  |  :
2stangs69-91
¯
Member # 1951

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for 2stangs69-91  Ford pictures for 2stangs69-91    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
with my stock 5.0 short block GT40X heads a E cam and 1.7's I had to notch the pistons. The intake valves were enough bigger than stock with the extra lift and duration it was to close to hitting to chance it.

--------------------
69 Mustang on hold
1991 LX hatch getting a make over
1994 F150 4X4 351
2006 Yamaha V-max 1200 Modded

Posts: 3711 | From: Redding | Registered: Oct 2002  |  :
93PONY
Mr. Valve Events
Member # 60

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for 93PONY  Ford pictures for 93PONY        Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
quote:
Originally posted by 2stangs69-91:
with my stock 5.0 short block GT40X heads a E cam and 1.7's I had to notch the pistons. The intake valves were enough bigger than stock with the extra lift and duration it was to close to hitting to chance it.

That's a good point.
Every setup is different, what clears on one setup may not clear on another. It's always a good idea to check piston to valve clearance.

--------------------
www.advancedenginedevelopment.com
SCT dealer
Dynotuning

(916)715-7569

Posts: 4265 | From: Fair Oaks, CA | Registered: Nov 2000  |  :
COPFITY
¯
Member # 1845

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for COPFITY  Ford pictures for COPFITY    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
quote:
Originally posted by 93PONY:
If smog is not a problem, notch the pistons & get a camshaft with more overlap. Overlap = power...no matter how you slice it.

XE cams will make the most TQ/HP given the size of the cam, so look at those for OTS grinds....they'll always be your best bet. But be aware that they are inverted flank lobes & require stiff valvesprings to control the valvetrain. Plan on a valvespring/retainer upgrade when going with an XE camshaft.

We've had good luck with these OTS grinds:
XE264HR (great idle, smogable, clears pistons)
XE270HR
XE266HR
XE258HR
XE274HR (may or may not clear stock pistons....depends on the heads)
Comp 280HR (224/224 110LSA, .560/.560 w1.6's) more power than any 'alfabet' cam, but will require valvespring upgrade.
Comp 286HR (requires piston notching & valvespring upgrade. 230/230 110LSA, .598/.598 w/1.6's) This cam makes a TON of power when in the right setup. Went 11.99 @114mph with a stock shortblock, Edelbrock Perfromers, RPM intake & shorty headers.
X303 w1.6's.....can't really beat it for the price, clears the pistons when degreed in at 'straight up', idles good, & will pass smog....also easy on valvesprings compared to the others above.
B303 w1.7's (basically the same as an X with 1.6's)
Z303 Similar in overlap to the XE274HR, but less aggressive.
Crane 2030/2031's work great for smogable setups, but a little small IMO if you're looking for 'max effort' out of the camshaft. Same with the X, Z, B & XE's smaller than the 274HR.

About the almighty LS1's.... Slap any camshaft in an LS1 & you'll get a crap-load of power. The problem is a lot of the 'big' cams are WAY too big for the setup & don't make shit for low/midrange TQ. Some of my smallest LS1 grinds are the fastest. 220/220 112LSA made 395RWHP with stock heads....224/222 113LSA made 396RWHP with stock heads.....229/226 112LSA made 405RWHP with stock heads......etc, etc. The kicker is that the TQ curve was stupid flat like a stock LS1 cam (lots of low end). If you want a powercurve like a 2stroke hitting it's powerband but has nothing down low, get a big F'in camshaft.....but you can get nearly as much top end with a LOT more bottom end from the correct sized bumpstick. (given the application).

thanx! tons of information

--------------------
'92 Mustang LX Coupe
-Procharger P600
'71 Camaro Project
'97 Saturn SL1(saving the planet)

Posts: 884 | From: Pittsburg CA... No "H" cuz we don't hate! | Registered: Sep 2002  |  :


 
Post New Topic  Post a Ford message board Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
Hop To:

Questions/Requests/Suggestions? email CAFords



Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com