|
Author
|
Topic: Delete
|
89TRUNK
¯
Member # 2506
|
posted
 
 
Delete
[ 2013-11-23, 09:03 PM: Message edited by: 89TRUNK ]
Posts: 1843 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Feb 2003
| :
|
|
fiftwyz
¯
Member # 8351
|
posted
Nice
Posts: 679 | From: sunnyvale | Registered: Apr 2008
| :
|
|
|
|
89TRUNK
¯
Member # 2506
|
posted
I can't access the photos on that site. You can fwd them to my cell or email aguilar_w@yahoo.com
Posts: 1843 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Feb 2003
| :
|
|
|
|
89TRUNK
¯
Member # 2506
|
posted
Looks pretty good. Damage to the roof and right rear fender well. Clear title? 5 spd? Efi?
Posts: 1843 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Feb 2003
| :
|
|
89TRUNK
¯
Member # 2506
|
posted
Just looked at more pics. Efi, manual trans. I'm interested, does it pass smog? You can text me instead of going back and forth on here
Posts: 1843 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Feb 2003
| :
|
|
Brokn Nx
¯
Member # 8526
|
posted
Original 5.0 CFI car, I bought it as a roller. The car has a full EFI swap to SEFI. The harness was out of an 86, to keep all the gauges and underdash equipment correct for a four eyed car. The motor is a roller shortblock with rebuilt E7's, its not the motor from the 86 wiring donor car. The trans is a T5 from an 88, the trans wants to pop out of second occasionally when downshifting.
The dings/dents on the roof look to have been from something heavy sitting on top of the car, like a box or something. As for the rear quarter, it from the original owner hitting the garge door hardware when backing out of the garage. Its not into the quarter, just the lip. The car was issued a CA salvage title after a super low scrape of the front bumper cover in the early 2000's, at that time these cars were really cheap and almost never got fixed by insurance companies for any claim damage. As you can see from the pics, the whole front underbody isn't damaged. the radiator support is in really good shape. Heck, nobody has even used it as a jacking point!
Its my reliable driver, and gets low 20's on the open road.
--------------------
85-0001 Saleen Mustang
88-362 Saleen Notch
85-090 Saleen Hatch
67 Stang Coupe
Posts: 333 | From: Santa Maria, CA | Registered: Jul 2008
| :
|
|
Brokn Nx
¯
Member # 8526
|
posted
Passed smog about six months ago. We have the non-dyno style test, so I can't say for sure if it would pass in the 'enhanced' regions. I don't think it would be a problem though, as it has stock headers and a stock midpipe. Its really just a stock notch mechanically.
--------------------
85-0001 Saleen Mustang
88-362 Saleen Notch
85-090 Saleen Hatch
67 Stang Coupe
Posts: 333 | From: Santa Maria, CA | Registered: Jul 2008
| :
|
|
89TRUNK
¯
Member # 2506
|
posted
Car looks good but I can't get past the salvaged title.
Posts: 1843 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Feb 2003
| :
|
|
Brokn Nx
¯
Member # 8526
|
posted
No problem.
--------------------
85-0001 Saleen Mustang
88-362 Saleen Notch
85-090 Saleen Hatch
67 Stang Coupe
Posts: 333 | From: Santa Maria, CA | Registered: Jul 2008
| :
|
|
89TRUNK
¯
Member # 2506
|
posted
Bump
Posts: 1843 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Feb 2003
| :
|
|
89TRUNK
¯
Member # 2506
|
posted
Bump
Posts: 1843 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Feb 2003
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
