|
Author
|
Topic: Back To The Dyno And Got 474RWHP
|
racsirx
CAFords OG
Member # 1710
|
posted
 
 
Well,I went back to the dyno today with the SSP Coupe, I had some mass air meter problems that I figured out, so had to retune it. I went from 458 RWHP & 463 RWTQ to 474.57 RWHP & 473.98 RWTQ. I am very happy with the numbers since I built the whole car from spare parts.
--------------------
88 Saleen #564
88 GT 331 NOVI2000
88 Coupe TURBO 9.75@142
95 Cobra R #75-SOLD
06 F250
13 BMW AH3
17 GT350 #5556
GOD'S NOT DEAD
Posts: 20750 | From: Concord & Pittsburg, CA | Registered: Aug 2002
| :
|
|
illwill510
¯
Member # 3788
|
posted
Thats a good jump up in power to the ground. What was the problem with the mass air?
Posts: 785 | From: Sacramento | Registered: Nov 2003
| :
|
|
asskickn88
¯
Member # 4957
|
posted
What Performer heads are you running? I'm getting my new motor together right now and cant wait to get it tuned.
--------------------
Three 540 Bimmers and a 5.0 Explorer.... got a Ford back in the stable!
It's time for the country to do what Obama's own father did.
Abandon him.
Posts: 6069 | From: Rocklin, Ca | Registered: Oct 2004
| :
|
|
COPFITY
¯
Member # 1845
|
posted
good shit L dog.. and yea what were the MAF problems?
--------------------
'92 Mustang LX Coupe
-Procharger P600
'71 Camaro Project
'97 Saturn SL1(saving the planet)
Posts: 884 | From: Pittsburg CA... No "H" cuz we don't hate! | Registered: Sep 2002
| :
|
|
92stangLX
¯
Member # 3252
|
posted
Damn, those are some pretty good numbers. What is your setup on that car?
Posts: 5302 | From: San Francisco | Registered: Sep 2003
| :
|
|
STREETFIGHTER50
¯
Member # 2973
|
posted
Good shit Lee! U need to take her to the track now ![[burnout]](graemlins/burnout.gif) Let's see some 10's ![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
--------------------
'89 Coupe-Kurgan Tuned 498/491RW, Vortech SI, 351W
Posts: 3925 | From: SF Bay Coastin' to Rocklin | Registered: Jun 2003
| :
|
|
Luke87GT
Lay'n more stripes
than Caltrans
Member # 21
|
posted
Lee, was this with 110 octane?
If so, how much power would you be sacrificing with a tune that would allow you to run 91 octane all the time?
[ January 12, 2007, 11:13 PM: Message edited by: Luke87GT ]
--------------------
Stangless
Posts: 7802 | From: San Mateo | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
JohnB
Tech Moderator
Member # 969
|
posted
The MAF problems obviously weren't too severe, it didn't pick up alot. Nice numbers though. What cam?
--------------------
1965 Shelby Cobra
1993 Cobra
2012 F150 Raptor
2020 GT500
Posts: 6523 | From: Orlando FL/Redding CA | Registered: Mar 2002
| :
|
|
racsirx
CAFords OG
Member # 1710
|
posted
I really dont know what cam is in the motor, I got the longblock from Phat50, but it sounds like an E303 cam.
I really dont know what numbers it would make on 91 octance, but with 14lbs boost and 24 degrees of total timing I think 110 octane is the key, otherwise I would have to retard more timing out of it, but I do have a 91 octane tune for my Coupe but didnt get that measured.
I am running the small valve Edelbrock Performer heads.
My setup is Edelbrock Performer heads, GT-40 intake, 306, cam, S-trim, Bassani full exhaust.
The mass air was installed backwards, I got the mass air meter with the air filter already installed, so I didnt notice it and installed it like that. I ran great on full throttle but driving in traffic you knew there was a problem.
--------------------
88 Saleen #564
88 GT 331 NOVI2000
88 Coupe TURBO 9.75@142
95 Cobra R #75-SOLD
06 F250
13 BMW AH3
17 GT350 #5556
GOD'S NOT DEAD
Posts: 20750 | From: Concord & Pittsburg, CA | Registered: Aug 2002
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
