|
Author
|
Topic: wats the diff between 2.5 n 3" x pipe??
|
85staNg302
¯
Member # 9450
|
posted
 
 
![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif) wuts it says. lmk thanks
Posts: 1561 | From: sacramento | Registered: Sep 2009
| :
|
|
CobraChick
¯
Member # 9885
|
posted
half an inch
--------------------
Behind ever successful person is a pack of haters.
Posts: 675 | Registered: Mar 2010
| :
|
|
SydeWaySix
CAFords OG
Member # 3596
|
posted
hahaah, forreal? Are you really asking this ![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
--------------------
2013 Boss 302 #356. Performance White. Stock.
1965 Fastback GT Restored to stock spec.
Posts: 9882 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Dec 2002
| :
|
|
|
|
Blind
2.3L
CAFords OG
Member # 3052
|
posted
well, the 3" will make a stockish 5.0 lose power
--------------------
89 LX Notchback ex 4cyl, 14psi
02 Harley F150, 15psi
Posts: 8521 | From: Fairfield | Registered: Jul 2003
| :
|
|
phildog
¯
Member # 1214
|
posted
On a stroker-equipped car making 400+hp, with long tubes and a 3" cat-back, yes, a 3" X-pipe is perfect. If you are plumbing into a 2.5" or stock cat-back, then there is no point. There is only one bolt in 3" X-pipe kit designed for 5.0's with shorties, the Flowmaster version.
Posts: 1554 | From: 510 | Registered: Apr 2002
| :
|
|
92stangLX
¯
Member # 3252
|
posted
3" is not necessary in most applications
Posts: 5302 | From: San Francisco | Registered: Sep 2003
| :
|
|
92_5.0
¯
Member # 7624
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 92stangLX:
3" is not necessary in most applications
Yup, you can go a long way with a 2.5" set up
--------------------
Infineon/Sears point? same difference!
11.8 @ 115 mph @ Sac Raceway
411 rwhp 402 trq (old set up)
540 rwhp 517 rwtrq (new set up)
ET's to come
Posts: 1629 | From: bay area | Registered: May 2007
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
