|
Author
|
Topic: MAC PRO CHAMBER OR H OR X PIPE
|
96cobra/svt
¯
Member # 4240
|
posted
 
 
WISH ONE WILL SOUND BETTER IN A 96 COBRA SUPERCHARGE WITH FLOWS
Posts: 200 | From: NAPA | Registered: Mar 2004
| :
|
|
bobbystang
¯
Member # 2747
|
posted
i had a bbk x pipe on my 99 cobra with flows, the x pipe sounded like sh*t, all raspy terrible sound, put the mac prochamber on and it got rid of all the raspiness but it took away alot of the loudness but its not as bad as i say, i luv the mac prochamber and gave me alot more noticeable low end torque. jsut my 2 cents
--------------------
99 cobra 3569-4040
mods: bunch of little things.
Posts: 83 | From: detroit, michigan | Registered: Apr 2003
| :
|
|
BlackNGold
CaliforniaFords.com
Moderator
Member # 655
|
posted
It's up to you what sounds better!...
I vote Bassani X pipe...MAC has some quality issues with their products...
--------------------
-SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT-
Posts: 5132 | From: Bay Area, CA | Registered: Dec 2001
| :
|
|
Sicc98GT
¯
Member # 1862
|
posted
with the flows i would go with an off road h ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
[ May 13, 2004, 06:34 PM: Message edited by: Sicc98GT ]
--------------------
Black 98 GT - sold
05 trd off road tacoma
Posts: 485 | From: San Ramon | Registered: Sep 2002
| :
|
|
9cobra9
¯
Member # 4470
|
posted
on my 99 cobra i have an h-pipe with flows, sonds great.
--------------------
Red 1999 Cobra #1227
cai, bbk headers, offroad h-pipe, short shifter, 3.73's, magnaflow mufflers, LTW flywheel and 04 cobra clutch,
co-owner of PWA
Posts: 1145 | From: Fremont | Registered: May 2004
| :
|
|
9cobra9
¯
Member # 4470
|
posted
on my 99 cobra i have an h-pipe with flows, sonds great.
--------------------
Red 1999 Cobra #1227
cai, bbk headers, offroad h-pipe, short shifter, 3.73's, magnaflow mufflers, LTW flywheel and 04 cobra clutch,
co-owner of PWA
Posts: 1145 | From: Fremont | Registered: May 2004
| :
|
|
TRIXSNK
¯
Member # 2844
|
posted
Is there a big sound / performance difference between a prochamber and an off-road H?
I loved my prochamber and flows but was just wondering how the off-road H would sound and perform.
--------------------
9 Sec EVO 9 is GONE!
New project in the works.......
Posts: 3740 | From: Bay Area | Registered: May 2003
| :
|
|
Quick 88LX
¯
Member # 1950
|
posted
The H is the least performing out of the three. Pro-chamber all the way. I have tested all three on my own vehicle and the PC is what I have stuck with.
--------------------
"Men are Made, Not Born"
Car Picture : http://www.angelfire.com/theforce/quick88lx/
Original Member #495. Can I get my number back?
Posts: 1785 | From: Fairfield, CA/Okinawa, Japan | Registered: Oct 2002
| :
|
|
BlackNGold
CaliforniaFords.com
Moderator
Member # 655
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Quick 88LX:
The H is the least performing out of the three. Pro-chamber all the way. I have tested all three on my own vehicle and the PC is what I have stuck with.
Are you talking sound or horsepower when you say "least performing"?...
--------------------
-SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT-
Posts: 5132 | From: Bay Area, CA | Registered: Dec 2001
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
