Northern California Ford racer's Message Board Forum Sell & Buy Ford Parts in Northern California Classifieds Mustang Pictures / Videos of Ford Cars in Northern California

Northern California Ford Owners  


Post New Topic  Post a Ford message board Reply
read DMs/my profile login | join CAFords | search | faq |
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Northern California Ford Owners     » Automotive   » Tech Talk   » 1/4 mile times at sac on 3/20 (first time at sac)

 - Email this post to someone!    
Author Topic: 1/4 mile times at sac on 3/20 (first time at sac)
4.6GT
¯
Member # 2643

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for 4.6GT  Ford pictures for 4.6GT    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
wht do you guys think about this time as my best is
60ft: 2.103
E.T : 13.79 at 101.197

on nitto street tires 275/40/17 are those times sorry or is that what my car should be running
its a 02GT wih 3:73's,BBk cold air,75mm TB,C&l intake plenum,ASP pullies ,MAC PRO CHAMBER, and 2 chamber flows

i think i can get better times what should the car be runing with those bolt ons

--------------------
CAR 2002 mustang GT 5spd
254rwhp/305 ft lb torque N/A

Best E.T
1.93 60ft 13.1 @105

Posts: 320 | From: Nor Cal | Registered: Mar 2003  |  :
BlackNGold
CaliforniaFords.com
Moderator
Member # 655

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for BlackNGold  Ford pictures for BlackNGold    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
I think the 75mm is personally too big...

You need to work on your driving and get your 60ft's down...You should be able to get 2.0's with 275 street tires....If you atleast get your 60ft down a tenth you'd be in the 13.6s...

Do you power shift by Just keeping it floored the whole time?..

--------------------
-SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT-

Posts: 5132 | From: Bay Area, CA | Registered: Dec 2001  |  :
mtbaughs
Road Racer
Member # 4052

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for mtbaughs  Ford pictures for mtbaughs    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
ya 75mm is WAY to big.

--------------------
R.I.P. Charlie Bruno Dec 2001

Posts: 2019 | From: Boise, Idaho | Registered: Jan 2004  |  :
4.6GT
¯
Member # 2643

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for 4.6GT  Ford pictures for 4.6GT    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
no i dont power shift

--------------------
CAR 2002 mustang GT 5spd
254rwhp/305 ft lb torque N/A

Best E.T
1.93 60ft 13.1 @105

Posts: 320 | From: Nor Cal | Registered: Mar 2003  |  :
GradGT
¯
Member # 3910

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for GradGT  Ford pictures for GradGT    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
That's not that bad of a time. 60 ft. could use some work though. Maybe you should look into some drag radials or something. That would help
Posts: 189 | From: Antioch | Registered: Dec 2003  |  :
bunchmyfunky
CAFords Drag Racing Mod
Member # 360

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for bunchmyfunky  Ford pictures for bunchmyfunky    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
The 75mm TB is fine. Its not hurting anything and works good with the c&l plenum. Your car can run 13.5s or better with some DRs and good driving.
Posts: 2433 | From: Vacaville | Registered: Jul 2001  |  :
DropTopFox
drama
Member # 1689

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for DropTopFox  Ford pictures for DropTopFox    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
quote:
Originally posted by bunchmyfunky:
The 75mm TB is fine. Its not hurting anything and works good with the c&l plenum. Your car can run 13.5s or better with some DRs and good driving.

Is the 75 hurting his low end torque [Confused]

--------------------
Go out and do something for yourself today everyone, quit depending on others

-Me
http://www.CaliforniaFords.com/cgi-bin/album.pl?album=00001689

Posts: 4003 | From: San Bruno | Registered: Aug 2002  |  :
blackmagic02GT
¯
Member # 1786

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for blackmagic02GT  Ford pictures for blackmagic02GT    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
those are decent times at sac with those mods. the 75 should be fine with the gears he has. if it was an auto with 3.27's it might hurt.

--------------------
2002 GT Stone stock 14.02 @ 99mph
steeda u/d pullies, k/n filter, 4.10's 13.70 @ 102mph
in garage: steeda t/a, NX wet kit and cobra R rims

Posts: 69 | From: Roseville | Registered: Sep 2002  |  :
03GT281
¯
Member # 2944

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for 03GT281  Ford pictures for 03GT281    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
how did you run a 13.79 at 101mph w/ a 2.1 60ft.
and i ran a 14.02 @ 100mph witht the same 60ft time and same bolt ons exactly except i got a 70mm TB and a 85mm MAF and full exhuast? but i dont have nittos i have falkens gay i know. 275/40-17 rear?
help me on this one

Posts: 218 | From: FF-707/EDH-916 | Registered: Jun 2003  |  :
bunchmyfunky
CAFords Drag Racing Mod
Member # 360

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for bunchmyfunky  Ford pictures for bunchmyfunky    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
quote:
Originally posted by DropTopFox:
quote:
Originally posted by bunchmyfunky:
The 75mm TB is fine. Its not hurting anything and works good with the c&l plenum. Your car can run 13.5s or better with some DRs and good driving.

Is the 75 hurting his low end torque [Confused]
Nope not at all. The upper intake he has flows a lot more air then the stock and the 75mm TB takes advantage of it.
Posts: 2433 | From: Vacaville | Registered: Jul 2001  |  :
bunchmyfunky
CAFords Drag Racing Mod
Member # 360

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for bunchmyfunky  Ford pictures for bunchmyfunky    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
quote:
Originally posted by 03GT281:
how did you run a 13.79 at 101mph w/ a 2.1 60ft.
and i ran a 14.02 @ 100mph witht the same 60ft time and same bolt ons exactly except i got a 70mm TB and a 85mm MAF and full exhuast? but i dont have nittos i have falkens gay i know. 275/40-17 rear?
help me on this one

Just work on your driving and the time and mph will get better. How you are on your 2-3 shift really effects your mph. Practice shifting and getting off the clutch as fast as you can.
Posts: 2433 | From: Vacaville | Registered: Jul 2001  |  :
BlackNGold
CaliforniaFords.com
Moderator
Member # 655

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for BlackNGold  Ford pictures for BlackNGold    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
quote:
Originally posted by 03GT281:
how did you run a 13.79 at 101mph w/ a 2.1 60ft.
and i ran a 14.02 @ 100mph witht the same 60ft time and same bolt ons exactly except i got a 70mm TB and a 85mm MAF and full exhuast? but i dont have nittos i have falkens gay i know. 275/40-17 rear?
help me on this one

He has 3.73's.... [patriot]

--------------------
-SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT-

Posts: 5132 | From: Bay Area, CA | Registered: Dec 2001  |  :
DropTopFox
drama
Member # 1689

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for DropTopFox  Ford pictures for DropTopFox    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
quote:
Originally posted by bunchmyfunky:
quote:
Originally posted by 03GT281:
how did you run a 13.79 at 101mph w/ a 2.1 60ft.
and i ran a 14.02 @ 100mph witht the same 60ft time and same bolt ons exactly except i got a 70mm TB and a 85mm MAF and full exhuast? but i dont have nittos i have falkens gay i know. 275/40-17 rear?
help me on this one

Just work on your driving and the time and mph will get better. How you are on your 2-3 shift really effects your mph. Practice shifting and getting off the clutch as fast as you can.
try and make your body move as fast as humanly possible on every shift...also shift RPM can affect this too, he might be shifting at a better RPM [patriot]

--------------------
Go out and do something for yourself today everyone, quit depending on others

-Me
http://www.CaliforniaFords.com/cgi-bin/album.pl?album=00001689

Posts: 4003 | From: San Bruno | Registered: Aug 2002  |  :
PeNiNsula302
¯
Member # 1061

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for PeNiNsula302  Ford pictures for PeNiNsula302    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
quote:
Originally posted by 4.6GT:
no i dont power shift

start doing it, i guarantee positive results
Posts: 3423 | Registered: Mar 2002  |  :
166 Merlo
FELONY
MOTORSPORTS
Member # 1549

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for 166 Merlo  Ford pictures for 166 Merlo    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
quote:
Originally posted by PeNiNsula302:
quote:
Originally posted by 4.6GT:
no i dont power shift

start doing it, i guarantee positive results
If grinding synchos is positive, then yea do it all the time.

DON'T MISS! [burnout]

--------------------
'89 - Boss Coupe
'70 - Drop Cutthang
'68 - Cougnut
'87 - 0166, Its real

Posts: 3953 | From: Thebay | Registered: Jul 2002  |  :
PeNiNsula302
¯
Member # 1061

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for PeNiNsula302  Ford pictures for PeNiNsula302    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
quote:
Originally posted by 87 Saleen:
quote:
Originally posted by PeNiNsula302:
quote:
Originally posted by 4.6GT:
no i dont power shift

start doing it, i guarantee positive results
If grinding synchos is positive, then yea do it all the time.

DON'T MISS! [burnout]

oh well...

"it costs to be the boss"
"gotta pay to play"

sound familiar??? LOL [Big Grin] [patriot]

Posts: 3423 | Registered: Mar 2002  |  :
85GT
¯
Member # 1695

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for 85GT  Ford pictures for 85GT    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
its called "pro 50" or "steeda tri-ax" if you miss shifts with one of those shifters then you need an automatic! lol. my hurst shifter kinda sucks. but yeah i've seen as much as 3 tenths from powershifting in my friend's car.
Posts: 414 | From: Antioch | Registered: Aug 2002  |  :
4.6GT
¯
Member # 2643

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for 4.6GT  Ford pictures for 4.6GT    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
quote:
Originally posted by 03GT281:
how did you run a 13.79 at 101mph w/ a 2.1 60ft.
and i ran a 14.02 @ 100mph witht the same 60ft time and same bolt ons exactly except i got a 70mm TB and a 85mm MAF and full exhuast? but i dont have nittos i have falkens gay i know. 275/40-17 rear?
help me on this one

Better driving I guess

would it be possible to get down to the low 13's with the additon of a timings adjuster, 85mm MAF, some drag radials and better driving ????

--------------------
CAR 2002 mustang GT 5spd
254rwhp/305 ft lb torque N/A

Best E.T
1.93 60ft 13.1 @105

Posts: 320 | From: Nor Cal | Registered: Mar 2003  |  :
03GT281
¯
Member # 2944

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for 03GT281  Ford pictures for 03GT281    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
yes with DR's, and i dont see how the better driving if we got the same 60ft andyou only got one more mph then me in your ET mph, one mph shouldnt drop your time .3 seconds, i dont think
tony help me out can you put all the times from your 13.7 time slip on the board for me man thanks
jon

Posts: 218 | From: FF-707/EDH-916 | Registered: Jun 2003  |  :
bunchmyfunky
CAFords Drag Racing Mod
Member # 360

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for bunchmyfunky  Ford pictures for bunchmyfunky    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
quote:
Originally posted by 03GT281:
yes with DR's, and i dont see how the better driving if we got the same 60ft andyou only got one more mph then me in your ET mph, one mph shouldnt drop your time .3 seconds, i dont think
tony help me out can you put all the times from your 13.7 time slip on the board for me man thanks
jon

Its all about the driving. It doesn't matter if the 60fts are the same as yours. He ran faster because he is shifting his gears faster then you and he might be shifting at a different RPM also. With our cars you have to shift them between redline and 6k to take full advantage of the curve. When you shift at redline it will drop you back into your peak torque. What gear and what RPM are you going thru the traps?

--------------------
01 GT 5spd

1.76 12.79@105.49

Posts: 2433 | From: Vacaville | Registered: Jul 2001  |  :
4.6GT
¯
Member # 2643

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for 4.6GT  Ford pictures for 4.6GT    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB


[ March 27, 2004, 11:14 PM: Message edited by: 4.6GT ]

--------------------
CAR 2002 mustang GT 5spd
254rwhp/305 ft lb torque N/A

Best E.T
1.93 60ft 13.1 @105

Posts: 320 | From: Nor Cal | Registered: Mar 2003  |  :
4.6GT
¯
Member # 2643

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for 4.6GT  Ford pictures for 4.6GT    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
quote:
Originally posted by 03GT281:
yes with DR's, and i dont see how the better driving if we got the same 60ft andyou only got one more mph then me in your ET mph, one mph shouldnt drop your time .3 seconds, i dont think
tony help me out can you put all the times from your 13.7 time slip on the board for me man thanks
jon

here are the times just how it says on the slip

reaction: .404
60ft: 2.103
330ft: 5.901
1/8: 8.961
MPH (1/8): 81.039
1000: 11.570
E.T. 13.793
MPH : 101.197
there it is just how it says on the slip

--------------------
CAR 2002 mustang GT 5spd
254rwhp/305 ft lb torque N/A

Best E.T
1.93 60ft 13.1 @105

Posts: 320 | From: Nor Cal | Registered: Mar 2003  |  :
03GT281
¯
Member # 2944

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for 03GT281  Ford pictures for 03GT281    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
thanks tony and if your going to get some DR's maybe we can go together so theyll hook us up a little something just hit me up
Posts: 218 | From: FF-707/EDH-916 | Registered: Jun 2003  |  :
03GT281
¯
Member # 2944

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for 03GT281  Ford pictures for 03GT281    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
i see the diff it must be the driving good job tony [Big Grin]

here go my times

REACTION: .430
I1: 2.127
I2: 5.923
I3: 9.061
MPH (I3): 77.859
I4: 11.755
E.T. 14.022
TRAP: 100.584

things start to slow down for me at the 1/8mile when i only hit 77mph and you were in the 80's its the driving i gotta work on it [Frown]

Posts: 218 | From: FF-707/EDH-916 | Registered: Jun 2003  |  :


 
Post New Topic  Post a Ford message board Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
Hop To:

Questions/Requests/Suggestions? email CAFords



Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com