|
Author
|
Topic: whats next, help me decide
|
season'd 88
¯
Member # 169
|
posted
 
 
ok.. ive procured some breathing improvements(80mm MAF, n/a pwr pipe,80mm TB)and would like some opinion as to what my next step should be. Im also stepping up to a 1 3/4" header. Should i consider a better intake or maybe a cam? or leave well enough alone and focus on chassis/traction devices? or?
[ August 07, 2003, 06:26 PM: Message edited by: season'd 88 ]
Posts: 1383 | Registered: Feb 2001
| :
|
|
AaronC
¯
Member # 86
|
posted
How about the new RPM 2? It's supposed to have larger runners and be slightly shorter. From what I've been hearing it sounds like it should match the heads pretty good. If you ever upgrade to a larger cam, I'd do it last.
Regardless of what you do, it's already fast as shit! ![[worship]](graemlins/worship.gif)
--------------------
1991 GT Convertible: Stock 157k mile shortblock, HiTech cam, AFR 165 heads, Edelbrock RPM intake, 1 3/4 headers
12.23 at 112.99
Best MPH 113.97
Posts: 776 | From: woodland | Registered: Dec 2000
| :
|
|
Primer GR40
¯
Member # 476
|
posted
Why not go 1 7/8" if your upgrading?
What do you 60ft right now? Seems by your time you could use some more suspension. ![[Confused]](confused.gif)
--------------------
Superdupercharged Cobra
No Transmatic Notch
Posts: 2108 | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
season'd 88
¯
Member # 169
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Primer GR40:
Why not go 1 7/8" if your upgrading?
What do you 60ft right now? Seems by your time you could use some more suspension.
i could always use some suspension stuff and what i 60ft is not consistant, i think high 1.6s or 1.7s
Posts: 1383 | Registered: Feb 2001
| :
|
|
season'd 88
¯
Member # 169
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by AaronC:
How about the new RPM 2? It's supposed to have larger runners and be slightly shorter. From what I've been hearing it sounds like it should match the heads pretty good. If you ever upgrade to a larger cam, I'd do it last.
Regardless of what you do, it's already fast as shit!
Aaron, Drew mentiond that intake also. Im not completely sold on that one yet mostly because of limited access to the upper runners for clean up. I will consider and keep it in mind though...thanks for the fast comment
Posts: 1383 | Registered: Feb 2001
| :
|
|
93PONY
Mr. Valve Events
Member # 60
|
posted
Glad you're getting rid of the intake/exhaust restrictions! I don't think you'll see much gain from the headers at this point though. (due to cam design)
I like the intake you have now. Although, I do think an RPM 2 would add ~10hp/tq due to the tappered runners.
I think you should do a (much) larger cam. ![[Wink]](wink.gif)
Perhaps a 232/236 111LSA using the XE lobes.
--------------------
www.advancedenginedevelopment.com
SCT dealer
Dynotuning
(916)715-7569
Posts: 4265 | From: Fair Oaks, CA | Registered: Nov 2000
| :
|
|
season'd 88
¯
Member # 169
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 93PONY:
Glad you're getting rid of the intake/exhaust restrictions! I don't think you'll see much gain from the headers at this point though. (due to cam design)
I like the intake you have now. Although, I do think an RPM 2 would add ~10hp/tq due to the tappered runners.
I think you should do a (much) larger cam.
Perhaps a 232/236 111LSA using the XE lobes.
maybe ill let you spec my next cam...no tony curtis stage IIIs for me.
Posts: 1383 | Registered: Feb 2001
| :
|
|
Jeff S
¯
Member # 371
|
posted
If you are trying to make you car faster/quicker, then I wouldn't change anything on the motor until you get your suspension working and start pulling some low 1.5, high 1.4 60's
--------------------
'90 Mustang LX: 8.53 @ 157.92 w/ 1.33 60' on DR's
'10 ZR1: FOR SALE
'14 E63 S: RENNtech ECU
'04 Gallardo: UGR TTG
Posts: 2121 | From: San Jose, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
JoeT
¯
Member # 298
|
posted
I'm a fan of the Holley intake myself, that and a cam could do wonders. N-71 or N-91 though, lol.
Posts: 6785 | From: San Jose | Registered: Jun 2001
| :
|
|
LAST302
¯
Member # 808
|
posted
365rwhp, n/a.......
Posts: 1147 | From: Disco Bay | Registered: Jan 2002
| :
|
|
Coupe
¯
Member # 3001
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Jeff S:
If you are trying to make you car faster/quicker, then I wouldn't change anything on the motor until you get your suspension working and start pulling some low 1.5, high 1.4 60's
Posts: 284 | Registered: Jun 2003
| :
|
|
season'd 88
¯
Member # 169
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Jeff S:
If you are trying to make you car faster/quicker, then I wouldn't change anything on the motor until you get your suspension working and start pulling some low 1.5, high 1.4 60's
Im having a roll bar installed that might change the way the car launches, who knows. Im also considering one of these sway bars(drag bars) whatever there called. I know my stiff front springs are not helping either.
Posts: 1383 | Registered: Feb 2001
| :
|
|
season'd 88
¯
Member # 169
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by shade-:
I'm a fan of the Holley intake myself, that and a cam could do wonders. N-71 or N-91 though, lol.
are those some of the AFM top secret grinds?
Posts: 1383 | Registered: Feb 2001
| :
|
|
turbo302
¯
Member # 2786
|
posted
leave well enough alone and focus on chassis/traction devices.
I agree with Jeff S. I think you would benefit more from suspension and chassis work. Remember ET is 60ft, if your car doesn't hook, you won't have a good ET. I would go with a drag bar, spiral bushing upper and lower control arms, torque boxes fully welded, axle tube housings fully welded. If you pick up a tenth in 60ft., it usually transfers to 3-4 tenths by the end of the 1/4 mi. My vote is for making the car hook! With the MPH you have, there's more ET in the car with traction. If you want some ideas check out our site.
--------------------
turbo302
10.20/133
Big Boy Racing Fabrication
www.bigboyracing.com
Posts: 83 | From: bay area | Registered: May 2003
| :
|
|
Coupe
¯
Member # 3001
|
posted
how fast do you want to go?
Posts: 284 | Registered: Jun 2003
| :
|
|
JoeT
¯
Member # 298
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by season'd 88:
are those some of the AFM top secret grinds?
shhhh! ![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
--------------------
1984 Ford Tempo AOD--- RIP
Posts: 6785 | From: San Jose | Registered: Jun 2001
| :
|
|
season'd 88
¯
Member # 169
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by blownpny:
how fast do you want to go?
fast enough to hang both front wheels through the 60' mark...lol
Posts: 1383 | Registered: Feb 2001
| :
|
|
season'd 88
¯
Member # 169
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by turbo302:
leave well enough alone and focus on chassis/traction devices.
I agree with Jeff S. I think you would benefit more from suspension and chassis work. Remember ET is 60ft, if your car doesn't hook, you won't have a good ET. I would go with a drag bar, spiral bushing upper and lower control arms, torque boxes fully welded, axle tube housings fully welded. If you pick up a tenth in 60ft., it usually transfers to 3-4 tenths by the end of the 1/4 mi. My vote is for making the car hook! With the MPH you have, there's more ET in the car with traction. If you want some ideas check out our site.
This drag bar you mention, could you describe the benifets and draw backs to such a device? any noise,clunking,vibration on a street car? Please educate. ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
Posts: 1383 | Registered: Feb 2001
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
