|
Author
|
Topic: chick gets owned on facebook
|
drews50
CAFords OG
Member # 2670
|
posted
 
 
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
--------------------
*shiftylx*
2013 Race Red 5.0 "Lucy"
1967 Lime Gold 289 coupe "Ethel"
Posts: 2457 | From: phoenix | Registered: Apr 2003
| :
|
|
510_SVT
¯
Member # 8705
|
posted
HAHA she got BURNED!
--------------------
/96 Cobra/
//87' LX h.c.i//
Posts: 1306 | From: 510EastBay | Registered: Oct 2008
| :
|
|
NEIGHT
¯
Member # 8741
|
posted
Ouch that one hurt even I felt the burn on that one ![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif) ![[Razz]](tongue.gif) ![[worship]](graemlins/worship.gif)
--------------------
-Savage Habits-
1992 Summer Edition
1986 Hatch- catfish killer
1964 Impala hard top
Posts: 18533 | From: EA$T $IDE REDWOOD CITY | Registered: Nov 2008
| :
|
|
90FoX
FoX
Member # 1974
|
posted
Oh shit...haha dumb broad!
She can't even do simple tasks correctly haha
Who calls anyone a "wanker"? lmao
Posts: 5364 | From: Shooting Skeet | Registered: Oct 2002
| :
|
|
djlopez916
¯
Member # 8787
|
posted
Jesus
--------------------
89 GT VERT work in progress
05 v6 stang
97 Ford expedition
Posts: 827 | From: South Sac | Registered: Dec 2008
| :
|
|
SheerSliver03
¯
Member # 6589
|
posted
i think that is a little out of line for a boss to publicly respond like that. but the girl is still a tard
--------------------
2003 Altima SE
1970 Mustang Coupe *Sold
Posts: 641 | From: elk grove | Registered: Mar 2006
| :
|
|
DIRTY SALLY
¯
Member # 7845
|
posted
hahahahahahahaha damn! retarded ass bitch! lol
--------------------
---------
Savage Habits
instagram @2cheezen
Posts: 9145 | Registered: Aug 2007
| :
|
|
foxbodywagon
¯
Member # 5977
|
posted
Hahahahahaha... That is great...
--------------------
85 LTD wagon -under construction-
Posts: 122 | From: Central Valley | Registered: Aug 2005
| :
|
|
Jdub07
( O Y O )
Member # 2728
|
posted
who add's their boss to facebook? she should be fired just for doing that
Posts: 7282 | Registered: Apr 2003
| :
|
|
AbominableSnoman...
¯
Member # 8290
|
posted
owned
--------------------
"I aint no crip, but i bleed blue..."
Posts: 1348 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Mar 2008
| :
|
|
KINGROY
¯
Member # 7736
|
posted
I don't believe this. Fisrt, I highly doubt it's legal to fire someone on a social network. Second, I doubt that the boss has the power to fire someone on the spot unless it was a small business and he was the owner. Employment terminations have to go through HR 1st. Lastly, who cares what someone has to say about their boss online. And if she got fired for calling her boss a "wanker" on a social network, then that'll be a violation of her freedom of speech.
Sorry for the buzz kill. But I call BS on this one.
--------------------
2003 Cobra Vert
2005 Prius
Posts: 1642 | From: Vallejo, CA | Registered: Jun 2007
| :
|
|
hidnn.o.s.
¯
Member # 1219
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:
Employment terminations have to go through HR 1st.
BULLSHIT, not in their 6 month trial, if that's what's in their contract when hired, which is common.
--------------------
R.I.P. Willie G. You are missed on this forum
Posts: 15950 | Registered: Apr 2002
| :
|
|
xvt's 85 5.0
¯
Member # 4765
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:
I don't believe this. Fisrt, I highly doubt it's legal to fire someone on a social network. Second, I doubt that the boss has the power to fire someone on the spot unless it was a small business and he was the owner. Employment terminations have to go through HR 1st. Lastly, who cares what someone has to say about their boss online. And if she got fired for calling her boss a "wanker" on a social network, then that'll be a violation of her freedom of speech.
Sorry for the buzz kill. But I call BS on this one.
FYI facebook is not limited to the USA
--------------------
CBR 600RR
CBR 600 F4
Posts: 489 | From: San Jose | Registered: Aug 2004
| :
|
|
KINGROY
¯
Member # 7736
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by hidnn.o.s.:
quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:
Employment terminations have to go through HR 1st.
BULLSHIT, not in their 6 month trial, if that's what's in their contract when hired, which is common.
Still have to go through HR, unless he is the owner. Yes, it's a whole lot easier to fire someone under probation, but the fact remains the same. The boss has to go through HR 1st.
--------------------
2003 Cobra Vert
2005 Prius
Posts: 1642 | From: Vallejo, CA | Registered: Jun 2007
| :
|
|
asskickn88
¯
Member # 4957
|
posted
This appears to be in England or somewhere over there and so you never know how the laws are written or applied. The way she posted it looks just like one of those stupid little girls that are better than everyone else, I had an EX that acted just like that.
--------------------
Three 540 Bimmers and a 5.0 Explorer.... got a Ford back in the stable!
It's time for the country to do what Obama's own father did.
Abandon him.
Posts: 6069 | From: Rocklin, Ca | Registered: Oct 2004
| :
|
|
|
|
KINGROY
¯
Member # 7736
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by xvt's 85 5.0:
quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:
I don't believe this. Fisrt, I highly doubt it's legal to fire someone on a social network. Second, I doubt that the boss has the power to fire someone on the spot unless it was a small business and he was the owner. Employment terminations have to go through HR 1st. Lastly, who cares what someone has to say about their boss online. And if she got fired for calling her boss a "wanker" on a social network, then that'll be a violation of her freedom of speech.
Sorry for the buzz kill. But I call BS on this one.
FYI facebook is not limited to the USA
You're right. and cafords is not limited to california
--------------------
2003 Cobra Vert
2005 Prius
Posts: 1642 | From: Vallejo, CA | Registered: Jun 2007
| :
|
|
hidnn.o.s.
¯
Member # 1219
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:
quote:
Originally posted by hidnn.o.s.:
quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:
Employment terminations have to go through HR 1st.
BULLSHIT, not in their 6 month trial, if that's what's in their contract when hired, which is common.
Still have to go through HR, unless he is the owner. Yes, it's a whole lot easier to fire someone under probation, but the fact remains the same. The boss has to go through HR 1st.
WRONG!
--------------------
R.I.P. Willie G. You are missed on this forum
Posts: 15950 | Registered: Apr 2002
| :
|
|
N8
¯
Member # 6048
|
posted
kinda reminds me of the time, I was in a webEx meeting and the presenter shared his desktop rather than shared his program. And we saw all the shit he was talking over instant messenger about a co-worker that was on the webEx meeting. It was the most uncomfortable meeting ever. I mean he ripped for about a good 10 minutes while in this meeting. Finally someone said "Erm John, we can see what you are writing". It was eery silence then a pink slip after that.
Posts: 11638 | Registered: Sep 2005
| :
|
|
N8
¯
Member # 6048
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by hidnn.o.s.:
quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:
quote:
Originally posted by hidnn.o.s.:
quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:
Employment terminations have to go through HR 1st.
BULLSHIT, not in their 6 month trial, if that's what's in their contract when hired, which is common.
Still have to go through HR, unless he is the owner. Yes, it's a whole lot easier to fire someone under probation, but the fact remains the same. The boss has to go through HR 1st.
WRONG!
RIGHT (well in most corporate cases). Also depends on if the employee is a employee versus a contractor. And unless it was witnessed typed by the individual that firing would not stand up in court. As she can say her account was compromised. I have seen this happen before.
Posts: 11638 | Registered: Sep 2005
| :
|
|
xvt's 85 5.0
¯
Member # 4765
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:
quote:
Originally posted by xvt's 85 5.0:
quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:
I don't believe this. Fisrt, I highly doubt it's legal to fire someone on a social network. Second, I doubt that the boss has the power to fire someone on the spot unless it was a small business and he was the owner. Employment terminations have to go through HR 1st. Lastly, who cares what someone has to say about their boss online. And if she got fired for calling her boss a "wanker" on a social network, then that'll be a violation of her freedom of speech.
Sorry for the buzz kill. But I call BS on this one.
FYI facebook is not limited to the USA
You're right. and cafords is not limited to california
FYI is in the UK
--------------------
CBR 600RR
CBR 600 F4
Posts: 489 | From: San Jose | Registered: Aug 2004
| :
|
|
SPIDER_STANG
¯
Member # 8658
|
posted
LoL
--------------------
02 GT Conv Sold
92 LX coup Sold
94 Gt Conv
Spurs, Saints, Dodgers! We win baby!!
Posts: 1722 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Sep 2008
| :
|
|
TubeSteakJohnson
¯
Member # 8967
|
posted
I call ![[BS flag]](graemlins/bs_flag.gif) on this. What you say or do on your OWN time is your business. Cannot be fired or dismissed for that.
--------------------
--FREE BEER--
Posts: 583 | Registered: Feb 2009
| :
|
|
liftedF150
¯
Member # 868
|
posted
depends on what or if they had a handbook and what was written in that book. If she is defacing the company then they may have just cause for termination but to me it all seems like a nice little internet spoof. I watch what i say on facebook because my boss is on there as well as coworkers...
--------------------
GO SHARKS!
Posts: 3259 | From: Discovery Bay | Registered: Feb 2002
| :
|
|
LETHL 03
¯
Member # 5401
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by shiftylx:
ooops! lol
--------------------
RIP Willie Guzman LQ9SN95
Hard Head Muscle
#HHM #babydickcobra #lethl03
Posts: 4128 | From: 702 HHM | Registered: Feb 2005
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
