|
Author
|
Topic: 24s or 30s for my set up?
|
fordfiveoh
¯
Member # 13107
|
posted
 
 
I wanna know what size injectors are ideal for my set up.
I've got a rebuilt bottom end (built last year) with a e303, aluminum svo turbo swirl heads, 1.7 ford Motorsport rockers, explorer intake, 65mm throttle body, mac cold air intake, straight pipe exhaust etc.
I currently have 24lb injectors in the car right now and have a set of 30s with matching maf laying in the garage. Would there be any upside to getting the 30s put in or are the 24s just fine where they are at now?
Posts: 180 | From: Vallejo, CA | Registered: Aug 2013
| :
|
|
92_5.0
¯
Member # 7624
|
posted
24's are fine for that set up
--------------------
Infineon/Sears point? same difference!
11.8 @ 115 mph @ Sac Raceway
411 rwhp 402 trq (old set up)
540 rwhp 517 rwtrq (new set up)
ET's to come
Posts: 1629 | From: bay area | Registered: May 2007
| :
|
|
fordfiveoh
¯
Member # 13107
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 92_5.0:
24's are fine for that set up
Okay cool! Do you know what the limit is to the 24s and when 30s would be needed? I plan on doing 3.55 gears next, I've got 3.08s right now. Not sure if the gearing would call for more fuel but I'd say I've got a finished motor as far as all my planned mods go.
Posts: 180 | From: Vallejo, CA | Registered: Aug 2013
| :
|
|
Tom Renzo
¯
Member # 13165
|
posted
24 lb injectors will support 300Hp @ 80% DC and fed with 43 Lbs of fuel pressure.
[ 2014-09-18, 05:04 PM: Message edited by: Tom Renzo ]
--------------------
I spend money i don't have. Building cars i don't need. To impress people i don't know.
Posts: 557 | From: CT | Registered: Sep 2013
| :
|
|
fordfiveoh
¯
Member # 13107
|
posted
Cool, good to know. Thanks guys!
Posts: 180 | From: Vallejo, CA | Registered: Aug 2013
| :
|
|
92_5.0
¯
Member # 7624
|
posted
you can change the gearing all you want, it has no effect to the need for more fuel. If you dont already have one, I would recommend getting an adjustable fuel pressure regulator, preferably Aeromotive brand ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
--------------------
Infineon/Sears point? same difference!
11.8 @ 115 mph @ Sac Raceway
411 rwhp 402 trq (old set up)
540 rwhp 517 rwtrq (new set up)
ET's to come
Posts: 1629 | From: bay area | Registered: May 2007
| :
|
|
Duncan Motors
¯
Member # 7045
|
posted
do not use areomotive brand at all. ihave had 5 bad in a row on numerous cars, junk
Posts: 6310 | From: Vallejo | Registered: Sep 2006
| :
|
|
fordfiveoh
¯
Member # 13107
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Duncan Motors:
do not use areomotive brand at all. ihave had 5 bad in a row on numerous cars, junk
This is me John! We just had this convo last night at your shop! lol
Posts: 180 | From: Vallejo, CA | Registered: Aug 2013
| :
|
|
92_5.0
¯
Member # 7624
|
posted
wow, I was always told Aeromotive was one of the best and BBK was junk lol. I've been running my Aeromotive for about 7 years now, no issues.
--------------------
Infineon/Sears point? same difference!
11.8 @ 115 mph @ Sac Raceway
411 rwhp 402 trq (old set up)
540 rwhp 517 rwtrq (new set up)
ET's to come
Posts: 1629 | From: bay area | Registered: May 2007
| :
|
|
fordfiveoh
¯
Member # 13107
|
posted
They're all roughly the same price so if one starts acting up on me I'll get my money back and get the other
Posts: 180 | From: Vallejo, CA | Registered: Aug 2013
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
