T O P I C R E V I E W
|
Green_Machine650
Member # 10459
|
posted
I have a 5.0 mustang fox body.It has a 302 with edlebrok aluminum performers,air gap lower intake,e303 cam,650 double pumper,shorty headers with 373 gears.My question is about how much hp do u think i am putting out roughly.always wondered.
|
MauriSSio
Member # 9943
|
posted
285-300rwhp?>??
|
sydewayzLX50
Member # 10217
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by MauriSSio: 285-300rwhp?>??
+1
|
copcar
Member # 10113
|
posted
Ditto on the 285-300 at the flywheel.
|
a302juGRnuat
Member # 10163
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by copcar: Ditto on the 285-300 at the flywheel.
he said rwhp
|
MauriSSio
Member # 9943
|
posted
wait, is this an automatic or manual transmission?
|
Driftking209
Member # 10458
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Green_Machine650: I have a 5.0 mustang fox body.It has a 302 with edlebrok aluminum performers,air gap lower intake,e303 cam,650 double pumper,shorty headers with 373 gears.My question is about how much hp do u think i am putting out roughly.always wondered.
Just got a dumb question lol what are edlebrok aluminum performers?
|
sydewayzLX50
Member # 10217
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Driftking209: quote: Originally posted by Green_Machine650: I have a 5.0 mustang fox body.It has a 302 with edlebrok aluminum performers,air gap lower intake,e303 cam,650 double pumper,shorty headers with 373 gears.My question is about how much hp do u think i am putting out roughly.always wondered.
Just got a dumb question lol what are edlebrok aluminum performers?
I'm assuming cylinder heads
|
Ham n'Eggs
Member # 8967
|
posted
265-270hp
|
50Reasons
Member # 6452
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Ham n'Eggs: 265-270hp
+1
|
Green_Machine650
Member # 10459
|
posted
its a 5 speed an my bad ya cylinder heads.
|
MauriSSio
Member # 9943
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Ham n'Eggs: 265-270hp
really? so youre guessing maybe 20hp more than just a regular 5.0 with boltons despite having heads that flow 65-75cfm more (225-230cfm vs 155-160cfm) AND an aftermarket cam??
stock 5.0 = 225hp boltons = typically 245+hp heads cam = 265-270?
sure that cam and heads aint the best ones on the market but i think theyd be worth way more than that. 265-270hp equates to roughly 225rwhp. too low IMO.
|
Ham n'Eggs
Member # 8967
|
posted
Youd be surprised; stock 5.0=215-220hp. 40hp gain with his additions. [ February 24, 2011, 03:27 PM: Message edited by: Ham n'Eggs ]
|
Driftking209
Member # 10458
|
posted
I would say atleast 240-250 to the wheels
|
MauriSSio
Member # 9943
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Ham n'Eggs: Youd be surprised; stock 5.0=215-220hp. 40hp gain with his additions.
youre trippin, 40hp with all the boltons maybe but not with the addition of the cylinder heads and cam. the heads are the major restriction in the 5.0
|
Ham n'Eggs
Member # 8967
|
posted
No not tripping. Seen it before. People will add shit together on paper and ASSUME that it will be the same once it is all slapped together. Guess he will have to get it dynoed and find out.
|
MauriSSio
Member # 9943
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Ham n'Eggs: No not tripping. Seen it before. People will add shit together on paper and ASSUME that it will be the same once it is all slapped together. Guess he will have to get it dynoed and find out.
youre talking bad about ASSUMING while doing some assuming yourself though. What about that combo bothers you?
|
Ham n'Eggs
Member # 8967
|
posted
I'm not assuming anything. If you took the time to see what I wrote, you'll see that I stated, "People will add shit together on paper and ASSUME that it will be the same once it is all slapped together". I made NO assumtion.
|
MauriSSio
Member # 9943
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Ham n'Eggs: I'm not assuming anything. If you took the time to see what I wrote, you'll see that I stated, "People will add shit together on paper and ASSUME that it will be the same once it is all slapped together". I made NO assumtion.
youre assuming the original poster did that.
|
copcar
Member # 10113
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by a302juGRnuat: quote: Originally posted by copcar: Ditto on the 285-300 at the flywheel.
he said rwhp
Yeah, should have used a comma. 270-285 at the flywheel. Probably 240-250 rwhp.
|
Ham n'Eggs
Member # 8967
|
posted
Guessing, Opinionating does not mean assuming.
|
*EPIK*
Member # 7481
|
posted
I don't anything about carburated setups, but my 91 with a stock bottom end 5.0 with Edelbrock heads (2.02/1.60 valves), Edelbrock RPM2 manifold, E303 cam, longtubes, full exhaust, smog pump & ac deletes, & a 70mm TB made 300 rwhp/320rwtq. This was also untuned with a 100% bone stock fuel system. [ February 25, 2011, 01:49 AM: Message edited by: *EPIK* ]
|