Author
|
Topic: 300hp na...how much with 10#'s or boost from s trim?
|
Jaejae5.0
¯
Member # 7958
|
posted
gimme some numbers chief..thinkin of going a charger route
-------------------- 1987 notchback h/c/i 302 & 70mm turbo SOLD
2000 camaro ss cam only
Posts: 4890 | From: the combustion chamber | Registered: Oct 2007
| :
|
|
adower
¯
Member # 5955
|
posted
I bet 450rwhp.
-------------------- 98 Cobra Griggs S Trim HRE
Posts: 3327 | Registered: Aug 2005
| :
|
|
92stangLX
¯
Member # 3252
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by adower: I bet 450rwhp.
Depending on the combo 400-450. Figure 10-15 HP per pound of boost.
Posts: 5302 | From: San Francisco | Registered: Sep 2003
| :
|
|
|
|
Jaejae5.0
¯
Member # 7958
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 92stangLX: quote: Originally posted by adower: I bet 450rwhp.
Depending on the combo 400-450. Figure 10-15 HP per pound of boost.
i only want 400 at the wheel..dont wanna take the stock block to far..or is 450rwhp safe??..lmao
-------------------- 1987 notchback h/c/i 302 & 70mm turbo SOLD
2000 camaro ss cam only
Posts: 4890 | From: the combustion chamber | Registered: Oct 2007
| :
|
|
stangin'
¯
Member # 514
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by jaejae: quote: Originally posted by 92stangLX: quote: Originally posted by adower: I bet 450rwhp.
Depending on the combo 400-450. Figure 10-15 HP per pound of boost.
i only want 400 at the wheel..dont wanna take the stock block to far..or is 450rwhp safe??..lmao
safe enough until it goes, lol. i have the basic hci setup and 9#s of boost, dynoed 462rwhp.
Posts: 2993 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Oct 2001
| :
|
|
5LiterSpeeder
¯
Member # 8234
|
posted
A friend of mine has pretty much the same set up as i've got; tfs tw heads, f cam and tfs R with 10#'s from an s-trim and he dynoed 481rwhp
-------------------- 93'Ex 4cyl Notch TFS H/C/I 3.55s 4 wheel Cobra brakes, V2-SQ, 14 psi RIP BRANDON, SILVERLX-
Posts: 561 | From: Healdsburg | Registered: Feb 2008
| :
|
|
CornOil_&_Boost
¯
Member # 5888
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 5LiterSpeeder: A friend of mine has pretty much the same set up as i've got; tfs tw heads, f cam and tfs R with 10#'s from an s-trim and he dynoed 481rwhp
look at his HCi combo...it is one of the most basic combos around....and definitely not "boost" friendly. JJ...at 10lbs, you'll be around 400-410Rw mark....
-------------------- https://www.facebook.com/pushrodpoweredmustangs '95 Cobra - small engine / small turbo - '02 Excursion 7.3 - tow vehicle '14 - Chevy Volt - DD
Posts: 5097 | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
Jaejae5.0
¯
Member # 7958
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 5LiterSpeeder: A friend of mine has pretty much the same set up as i've got; tfs tw heads, f cam and tfs R with 10#'s from an s-trim and he dynoed 481rwhp
wow
-------------------- 1987 notchback h/c/i 302 & 70mm turbo SOLD
2000 camaro ss cam only
Posts: 4890 | From: the combustion chamber | Registered: Oct 2007
| :
|
|
92stangLX
¯
Member # 3252
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by jaejae: quote: Originally posted by 92stangLX: quote: Originally posted by adower: I bet 450rwhp.
Depending on the combo 400-450. Figure 10-15 HP per pound of boost.
i only want 400 at the wheel..dont wanna take the stock block to far..or is 450rwhp safe??..lmao
Depends on who you ask It's all in the tune. If it isn't tuned right something will let go for sure.. LOL
Posts: 5302 | From: San Francisco | Registered: Sep 2003
| :
|
|
32VSTANG
¯
Member # 9803
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 50Deep_jocks_03/04_Cobras: quote: Originally posted by 5LiterSpeeder: A friend of mine has pretty much the same set up as i've got; tfs tw heads, f cam and tfs R with 10#'s from an s-trim and he dynoed 481rwhp
look at his HCi combo...it is one of the most basic combos around....and definitely not "boost" friendly. JJ...at 10lbs, you'll be around 400-410Rw mark....
Why is this not boost friendly??
Posts: 1721 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Feb 2010
| :
|
|
32VSTANG
¯
Member # 9803
|
posted
I also bet you will be around 450-500..I'm waiting to dyno mine. Me and you kinda have da same set up. Depends on size pulley also. I have da 2.75 on my blower.
Posts: 1721 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Feb 2010
| :
|
|
|
CornOil_&_Boost
¯
Member # 5888
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by gohardgohome: quote: Originally posted by 50Deep_jocks_03/04_Cobras: quote: Originally posted by 5LiterSpeeder: A friend of mine has pretty much the same set up as i've got; tfs tw heads, f cam and tfs R with 10#'s from an s-trim and he dynoed 481rwhp
look at his HCi combo...it is one of the most basic combos around....and definitely not "boost" friendly. JJ...at 10lbs, you'll be around 400-410Rw mark....
Why is this not boost friendly??
small chambered and valved heads, intake is one of the most basic around (ported or not) and cam is not the best either......have fun getting 450-500Rw out of that....where the rest coming form? hopes and dreams?
-------------------- https://www.facebook.com/pushrodpoweredmustangs '95 Cobra - small engine / small turbo - '02 Excursion 7.3 - tow vehicle '14 - Chevy Volt - DD
Posts: 5097 | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
32VSTANG
¯
Member # 9803
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 50Deep_jocks_03/04_Cobras: quote: Originally posted by gohardgohome: quote: Originally posted by 50Deep_jocks_03/04_Cobras: quote: Originally posted by 5LiterSpeeder: A friend of mine has pretty much the same set up as i've got; tfs tw heads, f cam and tfs R with 10#'s from an s-trim and he dynoed 481rwhp
look at his HCi combo...it is one of the most basic combos around....and definitely not "boost" friendly. JJ...at 10lbs, you'll be around 400-410Rw mark....
Why is this not boost friendly??
small chambered and valved heads, intake is one of the most basic around (ported or not) and cam is not the best either......have fun getting 450-500Rw out of that....where the rest coming form? hopes and dreams?
What would u prefer..heads and intake? Cam?
Posts: 1721 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Feb 2010
| :
|
|
Jaejae5.0
¯
Member # 7958
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 50Deep_jocks_03/04_Cobras: quote: Originally posted by gohardgohome: quote: Originally posted by 50Deep_jocks_03/04_Cobras: quote: Originally posted by 5LiterSpeeder: A friend of mine has pretty much the same set up as i've got; tfs tw heads, f cam and tfs R with 10#'s from an s-trim and he dynoed 481rwhp
look at his HCi combo...it is one of the most basic combos around....and definitely not "boost" friendly. JJ...at 10lbs, you'll be around 400-410Rw mark....
Why is this not boost friendly??
small chambered and valved heads, intake is one of the most basic around (ported or not) and cam is not the best either......have fun getting 450-500Rw out of that....where the rest coming form? hopes and dreams?
i will be completly happy with 400 to the wheel..lol..450 sounds nice tho...ikm thinkin im aend up around 420-430 with a ton of tq
-------------------- 1987 notchback h/c/i 302 & 70mm turbo SOLD
2000 camaro ss cam only
Posts: 4890 | From: the combustion chamber | Registered: Oct 2007
| :
|
|
CornOil_&_Boost
¯
Member # 5888
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by gohardgohome: quote: Originally posted by 50Deep_jocks_03/04_Cobras: quote: Originally posted by gohardgohome: quote: Originally posted by 50Deep_jocks_03/04_Cobras: quote: Originally posted by 5LiterSpeeder: A friend of mine has pretty much the same set up as i've got; tfs tw heads, f cam and tfs R with 10#'s from an s-trim and he dynoed 481rwhp
look at his HCi combo...it is one of the most basic combos around....and definitely not "boost" friendly. JJ...at 10lbs, you'll be around 400-410Rw mark....
Why is this not boost friendly??
small chambered and valved heads, intake is one of the most basic around (ported or not) and cam is not the best either......have fun getting 450-500Rw out of that....where the rest coming form? hopes and dreams?
What would u prefer..heads and intake? Cam?
on a stock motor? TW heads or AFR 165's, custom cam, and Systemax intake.. [ August 13, 2010, 06:23 PM: Message edited by: 50Deep_jocks_03/04_Cobras ]
-------------------- https://www.facebook.com/pushrodpoweredmustangs '95 Cobra - small engine / small turbo - '02 Excursion 7.3 - tow vehicle '14 - Chevy Volt - DD
Posts: 5097 | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
Jaejae5.0
¯
Member # 7958
|
posted
i know the cobra lower is a basic intake and what not..but its hard to part with my gt40..it looks so sick in the engine bay..im willing to sacrafice some horse for this joint..lol
-------------------- 1987 notchback h/c/i 302 & 70mm turbo SOLD
2000 camaro ss cam only
Posts: 4890 | From: the combustion chamber | Registered: Oct 2007
| :
|
|
32VSTANG
¯
Member # 9803
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 50Deep_jocks_03/04_Cobras: quote: Originally posted by gohardgohome: quote: Originally posted by 50Deep_jocks_03/04_Cobras: quote: Originally posted by gohardgohome: quote: Originally posted by 50Deep_jocks_03/04_Cobras: quote: Originally posted by 5LiterSpeeder: A friend of mine has pretty much the same set up as i've got; tfs tw heads, f cam and tfs R with 10#'s from an s-trim and he dynoed 481rwhp
look at his HCi combo...it is one of the most basic combos around....and definitely not "boost" friendly. JJ...at 10lbs, you'll be around 400-410Rw mark....
Why is this not boost friendly??
small chambered and valved heads, intake is one of the most basic around (ported or not) and cam is not the best either......have fun getting 450-500Rw out of that....where the rest coming form? hopes and dreams?
What would u prefer..heads and intake? Cam?
on a stock motor? TW heads or AFR 165's, custom cam, and Systemax intake..
Sounds good. I have a systemax yet to install. I have a b31 cam on a non stock motor. Have bottom end also. I wonder how much I will make. Can't wait
Posts: 1721 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Feb 2010
| :
|
|
32VSTANG
¯
Member # 9803
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by jaejae: i know the cobra lower is a basic intake and what not..but its hard to part with my gt40..it looks so sick in the engine bay..im willing to sacrafice some horse for this joint..lol
Jaejae I feel u man..lol specially when its all powder coated nicely lol.
Posts: 1721 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Feb 2010
| :
|
|
92stangLX
¯
Member # 3252
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by jaejae: i know the cobra lower is a basic intake and what not..but its hard to part with my gt40..it looks so sick in the engine bay..im willing to sacrafice some horse for this joint..lol
Nothing wrong with the GT40.. port the lower
Posts: 5302 | From: San Francisco | Registered: Sep 2003
| :
|
|
Adam5.0
¯
Member # 6995
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 92stangLX: quote: Originally posted by jaejae: i know the cobra lower is a basic intake and what not..but its hard to part with my gt40..it looks so sick in the engine bay..im willing to sacrafice some horse for this joint..lol
Nothing wrong with the GT40.. port the lower
my cousin was pushing 450 hp through a cobra intake, its possible to make power with a gt40 or cobra, but I'm sure he could of made alittle more power with a better intake
-------------------- want something old and japanese
Posts: 1609 | From: Brentwood | Registered: Aug 2006
| :
|
|
*EPIK*
¯
Member # 7481
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by jaejae: i will be completly happy with 400 to the wheel..lol..450 sounds nice tho...ikm thinkin im aend up around 420-430 with a ton of tq
It don't matter if you end up with 400rwhp, or 450rwhp, it will be enough to give 50Deep a good run... Power to weight ratio FTMFW!!!
-------------------- =91 Notch:12.31@110 **Under Construction** =05 CTS-V: 418rwhp/393rwtq=13.01@111
http://www.djepikmusic.com
Posts: 6966 | From: 916 | Registered: Mar 2007
| :
|
|
East Bay 50
¯
Member # 8081
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by EPIK: quote: Originally posted by jaejae: i will be completly happy with 400 to the wheel..lol..450 sounds nice tho...ikm thinkin im aend up around 420-430 with a ton of tq
It don't matter if you end up with 400rwhp, or 450rwhp, it will be enough to give 50Deep a good run... Power to weight ratio FTMFW!!!
400rwhp is enough to beat Kanye....
-------------------- Kurgan tuned stroked and blown 347 foxbody. boost nukka!
Posts: 2699 | Registered: Dec 2007
| :
|
|