|
Author
|
Topic: 1992 f250 351ci?
|
sic70stang
CAFords OG
Member # 4347
|
posted
 
 
i am thinking of putting in a 351 in my old mustang. i found an engine from a f250 that is a 351. would it be worth using?
--------------------
The anti-crew
1987 rolling safety violation.
Posts: 6943 | From: California | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
sic70stang
CAFords OG
Member # 4347
|
posted
???
--------------------
The anti-crew
1987 rolling safety violation.
Posts: 6943 | From: California | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
porchstang
¯
Member # 7937
|
posted
It would be a roller block so that is a big plus the only downer is that it is not as strong as a 69-70 block. It would all depend on how much hp you are looking to make.
Posts: 114 | From: Bakersfield | Registered: Oct 2007
| :
|
|
MachYou
¯
Member # 7934
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by porchstang:
It would be a roller block so that is a big plus the only downer is that it is not as strong as a 69-70 block. It would all depend on how much hp you are looking to make.
roller 351's didnt come out till 94...
[ January 25, 2008, 07:35 AM: Message edited by: itznotahighway ]
--------------------
All Bullshit Stops When the Hands Drop
Posts: 726 | From: California | Registered: Oct 2007
| :
|
|
turbo50
¯
Member # 6700
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by itznotahighway:
quote:
Originally posted by porchstang:
It would be a roller block so that is a big plus the only downer is that it is not as strong as a 69-70 block. It would all depend on how much hp you are looking to make.
roller 351's didnt come out till 94...
That is 100% correct
--------------------
.........when was the last time YOU built something with YOUR own hands?
I offer quality sidework at reasonable prices. PM ME
Posts: 7606 | From: Discovery Bay, California | Registered: Apr 2006
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
