T O P I C R E V I E W
|
9COBRA3
Member # 4216
|
posted
thinking of tunig and dynoing my car in..but i heard there is a mustang dyno and a dyno jet ...pros?cons?...is there a difference in the two? shooting for 300hp on the mustang dyno but not sure if it'll be the same on the dyno jet
|
warhorse58gt
Member # 7702
|
posted
i stole this off another post in tech.
The main difference between the Mustang and the Dynojet is that a Mustang is a loading dyno and the Dynojet is an inertia dyno.
With an inertia dyno, the only load being placed on the vehicle is the weight of the rollers. With the Dynojet, that weight is only about 2600lbs. So if you are tuning a car on the Dynojet, you are tuning the engine to push around 2600lbs. That's fine on the dyno, but as soon as you get the car on the street, the car probably weighs closer to 3500lbs. So the engine you just tuned to push around 2600lbs is pushing around about a 1000lbs more weight. This additional load on the engine is going to cause the engine to detonate.
Whereas the Mustang is a loading dyno. We have an electromagnetic brake called an Eddy Current that allows us to apply additional load on to the vehicle. We also have a patented program called Road Load Simulation. With this program, we can simulate the weight and aerodynamic drag of the vehicle. So when you are tuning the engine on the dyno, you are tuning it to the amount of load that it normally sees on the street and therefore it won't detonate when on the street.
As for the Dynojet reading higher than the Mustang, that is correct. But if you look at almost all of the other dyno manufacturers out there, they read numbers closer to ours. About 6 months ago, there was a magazine article in "Sportscar International." This article was an interview with Mark Dobeck, the founder and original owner of Dynojet. In the articles he goes on to explain when he made his first motorcycle dyno, they weren't getting wheel horsepower numbers that he thought a certain motorcycle should get. So he incorporated a fudge factor into the number. That fudge factor has been present ever since in all of their dynos. That is why they tend to have higher dyno numbers than other dyno manufacturers.
If you have any other questions, please let me know.
Thanks,
Tim Gentil Sales Engineer Mustang Dynamometer 2300 Pinnacle Parkway Twinsburg, OH 44087 Ph: (330) 963-5400 Ext. 211 Toll Free: 1-888-468-7826 ext. 211 Fax: (330) 425-3310 Email: tim.gentil@mustangdyne.com
Comments: WOULD LIKE TO KNOW THE PRIMARY DIFFERANCE BETWEEN A MUSTANG DYNO AND A DYNOJET. I HAVE BEEN TOLD BY VERY RESPECTABLE RACERS AND TUNERS THAT YOU COULD POSSIBLY DETONATE ON A DYNO JET DUE TO NO LOAD PLACED. ALSO A DYNO JET GIVES RWHP RESULTS 10% HIGHER THAN A MUSTANG DYNO.? [ December 18, 2007, 01:04 AM: Message edited by: warhorse58gt ]
|
r3dn3ck
Member # 3192
|
posted
I just did a back to back run on both types and got exactly what you should expect from a competent dyno operator... identical results.
I got 278/332 on the mustang 750 and 280/333 on the dynojet. There was more variation from run to run on each dyno than there was between them.
I went to BRG Racing and Imports Automotive, both in Concord.
|
Thirteen Twenty
Member # 7961
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by r3dn3ck: I just did a back to back run on both types and got exactly what you should expect from a competent dyno operator... identical results.
I got 278/332 on the mustang 750 and 280/333 on the dynojet. There was more variation from run to run on each dyno than there was between them.
I went to BRG Racing and Imports Automotive, both in Concord.
|
Eddie510-
Member # 2354
|
posted
Hey hows it going 9cobra3 Dont worry about your numbers bro you still cant beat me 410's bro, keep up [ December 20, 2007, 11:45 PM: Message edited by: Eddie510- ]
|
|