Post A Reply
read DMs/my profile
login
|
join CAFords
|
search
|
faq
|
»
Northern California Ford Owners
»
Automotive
»
Tech Talk
»
Will compression work on pump gas
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.
(
how?
)
Instant Emojis
Instant UBB Code
What is UBB Code?
Options
Disable smilies in this post.
<table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" width="99%" align="center"> <tr bgcolor="#000000"><td> <table border="0" width="100%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0"> <tr bgcolor="#000099"> <td colspan="2" align="left"> <font size="2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial"> <b>T O P I C R E V I E W</b> </font></td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#dedfdf"> <td valign="top" width="18%"> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> <b>FORD POWER</b> <br /><small>Member # 7860</small> </font></td> <td width="82%"> <font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial"> <img src="https://californiafords.com/ubb/posticon.gif" border="0" alt=" - " /> posted <script language="JavaScript1.3" type="text/javascript"> document.writeln(timestamp(new Date(2007,8,15,16,0,0), dfrm, tfrm, 0, 0, 0, 0)); </script><hr /> </font> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> I am curious to know if it is an anyway possible to run 11.1.1 compression on pump gas. If so, how?<br /> Or what is the highest compresion that can be runn on pump fuel?<br /><br />This is for a 347ci block. <br /> </font> </td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#f7f7f7"> <td valign="top" width="18%"> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> <b>FasterDamnit</b> <br /><small>Member # 442</small> </font></td> <td width="82%"> <font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial"> <img src="https://californiafords.com/ubb/posticon.gif" border="0" alt=" - " /> posted <script language="JavaScript1.3" type="text/javascript"> document.writeln(timestamp(new Date(2007,8,15,16,24,0), dfrm, tfrm, 0, 0, 0, 0)); </script><hr /> </font> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> Well,<br />Not a simple answer. Static compression, combustion chamber design, aluminum vs. iron, dynamic compression (ie how big your cam is plus rest of combo), cooling efficiency, ignition timing...<br /><br /><br />Yes, 11:1 will work w/ good Al heads, good sized cam, good cooling, more gear than stock. <br /> </font> </td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#dedfdf"> <td valign="top" width="18%"> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> <b>FORD POWER</b> <br /><small>Member # 7860</small> </font></td> <td width="82%"> <font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial"> <img src="https://californiafords.com/ubb/posticon.gif" border="0" alt=" - " /> posted <script language="JavaScript1.3" type="text/javascript"> document.writeln(timestamp(new Date(2007,8,15,16,41,0), dfrm, tfrm, 0, 0, 0, 0)); </script><hr /> </font> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by FasterDamnit:<br /><strong> Well,<br />Not a simple answer. Static compression, combustion chamber design, aluminum vs. iron, dynamic compression (ie how big your cam is plus rest of combo), cooling efficiency, ignition timing...<br /><br /><br />Yes, 11:1 will work w/ good Al heads, good sized cam, good cooling, more gear than stock. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">THe cam I want to go with is the CompCam xe 282hr, I hope to get AFR 205 heads, high flow water pump. aluminum radiator and even a 165 thermostat to keep things cooler. <br /><br /> What you think? <br /> </font> </td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#f7f7f7"> <td valign="top" width="18%"> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> <b>uncle bill</b> <br /><small>Member # 3953</small> </font></td> <td width="82%"> <font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial"> <img src="https://californiafords.com/ubb/posticon.gif" border="0" alt=" - " /> posted <script language="JavaScript1.3" type="text/javascript"> document.writeln(timestamp(new Date(2007,8,15,17,7,0), dfrm, tfrm, 0, 0, 0, 0)); </script><hr /> </font> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> im running same cam, 10.5 with afr 185 on pump gas with no problem <br /> </font> </td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#dedfdf"> <td valign="top" width="18%"> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> <b>F8LSN8K</b> <br /><small>Member # 7080</small> </font></td> <td width="82%"> <font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial"> <img src="https://californiafords.com/ubb/posticon.gif" border="0" alt=" - " /> posted <script language="JavaScript1.3" type="text/javascript"> document.writeln(timestamp(new Date(2007,8,15,18,27,0), dfrm, tfrm, 0, 0, 0, 0)); </script><hr /> </font> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by FORD POWER:<br /><strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by FasterDamnit:<br /><strong> Well,<br />Not a simple answer. Static compression, combustion chamber design, aluminum vs. iron, dynamic compression (ie how big your cam is plus rest of combo), cooling efficiency, ignition timing...<br /><br /><br />Yes, 11:1 will work w/ good Al heads, good sized cam, good cooling, more gear than stock. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">THe cam I want to go with is the CompCam xe 282hr, I hope to get AFR 205 heads, high flow water pump. aluminum radiator and even a 165 thermostat to keep things cooler. <br /><br /> What you think? </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">imo, i think the 205's seem a bit too much. 185's should do fine. <br /><br />i could be wrong, but just my .02 <br /> </font> </td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#f7f7f7"> <td valign="top" width="18%"> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> <b>90lxfoxbody</b> <br /><small>Member # 6947</small> </font></td> <td width="82%"> <font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial"> <img src="https://californiafords.com/ubb/posticon.gif" border="0" alt=" - " /> posted <script language="JavaScript1.3" type="text/javascript"> document.writeln(timestamp(new Date(2007,8,15,20,59,0), dfrm, tfrm, 0, 0, 0, 0)); </script><hr /> </font> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> 205s would work depending on what intake.U would need to go with a vic style intake to utilize the head at high rpm. <br /> </font> </td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#dedfdf"> <td valign="top" width="18%"> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> <b>FORD POWER</b> <br /><small>Member # 7860</small> </font></td> <td width="82%"> <font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial"> <img src="https://californiafords.com/ubb/posticon.gif" border="0" alt=" - " /> posted <script language="JavaScript1.3" type="text/javascript"> document.writeln(timestamp(new Date(2007,8,16,13,25,0), dfrm, tfrm, 0, 0, 0, 0)); </script><hr /> </font> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> i WOULD LIKE 205 HEADS BUT IF I STICK TO 185'S THAT LEAVES SOME CASH FOR PORT WORK SO I THINK I MIGHT LEAN TOWARD THE 185'S. <br /><br /> wHAT KIND OF RWHP NUMBERS CAN I EXPECT FROM A N/A 10.5.1 347ci? XE828HR cam, AFR 185's W/ STAGE 2 PORTING, AND OUT DA BOX TFS R INTAKE. <br /> </font> </td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#f7f7f7"> <td valign="top" width="18%"> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> <b>F8LSN8K</b> <br /><small>Member # 7080</small> </font></td> <td width="82%"> <font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial"> <img src="https://californiafords.com/ubb/posticon.gif" border="0" alt=" - " /> posted <script language="JavaScript1.3" type="text/javascript"> document.writeln(timestamp(new Date(2007,8,16,17,51,0), dfrm, tfrm, 0, 0, 0, 0)); </script><hr /> </font> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by FORD POWER:<br /><strong> i WOULD LIKE 205 HEADS BUT IF I STICK TO 185'S THAT LEAVES SOME CASH FOR PORT WORK SO I THINK I MIGHT LEAN TOWARD THE 185'S. <br /><br /> wHAT KIND OF RWHP NUMBERS CAN I EXPECT FROM A N/A 10.5.1 347ci? XE828HR cam, AFR 185's W/ STAGE 2 PORTING, AND OUT DA BOX TFS R INTAKE. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">350-400rwhp roughly <br /> </font> </td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#dedfdf"> <td valign="top" width="18%"> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> <b>FORD POWER</b> <br /><small>Member # 7860</small> </font></td> <td width="82%"> <font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial"> <img src="https://californiafords.com/ubb/posticon.gif" border="0" alt=" - " /> posted <script language="JavaScript1.3" type="text/javascript"> document.writeln(timestamp(new Date(2007,8,16,19,6,0), dfrm, tfrm, 0, 0, 0, 0)); </script><hr /> </font> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> Well i'm trying to reach 425rwhp. I could always port the intake aswell to try to get there. Dyno tune is always good to find a few extra ponies <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" /> <br /> </font> </td></tr> <tr bgcolor="#f7f7f7"> <td valign="top" width="18%"> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> <b>Curt</b> <br /><small>Member # 6254</small> </font></td> <td width="82%"> <font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial"> <img src="https://californiafords.com/ubb/posticon.gif" border="0" alt=" - " /> posted <script language="JavaScript1.3" type="text/javascript"> document.writeln(timestamp(new Date(2007,8,17,2,12,0), dfrm, tfrm, 0, 0, 0, 0)); </script><hr /> </font> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial"> my Cleveland has 11 to 1 and runs fine on 91, of course its running a little rich <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="biggrin.gif" /> <br /> </font> </td></tr> </table></td></tr></table> <br /> <br />
Questions/Requests/Suggestions? email CAFords
Fueled by
Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com
