|
Author
|
Topic: Pro-charger on a 5.0 stock bottom end?
|
icall_666_yellow94GT
¯
Member # 6417
|
posted
 
 
Putting a Pro-charger on a stock bottom end, 120k,155 PSI 1-8 of a 94 mustang 5.0? 9 PSI safe or no. ![[Confused]](confused.gif) feed back plz.
--------------------
Humm... The power of cheese!
Posts: 25 | From: Pollock Pines | Registered: Jan 2006
| :
|
|
Luke87GT
Lay'n more stripes
than Caltrans
Member # 21
|
posted
the devil is in the tune.
If compression and leak-down are good, I wouldn't hesitate...
--------------------
Stangless
Posts: 7802 | From: San Mateo | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
SLOWBACK 67
¯
Member # 6348
|
posted
if you don't beat on it too bad you should be cool. i'd start a fund for a short block if or when it starts to give your ready to roll.just my 2cents. ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
--------------------
Originally posted by turbo50:
I have no intenions of keeping anyones parts or taking anyones money.
Posts: 8582 | From: Vallejo | Registered: Dec 2005
| :
|
|
mustanggt5091
All I need is.....
Member # 444
|
posted
if the motor is in healthy condition, you add the additional hardware needed for your application and get a tune you should be fine.
--------------------
88 GT 357w (SOLD):(
06 Limited Edition R6 !!!!!
Posts: 2353 | From: Fairfield / Santa Rosa , Ca | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
NO MANRZ
¯
Member # 566
|
posted
Like everyone said, with a solid fuel system and tune, you'll be fine. Should make something in the lower 300rwhp range with exhaust. Most people add aluminum heads, intake and cam before the supercharger for 400+ rwhp.
--------------------
Bring It . . .
Posts: 1938 | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
icall_666_yellow94GT
¯
Member # 6417
|
posted
i was going to go with heads and intake befor pro-charger, is wiondsor R heads any good from world casting?
--------------------
Humm... The power of cheese!
Posts: 25 | From: Pollock Pines | Registered: Jan 2006
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
