T O P I C R E V I E W
|
1991CHP
Member # 5097
|
posted
Need some imput please. I have my 306 almost ready. Its going in my 1991 CHP 5 speed, with either a 3.73 or 4.10 rearend, headers, h pipe, flows, just need some help on heads and intake. My pistons are just stock, not notched or anything, so..... I have an RPM intake, should I just get the matching heads, or most people say go with the TRICK FLOW set up ie; heads and intake, 1.7 rollers and what not.
Any ideas or feedback on heads???
|
Krz88lx
Member # 4261
|
posted
go with afr 165, good heads.
|
89 FAKE SNAKE
Member # 4531
|
posted
im goin wit tha tfs kit...i like it..
|
stoauto
Member # 2803
|
posted
AFR, AFR, AFR.
|
FasterDamnit
Member # 442
|
posted
Here you go- extensive testing of most heads for the SBF (including two versions of the AFR 165's).
http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/heads.php
|
Mr JoCo
Member # 1549
|
posted
Everyone jocks AFR too much. I'd pair the trick flow TW's with that rpm intake and save a buck or two.
|
2stangs69-91
Member # 1951
|
posted
they jock them because they are a good head. So are the TW. There are alot of great heads out there. The new edelbrock RPM's tested pretty well also. You have to try really hard to find a bad aluminum head. I have probbaly one of the poorest buy rep LOL
|
stoauto
Member # 2803
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Mr JoCo: Everyone jocks AFR too much. I'd pair the trick flow TW's with that rpm intake and save a buck or two.
hmmm i wonder why
|
1991CHP
Member # 5097
|
posted
So, no one is really a fan of the EDELBROCKS????
|
WANARNM
Member # 587
|
posted
Edelbrocks are good heads.. but not too many ppl run them anymore. u can find them pretty cheap now dayz. id go AFR all the way. good luck
|
98slowhoe 'FIFTYLX'
Member # 895
|
posted
I run TW's and an RPM intake with a decent custom grind and it moves pretty good!
|
season'd 88
Member # 169
|
posted
[ November 06, 2006, 01:49 AM: Message edited by: season'd 88 ]
|
93PONY
Member # 60
|
posted
I've taken Edelbrock 6037's into the 11's with a box stock RPM intake & large cam (notched pistons). The heads were milled .020 inch & had some port-work on the exhaust side. They are not bad heads, but box-stock AFR165's would have made more average power across the board.
|
talaposa
Member # 2460
|
posted
AFR's. For my own personal bias I rate as follows: AFR followed by Twisted wedge R and Edelbrock. Too much casting flash and lack of finish work on the edelbrock and the twisted wedge has a great idea with valve location but is expensive to use because of the need to notch or purchase pistons.
|
FasterDamnit
Member # 442
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by talaposa: AFR's. For my own personal bias I rate as follows: AFR followed by Twisted wedge R and Edelbrock. Too much casting flash and lack of finish work on the edelbrock and the twisted wedge has a great idea with valve location but is expensive to use because of the need to notch or purchase pistons.
If you select the right cam, no need to notch pistons. I ran 228* and .571" lift on my intake side w/ plenty of clearence and TW heads. It's all about the overlap phase.
|
9lbpony
Member # 3510
|
posted
run the Dominion 4-valve heads that are still pushrod.
|
92stangLX
Member # 3252
|
posted
I'm running the Twisted Wedge heads w/ the stage 1 cam and I am happy.
They are a good bang for the buck.
|