T O P I C R E V I E W
|
Blownhatch
Member # 167
|
posted
Is a 61 Ford Falcon Frame the same as the mustang frame. I heard that but stangs werent made til 64.
|
FasterDamnit
Member # 442
|
posted
No frames. They are unibody cars. Yes, the Mustang was built off of the Falcon platform, so it is a rebodied Falcon.
edit: unsure of changes made between '61 and '64 to the Falcon. [ December 22, 2004, 10:53 AM: Message edited by: FasterDamnit ]
|
T-TopTerror
Member # 480
|
posted
WAIT!!!
I justed talked to my Falcon Guru. He says 61 is different from 62-63, and that those models are different from 64. He also says the mustang is built off the falcon's design. The mustang is actually wider with shock towers that are appox. 1" wider too. The suspension is obviously a different angle so i am assuming that the suspension is different as well. He's claims proff lies in the fact that you can only put a 351 in a mustang. They won't fit in a Falcon.
|
Blownhatch
Member # 167
|
posted
I just want to stuff 5.0 drivetrain in it. with a few mods here and there.
|
wilit
Member # 3367
|
posted
The Mustang is more closely related to the Fairlane than the Falcon (size wise).
|
talaposa
Member # 2460
|
posted
I've done 6 V-8 conversions and a 351 can fit into an early falcon. Bolts right up just like the 302 but you have to modify the shock towers to get headers in. Actually I prefer the 302.
|
BlueOvalRacing
Member # 1531
|
posted
I shoehorned a 351 Cleveland into my 64 Falcon But I was young and dumb at the time.
|
T-TopTerror
Member # 480
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by talaposa: I've done 6 V-8 conversions and a 351 can fit into an early falcon. Bolts right up just like the 302 but you have to modify the shock towers to get headers in. Actually I prefer the 302.
See...modifications needed.
|