|
Author
|
Topic: Bassani cated X v.s. MAC Pro Chamber
|
4.6GT
¯
Member # 2643
|
posted
 
 
i currently have the MAC pro Chamber with 2 chamber flowmasters and was think about getting a bassani cated x pipe.the question is if go the cated x pipe will i loose power or gain? and is it worth the switch performance wise? thanx guys
--------------------
CAR 2002 mustang GT 5spd
254rwhp/305 ft lb torque N/A
Best E.T
1.93 60ft 13.1 @105
Posts: 320 | From: Nor Cal | Registered: Mar 2003
| :
|
|
BlackNGold
CaliforniaFords.com
Moderator
Member # 655
|
posted
I never liked the Mac Pro-chamber, but I think it's what ever you think personally sounds better...
The Bassani X is stainless and will last longer than the Mac Pro-chamber...
--------------------
-SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT-
Posts: 5132 | From: Bay Area, CA | Registered: Dec 2001
| :
|
|
4.6GT
¯
Member # 2643
|
posted
i like the way they both sound but in switching to the bassani will i lose or gain hp?
--------------------
CAR 2002 mustang GT 5spd
254rwhp/305 ft lb torque N/A
Best E.T
1.93 60ft 13.1 @105
Posts: 320 | From: Nor Cal | Registered: Mar 2003
| :
|
|
mtbaughs
Road Racer
Member # 4052
|
posted
Well since you are switching from a non catted pipe to a catted pipe one would normally think you would lose a little power. I on the other hand think it will be very minimal based on the fact that the power chamber design is almost like running an extra muffler in your exhaust system. Maybe another member who has made this switch can add some input here. The fact still remains that you will be stepping into an X-pipe which is built far better than what Mac builds as pretty much every item Mac builds is low doller and low quality.
--------------------
R.I.P. Charlie Bruno Dec 2001
Posts: 2019 | From: Boise, Idaho | Registered: Jan 2004
| :
|
|
vpr_klr
¯
Member # 3353
|
posted
in an old 5.0 magazine test, the Prochamber made more power than a bassani x, bbk x, or a dr. gas x. The only one that was better was the Hedman. The bassani did tie the prochamber for torque though. Ask Bassani about their new metallic cats that on a 600 wheel hp car only sucked up like 6-7 hp over their old design, and 9-10 hp over an offroad, the new pipes come with off road tubes also for the track ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
--------------------
Project crustang has begun
14 mustangs and counting...
Posts: 893 | From: Livermore | Registered: Oct 2003
| :
|
|
166 Merlo
FELONY
MOTORSPORTS
Member # 1549
|
posted
x pipes suck, get an H ![[Whoo Whooooo!]](graemlins/woowoo.gif)
--------------------
'89 - Boss Coupe
'70 - Drop Cutthang
'68 - Cougnut
'87 - 0166, Its real
Posts: 3954 | From: Thebay | Registered: Jul 2002
| :
|
|
mustanggt5091
All I need is.....
Member # 444
|
posted
i would stick with the prochamber. Quick88lx on here has had all three H,X, and the pro chamber. Seat of the pants test gave the pro chamber the win, thats what he currently has on, sounds good too
--------------------
88 GT 357w (SOLD):(
06 Limited Edition R6 !!!!!
Posts: 2353 | From: Fairfield / Santa Rosa , Ca | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
4.6GT
¯
Member # 2643
|
posted
k guys thanx for the imputs ill stay with the pro chamber
--------------------
CAR 2002 mustang GT 5spd
254rwhp/305 ft lb torque N/A
Best E.T
1.93 60ft 13.1 @105
Posts: 320 | From: Nor Cal | Registered: Mar 2003
| :
|
|
TRIXSNK
¯
Member # 2844
|
posted
Thought i'd add my 2 cents.....had a prochamber and flows but sold the prochamber.
Wish i had it back...loved the sound and the diff in performance would probably quite minimal unless you have other major mods.(i.e forced induction of some sort)
Either way the sound more than made up for any loss in power.
My opinion.
--------------------
9 Sec EVO 9 is GONE!
New project in the works.......
Posts: 3740 | From: Bay Area | Registered: May 2003
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
