This is topic Accufab Plenum Vs. C&L Plenum in forum Tech Talk at Northern California Ford Owners  .


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=6;t=006357
Posted by LeThAl StAnG GT (Member # 2695) on :
 
http://www.mustangweekly.com/2003/October/Tech/accu-1.asp
http://www.cnlperformance.com/plenum.html

WHAT DO U GUYS THINK? DOES ANYBODY HERE HAVE EITHER OF THESE? ARE THEY WORTH THE MONEY? IS THERE A BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO? ONE BETTER THAN THE OTHER?

[ December 19, 2003, 07:35 PM: Message edited by: LeThAl StAnG GT ]
 
Posted by J's KING Cobra (Member # 2011) on :
 
I would go with the accufab one's...they were mentioned in the recent 5.0 magazine, i think they got a 8 RWHP gain on a semi-bolted-on 01 GT. And I think APEX is selling them cheap...check out the VENDOR SECTION.

good luck [patriot]
 
Posted by NORCAL281 (Member # 3754) on :
 
i got the c&l intake plenum on my stang and for the cost and install it was worth buying. i dont have dyno #'s but you can go on the website and check out some #'s they did on a few cars! i say you get the accufab one from APEX because the c&l intake is ugly looking, but its up to you. later...
 
Posted by QWICK46 (Member # 1843) on :
 
I also got the C&L Plenum, along with the 75mm T.B. they recommend. Can't really compare it to the Acufab plenum, but I'm very satisfied with my C&L, BBK combo. No dyno numbers to post, but it definately gave me a good SOTP improvement, especially from 3000 rpm up.
 




Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com