|
Author
|
Topic: Car got dynoed today
|
1SLOWLX
¯
Member # 558
|
posted
 
 
Well it is an okay amount of power for the 347. It made 353rwhp and 360rwtq. What do you guys think this power will make the car run? I am hoping for somewhere in the 11's mid to upper is fine with me. As for the suspension it has welded torque boxes, steeda aluminum upper and lower control arms, 50/50 rear shocks, 70/30 front struts. The rear end is waiting in my room it is an eaton posi unit 31 spline strange axels, clip elimators, and 3.73 gears. The car has 3.73 right now but I am going to upgrade it all to what I just listed. So what do you guys think?
--------------------
Built Tuff with your stuff ;)
Posts: 5231 | From: bay area | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
BlackNGold
CaliforniaFords.com
Moderator
Member # 655
|
posted
NICE NUMBERS!....
I think that low 12's are easily obtainable....It depends on how much your car weights, but I'm sure 11's are right around the corner...
--------------------
-SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT-
Posts: 5132 | From: Bay Area, CA | Registered: Dec 2001
| :
|
|
AaronC
¯
Member # 86
|
posted
Ouch! ![[Eek!]](eek.gif) I was expecting around 400 RWHP. Doesn't the motor have some TEA 185's and a custom TEA cam 240/244?
--------------------
1991 GT Convertible: Stock 157k mile shortblock, HiTech cam, AFR 165 heads, Edelbrock RPM intake, 1 3/4 headers
12.23 at 112.99
Best MPH 113.97
Posts: 776 | From: woodland | Registered: Dec 2000
| :
|
|
Blu50Stang
CAFords OG
Member # 489
|
posted
I'd say you are looking at mid/low 12s
--------------------
Ross
'88 GT - 5.0&SF 4/04 | MM&FF 8/09 | MM&FF 79-93 Mustang Performance Cover 12/12
'17 GT350R
Posts: 1916 | From: Not CA | Registered: Oct 2001
| :
|
|
1SLOWLX
¯
Member # 558
|
posted
Yeah it does I wanted some in the 400 also but hey the numbers are there and I think 11's are very there. It should it low 12's very easy. I have a holley intake on the damn thing do you think that is what holding me back. It is a 10 to one 347. It runs really really well though
--------------------
Built Tuff with your stuff ;)
Posts: 5231 | From: bay area | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
1SLOWLX
¯
Member # 558
|
posted
Another thing is this thing is very street friendly I can drive it anywhere it isn't a trailor queen
--------------------
Built Tuff with your stuff ;)
Posts: 5231 | From: bay area | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
Jeff S
¯
Member # 371
|
posted
Can you post the dyno graph? I'd call TEA and see what they have to say about those numbers...something definitely isn't right.
What is the rest of the combo again?
--------------------
'90 Mustang LX: 8.53 @ 157.92 w/ 1.33 60' on DR's
'10 ZR1: FOR SALE
'14 E63 S: RENNtech ECU
'04 Gallardo: UGR TTG
Posts: 2121 | From: San Jose, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
Stimson
_
Member # 51
|
posted
Yeah, I too was expecting more than 350 rwhp. Can you post the dyno graph? It should run around 115 mph at the track.
Posts: 2373 | Registered: Jun 2000
| :
|
|
1SLOWLX
¯
Member # 558
|
posted
347 10 to one tea 185 cc holley intake 75mm throttle body, 80mm mass air 30 lb injectors, Tea custom cam 240 244 545 lift, bbk 1 3\4 inch headers with 2 1\2 inch exhaust, and other little things
--------------------
Built Tuff with your stuff ;)
Posts: 5231 | From: bay area | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
Hater
¯
Member # 3085
|
posted
I think 11s with those numbers are going to be hard to get,,but I'd say mid 12s are a good number though. ![[Smile]](smile.gif)
Posts: 168 | Registered: Jul 2003
| :
|
|
jmcclesk
Moderator
Member # 1355
|
posted
I made 337 at the wheels with tea 185's on a 302 stock short block. If you call me sometime this week I can tell you that to check. I had to spend 200.00 at a local machine shop the get everything to work right. ![[burnout]](graemlins/burnout.gif)
--------------------
Ford trained ASE master tech.
Posts: 4024 | From: marrysville | Registered: May 2002
| :
|
|
1SLOWLX
¯
Member # 558
|
posted
What were wrong with your heads? I really don't want to have this thing apart again it isn't really worth it to me.
Albert
--------------------
Built Tuff with your stuff ;)
Posts: 5231 | From: bay area | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
FasterDamnit
Bad Attitude
Member # 442
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Hater:
I think 11s with those numbers are going to be hard to get,,but I'd say mid 12s are a good number though.
Uhhh- I don't think so. If he gets a good launch on slicks ( he has the rest of the suspension pretty well setup) AND the car is not a heavyweight, 11's are a lock.
--------------------
'92 LX T5
Looked stock, went 11's 11.90 at 115mph.
'65 Mustang 347
www.fordmuscle.com
Livin' in the Carolina Pines
Posts: 2971 | From: NorCal | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
166 Merlo
FELONY
MOTORSPORTS
Member # 1549
|
posted
Do you have longtubes? how about a 3" free flowing exhaust? think that would help? or how about some cutouts? ![[Cool]](cool.gif)
--------------------
'89 - Boss Coupe
'70 - Drop Cutthang
'68 - Cougnut
'87 - 0166, Its real
Posts: 3954 | From: Thebay | Registered: Jul 2002
| :
|
|
Stimson
_
Member # 51
|
posted
If you're happy with your car, that's all that counts really. Finding a 5.O driver happy with his combo is more rare than a 400rwhp 347 ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
Posts: 2373 | Registered: Jun 2000
| :
|
|
Team SOLO
Chevy Powered Stang
Member # 722
|
posted
yoyoyo...
what does your car weigh? stick or automatic? what tires are you gonna run on the car?
300 rwhp got me consistent 12.0's @ 111/112 but my car was lighter than a feather.
--------------------
'88 Mustang Coupe: 8.02 @ 170
Posts: 3887 | From: Santa Clara | Registered: Jan 2002
| :
|
|
JoeT
¯
Member # 298
|
posted
let me drive it and I will break an axle or run 11.5s ![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif) , one or the other ![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
[ October 12, 2003, 12:05 PM: Message edited by: shade- ]
--------------------
1984 Ford Tempo AOD--- RIP
Posts: 6785 | From: San Jose | Registered: Jun 2001
| :
|
|
4RS FED
¯
Member # 2067
|
posted
if you get me that graph albert i can post if for you.
--------------------
i have a twin turbo mustang and you don't!
Posts: 3686 | From: 650 | Registered: Nov 2002
| :
|
|
1SLOWLX
¯
Member # 558
|
posted
Rob I will get you the graph. Chris taped the dyno run maybe you can post it from chris. I think mid to upper 11's are more than reachable with this power level. It made over 300 pounds of torque all the way up.
I am going to be running some 26 by 10.5 et streets and the car is a 5spd.
--------------------
Built Tuff with your stuff ;)
Posts: 5231 | From: bay area | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
Stimson
_
Member # 51
|
posted
What RPM did you make peak HP at?
Posts: 2373 | Registered: Jun 2000
| :
|
|
Camara90
1%
Member # 134
|
posted
Like everyone else said what does the car weight? That will give you the best idea. If i were you I would start looking into a few things as well I made 357 rwhp and i belive 363 torque with a afr 165 untouched and an x c cam with the holley intake, and 30 lb injectors with 1 5/8 headers. Not trying to say anything bad about your setup but if it were me I would wantto know what the problem is. But then again im one of those guys sawson was talking about who is never happy
--------------------
92GT,stock short block,9:1 TFS 170's,perf rpm,custom cam,1 5/8 shorties,C4 trans.
std. 356hp, 350tq
11.85@111.9mph on motor.
Posts: 2351 | From: 707 | Registered: Jan 2001
| :
|
|
AaronC
¯
Member # 86
|
posted
Mike- 353 RWHP at 5600 and 371 TQ at 4400. Just looked at your old sheets today
--------------------
1991 GT Convertible: Stock 157k mile shortblock, HiTech cam, AFR 165 heads, Edelbrock RPM intake, 1 3/4 headers
12.23 at 112.99
Best MPH 113.97
Posts: 776 | From: woodland | Registered: Dec 2000
| :
|
|
z ya
¯
Member # 1327
|
posted
Nice numbers bro...With a good hook should go high 11's easy..
--------------------
03 Yukon 6" RCD/welds/MTR's
69 Camaro
72 Commando/500 caddy/39.5 Boggers
96 Dodge Cummins/2" Procomp/35's
Posts: 414 | From: stockton,ca | Registered: May 2002
| :
|
|
1SLOWLX
¯
Member # 558
|
posted
I don't know what my car weighs but it is a typical Lx basically. No Ac and a couple of aluminum things here and there.
The torque max was at 4000 and the peak hp was at 5800. The two meet with each other at around 5250. I mean I really am wondering where the other 20-30rwhp is? Do you guys think it is in the intake?? How about the exhaust it has that shitty bbk collector that is like 2 and 1/4 inch. The exhaust is only 2 and 1/2 inches. But I am going to drive it for a while let it have some track time and look at the numbers. From thoses numbers I will make a choice to rip it apart and change things or keep it the same
Albert
--------------------
Built Tuff with your stuff ;)
Posts: 5231 | From: bay area | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
JoeT
¯
Member # 298
|
posted
are you running a race-crank underdrive pulley?
--------------------
1984 Ford Tempo AOD--- RIP
Posts: 6785 | From: San Jose | Registered: Jun 2001
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
