Author
|
Topic: Which MAF????
|
RedCorbaVert
New Member
Member # 2741
|
posted
What is the better MAF and why?
I alwasy thought Pro-M was the way to go - and I am not sure why.
But I was talking to Dugan Motorsports last week and he said C&L is better than ProM - the guy said it just works better. Their Power Pipe a CL MAF and a big Filter is the way to go.
What are your guys thoughts?
Any Dynos with both - differences?
Thanks
__________________
Posts: 8 | From: Bay Area Cali | Registered: Apr 2003
| :
|
|
91 5.0
¯
Member # 1527
|
posted
For apex to tune the car, I think you have to have a Pro-M. Thats just what I hear, ive never had a tune.
-------------------- 02 GT - Zinc Yellow 91 5.0 LX - Red
Posts: 1316 | From: Fairfield | Registered: Jul 2002
| :
|
|
MoostangGT
¯
Member # 2894
|
posted
Pro-M.. My idle problems stopped when I went from a C&L to a Pro-M.. also places like fordchip will not tune a C&L via mail because the flow rates are so inconsistant on them.
I am sold on Pro-M..
-------------------- Sabrina aka The chick in the cow print pants.
Posts: 106 | From: Redding, CA | Registered: Jun 2003
| :
|
|
BlackNGold
CaliforniaFords.com Moderator
Member # 655
|
posted
I have a Pro-M 75mm Bullit....It took me atleast 3 times of me sending it back to get re-calibrated to get it right....In the end they just sent me an Optimizer box to calibrate it myself...
I have friends (5.0 and 4.6) with C&L with the Power Pipe set up and they have had no problems with the MAF at all....
-------------------- -SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT-
Posts: 5132 | From: Bay Area, CA | Registered: Dec 2001
| :
|
|
Gear Head
JARED
Member # 779
|
posted
I heard Pro-M is better for some of the same reasons listed above and you can just buy a sample tube to re-calibrate it incase you change injectors instead of having to send it back to the company for them to do it.
-------------------- Support our troops!
Posts: 5685 | From: EASTBAY | Registered: Jan 2002
| :
|
|
Jdub07
( O Y O )
Member # 2728
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by RedCorbaVert: What is the better MAF and why?
I alwasy thought Pro-M was the way to go - and I am not sure why.
But I was talking to Dugan Motorsports last week and he said C&L is better than ProM - the guy said it just works better. Their Power Pipe a CL MAF and a big Filter is the way to go.
What are your guys thoughts?
Any Dynos with both - differences?
Thanks
__________________
I would buy C&L again. Noticable HP! Easy Install and if anyone tells you people buy C&L because its cheaper than Pro-M they may be smokin crack. as for the tuning I have no idea you may want to go with the Pro-M if certain shops will tune you car with only that. Get a mustang mag make some and compair the two, then get what will suit your needs the best.
Posts: 7282 | Registered: Apr 2003
| :
|
|
91 5.0
¯
Member # 1527
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 91sleeper: I heard Pro-M is better for some of the same reasons listed above and you can just buy a sample tube to re-calibrate it incase you change injectors instead of having to send it back to the company for them to do it.
No, C&L has the changable sampling tubes, not Pro-M.
-------------------- 02 GT - Zinc Yellow 91 5.0 LX - Red
Posts: 1316 | From: Fairfield | Registered: Jul 2002
| :
|
|